VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Thursday, January 8, 2026

Stock Comparison

Apple Inc. vs Dino Polska S.A.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Apple Inc.

AAPL · NASDAQ

Market cap (USD)$3.9T
Gross margin (TTM)46.9%
Operating margin (TTM)32%
Net margin (TTM)26.9%
SectorTechnology
IndustryConsumer Electronics
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-20
Moat score
87/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Apple Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View AAPL analysis

Dino Polska S.A.

DNP · Warsaw Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$3.7B
Gross margin (TTM)26.1%
Operating margin (TTM)272.7%
Net margin (TTM)261.5%
SectorConsumer
IndustryAsset Management - Income
CountryPL
Data as of2026-01-05
Moat score
66/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Dino Polska S.A.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View DNP analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Apple Inc. leads (87 / 100 vs 66 / 100 for Dino Polska S.A.).
  • Segment focus: Apple Inc. has 5 segments (50.4% in iPhone); Dino Polska S.A. has 1 segment (100% in Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Weak.
  • Moat breadth: Apple Inc. has 7 moat types across 3 domains; Dino Polska S.A. has 5 across 2.

Primary market context

Apple Inc.

iPhone

Market

Smartphones (with focus on premium smartphones and iOS ecosystem devices)

Geography

Global

Customer

Consumers and enterprises (end-users), plus carrier/retail channels

Role

OEM / platform owner

Revenue share

50.4%

Dino Polska S.A.

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Market

Retail grocery (mid-sized proximity supermarkets)

Geography

Poland

Customer

Households / consumers

Role

Brick-and-mortar grocery retailer

Revenue share

100%

Side-by-side metrics

Apple Inc.
Dino Polska S.A.
Ticker / Exchange
AAPL - NASDAQ
DNP - Warsaw Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$3.9T
$3.7B
Gross margin (TTM)
46.9%
26.1%
Operating margin (TTM)
32%
272.7%
Net margin (TTM)
26.9%
261.5%
Sector
Technology
Consumer
Industry
Consumer Electronics
Asset Management - Income
HQ country
US
PL
Primary segment
iPhone
Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
14%-17% (reported)
7%-9% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Weak
Moat score
87 / 100
66 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Network, Supply
Supply, Demand
Last update
2025-12-20
2026-01-05

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Scale Economies Unit Cost

Apple Inc. strengths

Brand TrustEcosystem ComplementsSwitching Costs GeneralDefault OS GatewayTwo Sided NetworkInstalled Base Consumables

Dino Polska S.A. strengths

Physical Network DensityHabit DefaultSupply Chain ControlOperational Excellence

Segment mix

Apple Inc. segments

Full profile >

iPhone

Oligopoly

50.4%

Mac

Oligopoly

8.1%

iPad

Oligopoly

6.7%

Wearables, Home and Accessories

Competitive

8.6%

Services

Quasi-Monopoly

26.2%

Dino Polska S.A. segments

Full profile >

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Oligopoly

100%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.