VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

CAR Group Limited vs Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

CAR Group Limited

CAR · ASX

Market cap (USD)$7.8B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorCommunication Services
Industry
CountryAU
Data as of
Moat score
69/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into CAR Group Limited's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CAR analysis

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA

CFR · SIX Swiss Exchange

Market cap (USD)$101.1B
Gross margin (TTM)66.8%
Operating margin (TTM)21.3%
Net margin (TTM)14.8%
SectorConsumer
IndustryLuxury Goods
CountryCH
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
84/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CFR analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA leads (84 / 100 vs 69 / 100 for CAR Group Limited).
  • Segment focus: CAR Group Limited has 5 segments (41% in Australia); Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has 3 segments (71.6% in Jewellery Maisons).
  • Moat breadth: CAR Group Limited has 6 moat types across 3 domains; Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has 4 across 2.

Primary market context

CAR Group Limited

Australia

Market

Online vehicle marketplace, dealer advertising & automotive data/services

Geography

Australia

Customer

Dealers, OEM advertisers, private sellers & buyers

Role

Two-sided marketplace + advertising + data/SaaS tools

Revenue share

41%

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA

Jewellery Maisons

Market

Luxury jewellery (branded fine jewellery & high jewellery)

Geography

Global

Customer

Affluent and high-net-worth consumers

Role

Brand owner, manufacturer and direct-to-client retailer

Revenue share

71.6%

Side-by-side metrics

CAR Group Limited
Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA
Ticker / Exchange
CAR - ASX
CFR - SIX Swiss Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$7.8B
$101.1B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
66.8%
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
21.3%
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
14.8%
Sector
Communication Services
Consumer
Industry
n/a
Luxury Goods
HQ country
AU
CH
Primary segment
Australia
Jewellery Maisons
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
30%-55% (implied)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Strong
Moat score
69 / 100
84 / 100
Moat domains
Network, Demand, Supply
Demand, Supply
Last update
2026-01-02
2025-12-30

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand Trust

CAR Group Limited strengths

Two Sided NetworkEcosystem ComplementsSwitching Costs GeneralOperational Excellenceminority-investment-optionality

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA strengths

Distribution ControlCapex Knowhow ScaleReputation Reviews

Segment mix

CAR Group Limited segments

Full profile >

Australia

Oligopoly

41%

North America

Oligopoly

26%

Latin America

Oligopoly

17.3%

Asia

Oligopoly

11.5%

Investments

Competitive

4.2%

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA segments

Full profile >

Jewellery Maisons

Oligopoly

71.6%

Specialist Watchmakers

Oligopoly

15.3%

Other (Fashion & Accessories, Watchfinder, ancillary)

Competitive

13%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.