VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

Datadog, Inc. vs Pro Medicus Limited

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Datadog, Inc.

DDOG · NASDAQ

Market cap (USD)$46.9B
Gross margin (TTM)79.9%
Operating margin (TTM)-1.4%
Net margin (TTM)3.3%
SectorTechnology
IndustrySoftware - Application
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Datadog, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View DDOG analysis

Pro Medicus Limited

PME · ASX

Market cap (USD)$15.5B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorHealthcare
Industry
CountryAU
Data as of
Moat score
80/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Pro Medicus Limited's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View PME analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Pro Medicus Limited leads (80 / 100 vs 63 / 100 for Datadog, Inc.).
  • Segment focus: Datadog, Inc. has 2 segments; Pro Medicus Limited has 2 segments (92.5% in Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Moderate vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: Datadog, Inc. has 7 moat types across 4 domains; Pro Medicus Limited has 6 across 2.

Primary market context

Datadog, Inc.

Observability Platform

Market

Cloud observability / monitoring & analytics (metrics, logs, traces, RUM)

Geography

Global

Customer

Enterprise and mid-market (DevOps, SRE, engineering)

Role

SaaS platform vendor

Pro Medicus Limited

Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)

Market

Enterprise imaging / PACS and related modules for hospitals and integrated delivery networks (IDNs)

Geography

Primarily North America; also Europe and Australia

Customer

Hospitals, imaging centers, integrated delivery networks (IDNs)

Role

Healthcare IT software vendor / platform provider

Revenue share

92.5%

Side-by-side metrics

Datadog, Inc.
Pro Medicus Limited
Ticker / Exchange
DDOG - NASDAQ
PME - ASX
Market cap (USD)
$46.9B
$15.5B
Gross margin (TTM)
79.9%
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
-1.4%
n/a
Net margin (TTM)
3.3%
n/a
Sector
Technology
Healthcare
Industry
Software - Application
n/a
HQ country
US
AU
Primary segment
Observability Platform
Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
55% (implied)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Strong
Moat score
63 / 100
80 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Network, Supply, Legal
Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-28
2026-01-02

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Suite BundlingData Workflow LockinOperational Excellence

Datadog, Inc. strengths

Ecosystem ComplementsData Network EffectsBrand TrustCompliance Advantage

Pro Medicus Limited strengths

Keystone ComponentSwitching Costs GeneralLong Term Contracts

Segment mix

Datadog, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Observability Platform

Oligopoly

n/a

Cloud Security Platform

Competitive

n/a

Pro Medicus Limited segments

Full profile >

Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)

Oligopoly

92.5%

Visage RIS (Radiology Information System) and Promedicus.net

Oligopoly

7.5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.