VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★
NO ADVICE
Thursday, January 1, 2026
Stock Comparison
Aon plc vs PACCAR Inc
Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.
Aon plc
AON · New York Stock Exchange
Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.
PACCAR Inc
PCAR · NASDAQ
Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.
Comparison highlights
- Moat score gap: PACCAR Inc leads (75 / 100 vs 70 / 100 for Aon plc).
- Segment focus: Aon plc has 2 segments (67% in Risk Capital); PACCAR Inc has 3 segments (73.8% in Truck).
- Moat breadth: Aon plc has 6 moat types across 3 domains; PACCAR Inc has 8 across 3.
Primary market context
Aon plc
Risk Capital
Large-account commercial insurance & reinsurance brokerage and risk advisory
Global
Enterprises, insurers, reinsurers
Intermediary/advisor
67%
PACCAR Inc
Truck
Commercial truck OEM (heavy- and medium-duty)
Global (U.S./Canada and Europe primary)
Fleets, owner-operators, dealers
OEM / manufacturer
73.8%
Side-by-side metrics
Moat coverage
Shared moat types
Aon plc strengths
PACCAR Inc strengths
Segment mix
Aon plc segments
Full profile >Risk Capital
Oligopoly
Human Capital
Oligopoly
PACCAR Inc segments
Full profile >Truck
Oligopoly
Parts
Competitive
Financial Services
Competitive
Want the full wide moat stocks list?
Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.
View the moat stocks listCuration & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.