VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 9, 2026

Wide Moat Stocks Expansion-Stage Stocks Home My Collections

Stock Comparison

Judges Scientific plc vs KKR & Co. Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Judges Scientific plc

JDG · London Stock Exchange - AIM

Market cap (USD)—

Gross margin (TTM)—

Operating margin (TTM)—

Net margin (TTM)—

SectorTechnology

Industry—

CountryGB

Data as of2026-01-06

Moat score

63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Judges Scientific plc's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View JDG analysis

KKR & Co. Inc.

KKR · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$119.9B

Gross margin (TTM)19.5%

Operating margin (TTM)2.6%

Net margin (TTM)14.1%

SectorFinancials

IndustryAsset Management

CountryUS

Data as of2026-01-06

Moat score

67/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into KKR & Co. Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View KKR analysis

Comparison highlights

Moat score gap: KKR & Co. Inc. leads (67 / 100 vs 63 / 100 for Judges Scientific plc).
Segment focus: Judges Scientific plc has 2 segments (51.7% in Vacuum); KKR & Co. Inc. has 3 segments (52.3% in Asset Management).
Primary market structure: Competitive vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Moderate vs Moderate.
Moat breadth: Judges Scientific plc has 3 moat types across 1 domains; KKR & Co. Inc. has 7 across 4.

Primary market context

Judges Scientific plc

Vacuum

Market

Vacuum and surface-science related instrumentation (e.g., UHV/vacuum components and systems, thin-film/surface engineering adjacent tools)

Geography

Global

Customer

Research labs and high-tech manufacturing

Role

Equipment manufacturer

Revenue share

51.7%

KKR & Co. Inc.

Asset Management

Market

Alternative asset management (private equity, private credit, real assets, and related strategies)

Geography

Global

Customer

Institutional and wealth investors (LPs) allocating to private markets

Role

General partner / investment manager

Revenue share

52.3%

Side-by-side metrics

Judges Scientific plc

KKR & Co. Inc.

Ticker / Exchange

JDG - London Stock Exchange - AIM

KKR - New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)

n/a

$119.9B

Gross margin (TTM)

n/a

19.5%

Operating margin (TTM)

n/a

2.6%

Net margin (TTM)

n/a

14.1%

Sector

Technology

Financials

Industry

n/a

Asset Management

HQ country

Primary segment

Vacuum

Asset Management

Market structure

Competitive

Oligopoly

Market share

n/a

3.5%-5% (implied)

HHI estimate

n/a

Pricing power

Moderate

Moat score

63 / 100

67 / 100

Moat domains

Demand

Demand, Supply, Financial, Legal

Last update

2026-01-06

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand Trust

Judges Scientific plc strengths

Switching Costs GeneralBuy-and-build acquisition engine

KKR & Co. Inc. strengths

Long Term ContractsScale Economies Unit CostDeal sourcing and origination relationshipsFloat PrepaymentCompliance AdvantageCapital markets and exit execution capability

Segment mix

Judges Scientific plc segments

Full profile >

Materials Sciences

Competitive

48.4%

Vacuum

Competitive

51.7%

KKR & Co. Inc. segments

Full profile >

Asset Management

Oligopoly

52.3%

Insurance

Competitive

46.5%

Strategic Holdings

Competitive

1.2%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.