VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

* WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON *

NO ADVICE

Monday, December 29, 2025

Stock Comparison

Oracle Corporation vs Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Oracle Corporation

ORCL · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$567.4B
SectorTechnology
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-26
Moat score
56/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Oracle Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View ORCL analysis

Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft

RHM · Xetra

Market cap (USD)$83.3B
SectorIndustrials
CountryDE
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
71/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View RHM analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft leads (71 / 100 vs 56 / 100 for Oracle Corporation).
  • Segment focus: Oracle Corporation has 5 segments (42.9% in Infrastructure cloud services and license support); Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft has 4 segments (36.7% in Vehicle Systems).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Weak vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Oracle Corporation has 7 moat types across 3 domains; Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft has 6 across 3.

Primary market context

Oracle Corporation

Infrastructure cloud services and license support

Market

Enterprise cloud infrastructure services (IaaS/PaaS, cloud database) plus related support

Geography

Global

Customer

Enterprises & developers

Role

Cloud service provider (IaaS/PaaS)

Revenue share

42.9%

Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft

Vehicle Systems

Market

Armored and tactical wheeled/tracked military vehicles

Geography

Global (Europe/NATO weighted)

Customer

Government / military

Revenue share

36.7%

Side-by-side metrics

Oracle Corporation
Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft
Ticker / Exchange
ORCL - New York Stock Exchange
RHM - Xetra
Market cap (USD)
$567.4B
$83.3B
Sector
Technology
Industrials
HQ country
US
DE
Primary segment
Infrastructure cloud services and license support
Vehicle Systems
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
3% (estimated)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Weak
Moderate
Moat score
56 / 100
71 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply, Network
Legal, Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-26
2025-12-28

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Long Term Contracts

Oracle Corporation strengths

Suite BundlingCapex Knowhow ScaleInteroperability HubSwitching Costs GeneralKeystone ComponentTraining Org Change Costs

Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft strengths

Government Contracting RelationshipsDesign In QualificationCapacity MoatSupply Chain ControlDistribution Control

Segment mix

Oracle Corporation segments

Full profile >

Applications cloud services and license support

Oligopoly

33.8%

Infrastructure cloud services and license support

Oligopoly

42.9%

Cloud license and on-premise license

Oligopoly

9.1%

Hardware

Competitive

5.1%

Services

Competitive

9.1%

Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft segments

Full profile >

Vehicle Systems

Oligopoly

36.7%

Weapon and Ammunition

Oligopoly

26.9%

Electronic Solutions

Oligopoly

16.7%

Power Systems (civilian; planned divestiture)

Competitive

19.7%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.