VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

The Procter & Gamble Company vs RTX Corporation

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

The Procter & Gamble Company

PG · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$331.7B
Gross margin (TTM)51%
Operating margin (TTM)24.2%
Net margin (TTM)19.7%
SectorConsumer
IndustryHousehold & Personal Products
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
79/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into The Procter & Gamble Company's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View PG analysis

RTX Corporation

RTX · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorIndustrials
Industry
CountryUS
Data as of2026-01-02
Moat score
69/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into RTX Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View RTX analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: The Procter & Gamble Company leads (79 / 100 vs 69 / 100 for RTX Corporation).
  • Segment focus: The Procter & Gamble Company has 5 segments (35.1% in Fabric & Home Care); RTX Corporation has 3 segments (34.8% in Pratt & Whitney).
  • Moat breadth: The Procter & Gamble Company has 4 moat types across 2 domains; RTX Corporation has 8 across 3.

Primary market context

The Procter & Gamble Company

Fabric & Home Care

Market

Branded fabric care and home care (laundry detergents/additives, dish care, surface/home cleaning, air care)

Geography

Global

Customer

Consumers via retail and e-commerce channels

Role

Brand owner / manufacturer

Revenue share

35.1%

RTX Corporation

Pratt & Whitney

Market

Aircraft engines & aftermarket services (commercial and military)

Geography

Global

Customer

Airframers, airlines, governments

Role

Engine OEM + MRO

Revenue share

34.8%

Side-by-side metrics

The Procter & Gamble Company
RTX Corporation
Ticker / Exchange
PG - New York Stock Exchange
RTX - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$331.7B
n/a
Gross margin (TTM)
51%
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
24.2%
n/a
Net margin (TTM)
19.7%
n/a
Sector
Consumer
Industrials
Industry
Household & Personal Products
n/a
HQ country
US
US
Primary segment
Fabric & Home Care
Pratt & Whitney
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
35% (reported)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Moderate
Moat score
79 / 100
69 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Demand, Legal, Supply
Last update
2025-12-30
2026-01-02

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Installed Base Consumables

The Procter & Gamble Company strengths

Brand TrustDistribution ControlScale Economies Unit Cost

RTX Corporation strengths

Design In QualificationRegulated Standards PipeService Field NetworkCapex Knowhow ScaleGovernment Contracting RelationshipsLong Term ContractsCompliance Advantage

Segment mix

The Procter & Gamble Company segments

Full profile >

Beauty

Oligopoly

17.8%

Grooming

Quasi-Monopoly

7.9%

Health Care

Oligopoly

14.2%

Fabric & Home Care

Oligopoly

35.1%

Baby, Feminine & Family Care

Oligopoly

24%

RTX Corporation segments

Full profile >

Collins Aerospace

Oligopoly

32.1%

Pratt & Whitney

Oligopoly

34.8%

Raytheon

Oligopoly

32.9%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.