VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

CAR Group Limited vs Masco Corporation

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

CAR Group Limited

CAR · ASX

Market cap (USD)$7.8B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorCommunication Services
Industry
CountryAU
Data as of
Moat score
69/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into CAR Group Limited's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CAR analysis

Masco Corporation

MAS · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$13.4B
Gross margin (TTM)35.7%
Operating margin (TTM)17%
Net margin (TTM)10.9%
SectorIndustrials
IndustryConstruction
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-26
Moat score
72/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Masco Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View MAS analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Masco Corporation leads (72 / 100 vs 69 / 100 for CAR Group Limited).
  • Segment focus: CAR Group Limited has 5 segments (41% in Australia); Masco Corporation has 2 segments (62% in Plumbing Products).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: CAR Group Limited has 6 moat types across 3 domains; Masco Corporation has 3 across 3.

Primary market context

CAR Group Limited

Australia

Market

Online vehicle marketplace, dealer advertising & automotive data/services

Geography

Australia

Customer

Dealers, OEM advertisers, private sellers & buyers

Role

Two-sided marketplace + advertising + data/SaaS tools

Revenue share

41%

Masco Corporation

Plumbing Products

Market

Residential plumbing fixtures and fittings (faucets, showers, valves, bath hardware, sinks) and plumbing components

Geography

North America and Europe

Customer

Home center retailers, wholesalers/distributors and online retailers; end users include plumbers, contractors, remodelers, homebuilders and consumers

Role

Branded manufacturer

Revenue share

62%

Side-by-side metrics

CAR Group Limited
Masco Corporation
Ticker / Exchange
CAR - ASX
MAS - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$7.8B
$13.4B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
35.7%
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
17%
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
10.9%
Sector
Communication Services
Industrials
Industry
n/a
Construction
HQ country
AU
US
Primary segment
Australia
Plumbing Products
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
69 / 100
72 / 100
Moat domains
Network, Demand, Supply
Demand, Supply, Legal
Last update
2026-01-02
2025-12-26

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand Trust

CAR Group Limited strengths

Two Sided NetworkEcosystem ComplementsSwitching Costs GeneralOperational Excellenceminority-investment-optionality

Masco Corporation strengths

Scope EconomiesContractual Exclusivity

Segment mix

CAR Group Limited segments

Full profile >

Australia

Oligopoly

41%

North America

Oligopoly

26%

Latin America

Oligopoly

17.3%

Asia

Oligopoly

11.5%

Investments

Competitive

4.2%

Masco Corporation segments

Full profile >

Plumbing Products

Oligopoly

62%

Decorative Architectural Products

Oligopoly

38%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.