VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Stock Comparison

Oriental Land Co., Ltd. vs Verisk Analytics, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Oriental Land Co., Ltd.

4661 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
95/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Oriental Land Co., Ltd.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 4661 analysis

Verisk Analytics, Inc.

VRSK · NASDAQ Global Select Market

Market cap (USD)$31.3B
SectorIndustrials
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
87/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View VRSK analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Oriental Land Co., Ltd. leads (95 / 100 vs 87 / 100 for Verisk Analytics, Inc.).
  • Segment focus: Oriental Land Co., Ltd. has 3 segments (81.3% in Theme Park Segment); Verisk Analytics, Inc. has 2 segments (70.2% in Underwriting Solutions).
  • Primary market structure: Duopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: Oriental Land Co., Ltd. has 5 moat types across 4 domains; Verisk Analytics, Inc. has 6 across 3.

Primary market context

Oriental Land Co., Ltd.

Theme Park Segment

Market

Large-scale destination theme parks in Japan (Tokyo Disney Resort parks: Tokyo Disneyland and Tokyo DisneySea)

Geography

Japan (with inbound tourism)

Customer

Consumers (domestic residents and inbound tourists), plus group/agency channels

Role

Owner/operator of theme parks under licensed IP

Revenue share

81.3%

Verisk Analytics, Inc.

Underwriting Solutions

Market

Property and casualty insurance underwriting content and analytics (forms and rules and loss costs, underwriting data and catastrophe and weather risk)

Geography

Primarily U.S. (with growing international offerings)

Customer

P&C insurers (personal and commercial lines)

Role

Insurance data and analytics and standards and content provider

Revenue share

70.2%

Side-by-side metrics

Oriental Land Co., Ltd.
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
4661 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
VRSK - NASDAQ Global Select Market
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$31.3B
Sector
Consumer
Industrials
HQ country
JP
US
Primary segment
Theme Park Segment
Underwriting Solutions
Market structure
Duopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
62%-65% (implied)
n/a
HHI estimate
5,349
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Strong
Moat score
95 / 100
87 / 100
Moat domains
Legal, Demand, Supply, Network
Network, Legal, Demand
Last update
2025-12-30
2025-12-30

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Ecosystem Complements

Oriental Land Co., Ltd. strengths

Content Rights CurrencyBrand TrustCapex Knowhow ScaleDistribution Control

Verisk Analytics, Inc. strengths

De Facto StandardCompliance AdvantageData Workflow LockinFormat Lock InData Network Effects

Segment mix

Oriental Land Co., Ltd. segments

Full profile >

Theme Park Segment

Duopoly

81.3%

Hotel Business Segment

Oligopoly

16.2%

Other Business Segment

Competitive

2.5%

Verisk Analytics, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Underwriting Solutions

Oligopoly

70.2%

Claims Solutions

Oligopoly

29.8%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.