VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Stock Comparison

Nabtesco Corporation vs Kongsberg Gruppen ASA

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Nabtesco Corporation

6268 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorIndustrials
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
91/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Nabtesco Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 6268 analysis

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA

KOG · Euronext Oslo Bors

Market cap (USD)$22.8B
SectorIndustrials
CountryNO
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
81/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Kongsberg Gruppen ASA's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View KOG analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Nabtesco Corporation leads (91 / 100 vs 81 / 100 for Kongsberg Gruppen ASA).
  • Segment focus: Nabtesco Corporation has 4 segments (34.2% in Component Solutions Business); Kongsberg Gruppen ASA has 4 segments (49.5% in Kongsberg Maritime).
  • Primary market structure: Quasi-Monopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Nabtesco Corporation has 5 moat types across 3 domains; Kongsberg Gruppen ASA has 9 across 4.

Primary market context

Nabtesco Corporation

Component Solutions Business

Market

Precision reduction gears (RV reducers) for industrial robot joints

Geography

Global

Customer

Industrial robot manufacturers (OEMs)

Role

Precision motion-control component supplier

Revenue share

34.2%

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA

Kongsberg Maritime

Market

Maritime technology & integrated ship systems (propulsion, automation, bridge, energy efficiency, service)

Geography

Global

Customer

Shipyards, shipowners, offshore operators, naval customers

Role

OEM and systems integrator; aftermarket service provider

Revenue share

49.5%

Side-by-side metrics

Nabtesco Corporation
Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
Ticker / Exchange
6268 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
KOG - Euronext Oslo Bors
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$22.8B
Sector
Industrials
Industrials
HQ country
JP
NO
Primary segment
Component Solutions Business
Kongsberg Maritime
Market structure
Quasi-Monopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
55%-65% (reported)
30%-35% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
91 / 100
81 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand, Legal
Demand, Supply, Legal, Network
Last update
2025-12-30
2025-12-28

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Design In QualificationCompliance AdvantageService Field Network

Nabtesco Corporation strengths

Learning Curve YieldBrand Trust

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA strengths

Installed Base ConsumablesGovernment Contracting RelationshipsLong Term ContractsCapex Knowhow ScaleData Workflow LockinEcosystem Complements

Segment mix

Nabtesco Corporation segments

Full profile >

Component Solutions Business

Quasi-Monopoly

34.2%

Transport Solutions Business

Oligopoly

27.4%

Accessibility Solutions Business

Quasi-Monopoly

33%

Other Businesses

Quasi-Monopoly

5.4%

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA segments

Full profile >

Kongsberg Maritime

Oligopoly

49.5%

Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace

Oligopoly

38.2%

Kongsberg Discovery

Competitive

8.8%

Kongsberg Digital

Competitive

3.5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.