VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Wide Moat Stocks Home My Collections

Stock Comparison

Fair Isaac Corporation vs Kongsberg Gruppen ASA

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Fair Isaac Corporation

FICO · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$41.4B
SectorTechnology
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-31
Moat score
82/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Fair Isaac Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View FICO analysis

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA

KOG · Euronext Oslo Bors

Market cap (USD)$22.8B
SectorIndustrials
CountryNO
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
81/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Kongsberg Gruppen ASA's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View KOG analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Fair Isaac Corporation leads (82 / 100 vs 81 / 100 for Kongsberg Gruppen ASA).
  • Segment focus: Fair Isaac Corporation has 2 segments (58.7% in Scores); Kongsberg Gruppen ASA has 4 segments (49.5% in Kongsberg Maritime).
  • Primary market structure: Quasi-Monopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Fair Isaac Corporation has 5 moat types across 2 domains; Kongsberg Gruppen ASA has 9 across 4.

Primary market context

Fair Isaac Corporation

Scores

Market

Consumer credit scoring and related predictive scores used in lending decisions

Geography

Primarily United States; also international

Customer

Lenders (mortgage, credit card, auto, etc.), consumer reporting agencies, and consumers (B2C)

Role

Score model developer/licensor; distribution via consumer reporting agencies and direct-to-consumer channels

Revenue share

58.7%

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA

Kongsberg Maritime

Market

Maritime technology & integrated ship systems (propulsion, automation, bridge, energy efficiency, service)

Geography

Global

Customer

Shipyards, shipowners, offshore operators, naval customers

Role

OEM and systems integrator; aftermarket service provider

Revenue share

49.5%

Side-by-side metrics

Fair Isaac Corporation
Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
Ticker / Exchange
FICO - New York Stock Exchange
KOG - Euronext Oslo Bors
Market cap (USD)
$41.4B
$22.8B
Sector
Technology
Industrials
HQ country
US
NO
Primary segment
Scores
Kongsberg Maritime
Market structure
Quasi-Monopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
90% (reported)
30%-35% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
82 / 100
81 / 100
Moat domains
Network, Demand
Demand, Supply, Legal, Network
Last update
2025-12-31
2025-12-28

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Data Workflow Lockin

Fair Isaac Corporation strengths

De Facto StandardFormat Lock InBrand TrustSwitching Costs General

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA strengths

Installed Base ConsumablesService Field NetworkCompliance AdvantageGovernment Contracting RelationshipsDesign In QualificationLong Term ContractsCapex Knowhow ScaleEcosystem Complements

Segment mix

Fair Isaac Corporation segments

Full profile >

Scores

Quasi-Monopoly

58.7%

Software

Competitive

41.3%

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA segments

Full profile >

Kongsberg Maritime

Oligopoly

49.5%

Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace

Oligopoly

38.2%

Kongsberg Discovery

Competitive

8.8%

Kongsberg Digital

Competitive

3.5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.