VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

HENSOLDT AG vs Pro Medicus Limited

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

HENSOLDT AG

HAG · Xetra

Market cap (USD)$8.8B
Gross margin (TTM)21.5%
Operating margin (TTM)8.9%
Net margin (TTM)5.2%
SectorIndustrials
IndustryAerospace & Defense
CountryDE
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
77/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into HENSOLDT AG's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View HAG analysis

Pro Medicus Limited

PME · ASX

Market cap (USD)$15.5B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorHealthcare
Industry
CountryAU
Data as of
Moat score
80/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Pro Medicus Limited's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View PME analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Pro Medicus Limited leads (80 / 100 vs 77 / 100 for HENSOLDT AG).
  • Segment focus: HENSOLDT AG has 2 segments (84.6% in Sensors); Pro Medicus Limited has 2 segments (92.5% in Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Moderate vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: HENSOLDT AG has 3 moat types across 2 domains; Pro Medicus Limited has 6 across 2.

Primary market context

HENSOLDT AG

Sensors

Market

Defence and security sensor solutions (radar, electronic warfare, avionics, mission systems integration)

Geography

Global (Europe-centric)

Customer

Government defence ministries/armed forces and defence prime contractors

Role

Defence electronics supplier / system integrator

Revenue share

84.6%

Pro Medicus Limited

Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)

Market

Enterprise imaging / PACS and related modules for hospitals and integrated delivery networks (IDNs)

Geography

Primarily North America; also Europe and Australia

Customer

Hospitals, imaging centers, integrated delivery networks (IDNs)

Role

Healthcare IT software vendor / platform provider

Revenue share

92.5%

Side-by-side metrics

HENSOLDT AG
Pro Medicus Limited
Ticker / Exchange
HAG - Xetra
PME - ASX
Market cap (USD)
$8.8B
$15.5B
Gross margin (TTM)
21.5%
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
8.9%
n/a
Net margin (TTM)
5.2%
n/a
Sector
Industrials
Healthcare
Industry
Aerospace & Defense
n/a
HQ country
DE
AU
Primary segment
Sensors
Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
55% (implied)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Strong
Moat score
77 / 100
80 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-28
2026-01-02

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Long Term Contracts

HENSOLDT AG strengths

Design In QualificationCapex Knowhow Scale

Pro Medicus Limited strengths

Data Workflow LockinKeystone ComponentOperational ExcellenceSuite BundlingSwitching Costs General

Segment mix

HENSOLDT AG segments

Full profile >

Sensors

Oligopoly

84.6%

Optronics

Oligopoly

15.4%

Pro Medicus Limited segments

Full profile >

Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)

Oligopoly

92.5%

Visage RIS (Radiology Information System) and Promedicus.net

Oligopoly

7.5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.