VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

* WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON *

NO ADVICE

Sunday, December 28, 2025

Stock Comparison

The Boeing Company vs Manhattan Associates, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

The Boeing Company

BA · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorIndustrials
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-23
Moat score
61/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

View full moat analysis >

Manhattan Associates, Inc.

MANH · The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Market cap (USD)$10.6B
SectorTechnology
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
56/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

View full moat analysis >

Side-by-side metrics

The Boeing Company
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
BA - New York Stock Exchange
MANH - The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$10.6B
Sector
Industrials
Technology
HQ country
US
US
Primary segment
Defense, Space & Security (BDS)
Professional services (implementation, consulting, training)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Competitive
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Weak
Weak
Moat score
61 / 100
56 / 100
Moat domains
Legal, Supply, Demand
Demand
Last update
2025-12-23
2025-12-28

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Long Term ContractsInstalled Base ConsumablesData Workflow Lockin

The Boeing Company strengths

Regulated Standards PipeCapex Knowhow ScaleDesign In QualificationGovernment Contracting RelationshipsCompliance AdvantageService Field Network

Manhattan Associates, Inc. strengths

Suite BundlingReputation ReviewsProcurement InertiaSwitching Costs General

Segment mix

The Boeing Company segments

Full profile >

Commercial Airplanes (BCA)

Duopoly

34.3%

Defense, Space & Security (BDS)

Oligopoly

35.8%

Global Services (BGS)

Competitive

29.9%

Manhattan Associates, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Cloud subscriptions (Manhattan Active SaaS)

Oligopoly

32.4%

Professional services (implementation, consulting, training)

Competitive

50.4%

Maintenance and support (legacy perpetual licenses)

Monopoly

13.3%

Perpetual licenses and hardware

Competitive

4%

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.