VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

CAR Group Limited vs Pro Medicus Limited

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

CAR Group Limited

CAR · ASX

Market cap (USD)$7.8B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorCommunication Services
Industry
CountryAU
Data as of
Moat score
69/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into CAR Group Limited's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CAR analysis

Pro Medicus Limited

PME · ASX

Market cap (USD)$15.5B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorHealthcare
Industry
CountryAU
Data as of
Moat score
80/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Pro Medicus Limited's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View PME analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Pro Medicus Limited leads (80 / 100 vs 69 / 100 for CAR Group Limited).
  • Segment focus: CAR Group Limited has 5 segments (41% in Australia); Pro Medicus Limited has 2 segments (92.5% in Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)).
  • Moat breadth: CAR Group Limited has 6 moat types across 3 domains; Pro Medicus Limited has 6 across 2.

Primary market context

CAR Group Limited

Australia

Market

Online vehicle marketplace, dealer advertising & automotive data/services

Geography

Australia

Customer

Dealers, OEM advertisers, private sellers & buyers

Role

Two-sided marketplace + advertising + data/SaaS tools

Revenue share

41%

Pro Medicus Limited

Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)

Market

Enterprise imaging / PACS and related modules for hospitals and integrated delivery networks (IDNs)

Geography

Primarily North America; also Europe and Australia

Customer

Hospitals, imaging centers, integrated delivery networks (IDNs)

Role

Healthcare IT software vendor / platform provider

Revenue share

92.5%

Side-by-side metrics

CAR Group Limited
Pro Medicus Limited
Ticker / Exchange
CAR - ASX
PME - ASX
Market cap (USD)
$7.8B
$15.5B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
n/a
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
n/a
Sector
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industry
n/a
n/a
HQ country
AU
AU
Primary segment
Australia
Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
55% (implied)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Strong
Moat score
69 / 100
80 / 100
Moat domains
Network, Demand, Supply
Demand, Supply
Last update
2026-01-02
2026-01-02

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Switching Costs GeneralOperational Excellence

CAR Group Limited strengths

Two Sided NetworkBrand TrustEcosystem Complementsminority-investment-optionality

Pro Medicus Limited strengths

Data Workflow LockinKeystone ComponentSuite BundlingLong Term Contracts

Segment mix

CAR Group Limited segments

Full profile >

Australia

Oligopoly

41%

North America

Oligopoly

26%

Latin America

Oligopoly

17.3%

Asia

Oligopoly

11.5%

Investments

Competitive

4.2%

Pro Medicus Limited segments

Full profile >

Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)

Oligopoly

92.5%

Visage RIS (Radiology Information System) and Promedicus.net

Oligopoly

7.5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.