VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Stock Comparison

Cboe Global Markets, Inc. vs Dino Polska S.A.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Cboe Global Markets, Inc.

CBOE · Cboe BZX

Market cap (USD)$26.4B
Gross margin (TTM)48.2%
Operating margin (TTM)29.6%
Net margin (TTM)21.3%
SectorFinancials
IndustryFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-31
Moat score
76/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Cboe Global Markets, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CBOE analysis

Dino Polska S.A.

DNP · Warsaw Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$3.7B
Gross margin (TTM)26.1%
Operating margin (TTM)272.7%
Net margin (TTM)261.5%
SectorConsumer
IndustryAsset Management - Income
CountryPL
Data as of2026-01-05
Moat score
66/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Dino Polska S.A.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View DNP analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Cboe Global Markets, Inc. leads (76 / 100 vs 66 / 100 for Dino Polska S.A.).
  • Segment focus: Cboe Global Markets, Inc. has 5 segments (60.8% in Options); Dino Polska S.A. has 1 segment (100% in Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Moderate vs Weak.
  • Moat breadth: Cboe Global Markets, Inc. has 8 moat types across 4 domains; Dino Polska S.A. has 5 across 2.

Primary market context

Cboe Global Markets, Inc.

Options

Market

U.S. listed options exchanges (multi-listed + proprietary index options)

Geography

United States

Customer

Broker-dealers, market makers, institutional investors, retail order-flow intermediaries

Role

Exchange operator (SRO) + derivatives listing venue + market data provider

Revenue share

60.8%

Dino Polska S.A.

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Market

Retail grocery (mid-sized proximity supermarkets)

Geography

Poland

Customer

Households / consumers

Role

Brick-and-mortar grocery retailer

Revenue share

100%

Side-by-side metrics

Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
Dino Polska S.A.
Ticker / Exchange
CBOE - Cboe BZX
DNP - Warsaw Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$26.4B
$3.7B
Gross margin (TTM)
48.2%
26.1%
Operating margin (TTM)
29.6%
272.7%
Net margin (TTM)
21.3%
261.5%
Sector
Financials
Consumer
Industry
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Asset Management - Income
HQ country
US
PL
Primary segment
Options
Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
29%-32% (reported)
7%-9% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Weak
Moat score
76 / 100
66 / 100
Moat domains
Legal, Network, Supply, Demand
Supply, Demand
Last update
2025-12-31
2026-01-05

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

No overlap yet.

Cboe Global Markets, Inc. strengths

Contractual ExclusivityTwo Sided NetworkCapex Knowhow ScaleRegulated Standards PipeSwitching Costs GeneralClearing SettlementIP Choke PointDe Facto Standard

Dino Polska S.A. strengths

Physical Network DensityHabit DefaultSupply Chain ControlOperational ExcellenceScale Economies Unit Cost

Segment mix

Cboe Global Markets, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Options

Oligopoly

60.8%

North American Equities

Competitive

18.5%

Europe and Asia Pacific

Oligopoly

10.6%

Futures

Quasi-Monopoly

6.3%

Global FX

Competitive

3.7%

Dino Polska S.A. segments

Full profile >

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Oligopoly

100%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.