VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Stock Comparison

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA

CFR · SIX Swiss Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryCH
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
84/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CFR analysis

Carlisle Companies Incorporated

CSL · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$13.8B
SectorIndustrials
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-27
Moat score
61/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Carlisle Companies Incorporated's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CSL analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA leads (84 / 100 vs 61 / 100 for Carlisle Companies Incorporated).
  • Segment focus: Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has 3 segments (71.6% in Jewellery Maisons); Carlisle Companies Incorporated has 2 segments (74% in Carlisle Construction Materials (CCM)).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has 4 moat types across 2 domains; Carlisle Companies Incorporated has 4 across 2.

Primary market context

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA

Jewellery Maisons

Market

Luxury jewellery (branded fine jewellery & high jewellery)

Geography

Global

Customer

Affluent and high-net-worth consumers

Role

Brand owner, manufacturer and direct-to-client retailer

Revenue share

71.6%

Carlisle Companies Incorporated

Carlisle Construction Materials (CCM)

Market

Commercial roofing systems (single-ply membranes, insulation, accessories) and architectural metal roofing/wall systems

Geography

Primarily United States; also Europe

Customer

Contractors, building owners, distributors

Role

Manufacturer and system supplier

Revenue share

74%

Side-by-side metrics

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Ticker / Exchange
CFR - SIX Swiss Exchange
CSL - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$13.8B
Sector
Consumer
Industrials
HQ country
CH
US
Primary segment
Jewellery Maisons
Carlisle Construction Materials (CCM)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
30%-55% (implied)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
84 / 100
61 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-30
2025-12-27

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Distribution Control

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA strengths

Brand TrustCapex Knowhow ScaleReputation Reviews

Carlisle Companies Incorporated strengths

Switching Costs GeneralSuite BundlingOperational Excellence

Segment mix

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA segments

Full profile >

Jewellery Maisons

Oligopoly

71.6%

Specialist Watchmakers

Oligopoly

15.3%

Other (Fashion & Accessories, Watchfinder, ancillary)

Competitive

13%

Carlisle Companies Incorporated segments

Full profile >

Carlisle Construction Materials (CCM)

Oligopoly

74%

Carlisle Weatherproofing Technologies (CWT)

Competitive

26%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.