VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Stock Comparison

Thomson Reuters Corporation vs U.S. Bancorp

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Thomson Reuters Corporation

TRI · Toronto Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorIndustrials
CountryCA
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
84/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Thomson Reuters Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View TRI analysis

U.S. Bancorp

USB · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$85.5B
SectorFinancials
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-23
Moat score
62/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into U.S. Bancorp's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View USB analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Thomson Reuters Corporation leads (84 / 100 vs 62 / 100 for U.S. Bancorp).
  • Segment focus: Thomson Reuters Corporation has 5 segments (40.1% in Legal Professionals); U.S. Bancorp has 3 segments (42.8% in Wealth, Corporate, Commercial and Institutional Banking).
  • Primary market structure: Duopoly vs Competitive. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Thomson Reuters Corporation has 4 moat types across 3 domains; U.S. Bancorp has 8 across 4.

Primary market context

Thomson Reuters Corporation

Legal Professionals

Market

Legal research and legal workflow software

Geography

Global

Customer

Law firms, corporate legal departments, and governments

Role

Subscription software + proprietary legal content

Revenue share

40.1%

U.S. Bancorp

Wealth, Corporate, Commercial and Institutional Banking

Market

U.S. corporate, commercial, institutional and wealth banking & advisory services

Geography

United States

Customer

Commercial, institutional, government and wealth clients

Role

Bank / financial intermediary

Revenue share

42.8%

Side-by-side metrics

Thomson Reuters Corporation
U.S. Bancorp
Ticker / Exchange
TRI - Toronto Stock Exchange
USB - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$85.5B
Sector
Industrials
Financials
HQ country
CA
US
Primary segment
Legal Professionals
Wealth, Corporate, Commercial and Institutional Banking
Market structure
Duopoly
Competitive
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
84 / 100
62 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Legal, Supply
Demand, Supply, Legal, Financial
Last update
2025-12-30
2025-12-23

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Data Workflow LockinScale Economies Unit Cost

Thomson Reuters Corporation strengths

Regulated Standards PipeBrand Trust

U.S. Bancorp strengths

Scope EconomiesCompliance AdvantagePhysical Network DensityHabit DefaultCost Of Capital AdvantageSuite Bundling

Segment mix

Thomson Reuters Corporation segments

Full profile >

Legal Professionals

Duopoly

40.1%

Corporates

Oligopoly

25.3%

Tax & Accounting Professionals

Oligopoly

16%

Reuters News

Oligopoly

11.4%

Global Print

Competitive

7.1%

U.S. Bancorp segments

Full profile >

Wealth, Corporate, Commercial and Institutional Banking

Competitive

42.8%

Consumer and Business Banking

Oligopoly

32.5%

Payment Services

Oligopoly

24.7%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.