VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Thursday, January 1, 2026

Stock Comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation vs Tyler Technologies, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

PH · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$111.4B
SectorIndustrials
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-31
Moat score
71/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Parker-Hannifin Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View PH analysis

Tyler Technologies, Inc.

TYL · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$19.9B
SectorTechnology
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-26
Moat score
66/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Tyler Technologies, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View TYL analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Parker-Hannifin Corporation leads (71 / 100 vs 66 / 100 for Tyler Technologies, Inc.).
  • Segment focus: Parker-Hannifin Corporation has 2 segments (68.8% in Diversified Industrial); Tyler Technologies, Inc. has 2 segments (70.7% in Enterprise Software).
  • Moat breadth: Parker-Hannifin Corporation has 5 moat types across 2 domains; Tyler Technologies, Inc. has 7 across 2.

Primary market context

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

Diversified Industrial

Market

Motion and control components & systems (industrial and mobile applications)

Geography

Global

Customer

OEMs and industrial distributors/aftermarket channels

Role

Component and system designer/manufacturer with aftermarket support

Revenue share

68.8%

Tyler Technologies, Inc.

Enterprise Software

Market

Public sector enterprise application software for mission-critical back-office functions (ERP/public administration, courts & justice, public safety, education, property & recording)

Geography

Primarily United States; also Canada and other international locations

Customer

Government agencies and other public entities (state/local/federal), school districts

Role

Vertical software vendor + implementation/services

Revenue share

70.7%

Side-by-side metrics

Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
PH - New York Stock Exchange
TYL - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$111.4B
$19.9B
Sector
Industrials
Technology
HQ country
US
US
Primary segment
Diversified Industrial
Enterprise Software
Market structure
Competitive
Competitive
Market share
n/a
5%-7% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Moderate
Moat score
71 / 100
66 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand
Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-31
2025-12-26

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

No overlap yet.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation strengths

Distribution ControlDesign In QualificationScope EconomiesOperational ExcellenceInstalled Base Consumables

Tyler Technologies, Inc. strengths

Training Org Change CostsProcurement InertiaSuite BundlingLong Term ContractsData Workflow LockinScale Economies Unit CostBrand Trust

Segment mix

Parker-Hannifin Corporation segments

Full profile >

Diversified Industrial

Competitive

68.8%

Aerospace Systems

Oligopoly

31.2%

Tyler Technologies, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Enterprise Software

Competitive

70.7%

Platform Technologies

Competitive

29%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.