VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 0 CENTS

Thursday, January 1, 2026

Schneider Electric SE

SU.PA · Euronext Paris

Market cap (USD)
SectorIndustrials
CountryFR
Data as of
Moat score
72/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Schneider Electric SE is a France-based electrification and industrial technology company organized around two reporting segments: Energy Management and Industrial Automation. Its moat is anchored in an integrated architecture spanning connected products, edge control, software/apps/analytics and services (EcoStruxure/Connect), plus a large partner ecosystem that extends distribution and lifecycle support. A growing installed base supports recurring field services and a rising mix of software/digital services (the company frames this as its 'Digital Flywheel'). Key counter-pressures are cybersecurity/regulatory requirements, intense competition and price pressure in standardized hardware, and cyclical industrial capex that can weaken automation demand.

Primary segment

Energy Management

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

2 segments · 8 tags

Updated 2025-12-31

Segments

Energy Management

Energy management and electrical distribution equipment, systems and services (low/medium voltage, building and data-center electrical infrastructure, secure power, grid and energy digitalization)

Revenue

81.6%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

ABBN.SWSIE.DEETNLEGD.PA+2

Industrial Automation

Industrial automation and control hardware and industrial software (PLC/SCADA/DCS, motion/drives, industrial control, digital twin and operational software)

Revenue

18.4%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

SIE.DEABBN.SWROKEMR+3

Moat Claims

Energy Management

Energy management and electrical distribution equipment, systems and services (low/medium voltage, building and data-center electrical infrastructure, secure power, grid and energy digitalization)

Revenue share computed from FY2024 segment revenue (EUR 31,131m of EUR 38,153m). Operating profit share computed from segment Adjusted EBITA excluding Central functions and digital costs (Energy Management EUR 6,865m of EUR 7,906m total segments). Source: accounts-full-year-results-2024.pdf (Note 3.1).

Oligopoly

Ecosystem Complements

Network

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Integrated architecture (connected products + edge control + software/apps/analytics + services) increases solution breadth and cross-sell, improving customer stickiness vs point products.

Erosion risks

  • Platform feature parity from ABB/Siemens/Eaton integrated stacks
  • Customer preference for best-of-breed components and open integration
  • Cybersecurity incidents affecting connected products and trust

Leading indicators

  • Share of revenue from software/digital services and field services
  • Software ARR growth (industrial software and energy software)
  • Attach rate of service offers (e.g., EcoCare-type service contracts)

Counterarguments

  • Much of the stack uses open protocols; customers can integrate multi-vendor components
  • Large projects are often specified by EPCs/integrators who can swap vendors on price/availability

Distribution Control

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

A large global partner/channel footprint improves reach, specification wins, and after-sales coverage in fragmented electrical markets.

Erosion risks

  • Channel partners multi-home competing brands; limited exclusivity
  • Disintermediation by large accounts moving to direct/global framework sourcing
  • Online marketplaces and standardized components reducing channel influence

Leading indicators

  • Partner certifications and active partner count trends
  • Channel mix shifts (direct vs indirect) and partner churn
  • Win rates on specified projects in buildings/data centers

Counterarguments

  • Major rivals also have deep channels; distribution advantage may be marginal in mature markets
  • In large projects, buying decisions may be centralized and price-driven regardless of local channel density

Installed Base Consumables

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Growing installed base supports recurring field services and lifecycle offers (maintenance, upgrades, monitoring), extending customer lifetime value beyond the initial equipment sale.

Erosion risks

  • Third-party service providers compete on price and proximity
  • Remote monitoring and predictive maintenance commoditize over time
  • Customers delay upgrades/maintenance during downturns

Leading indicators

  • Field Services organic growth rate and margin
  • Contract renewal rates for service offerings
  • Installed-base growth proxies (backlog, equipment shipments)

Counterarguments

  • Service is locally competitive and not exclusive; customers can switch service providers
  • Large customers may self-perform maintenance or negotiate services aggressively

Industrial Automation

Industrial automation and control hardware and industrial software (PLC/SCADA/DCS, motion/drives, industrial control, digital twin and operational software)

Revenue share computed from FY2024 segment revenue (EUR 7,022m of EUR 38,153m). Operating profit share computed from segment Adjusted EBITA excluding Central functions and digital costs (Industrial Automation EUR 1,041m of EUR 7,906m total segments). Source: accounts-full-year-results-2024.pdf (Note 3.1).

Oligopoly

Data Workflow Lockin

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Industrial software and digital-twin workflows (design -> build -> operate/maintain) embed into engineering and operations processes, creating workflow/data switching costs.

Erosion risks

  • Interoperability/open automation standards reducing vendor lock-in
  • Customer migration to cloud-native, vendor-agnostic software stacks
  • Aggressive pricing/feature competition from Siemens/ABB/Rockwell and local players

Leading indicators

  • Agnostic software recurring revenue mix and ARR growth
  • Net revenue retention / renewal rates in industrial software
  • Share of projects using digital twin / lifecycle software

Counterarguments

  • Many industrial customers standardize on incumbent automation ecosystems (especially Siemens), limiting share gains
  • Customers can multi-home software tools and keep data portable, weakening lock-in

Ecosystem Complements

Network

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Complementary energy-management and automation offers enable bundled solutions across buildings, data centers, industry and infrastructure, strengthening cross-selling and integrated project wins.

Erosion risks

  • Customers unbundle integrated suites in favor of best-of-breed automation components
  • System integrators/EPCs choose multi-vendor stacks, diluting ecosystem advantage
  • Regulatory/cyber requirements increasing integration complexity and cost

Leading indicators

  • Cross-sell win rates between EM and IA offers
  • Mix of integrated projects vs standalone hardware
  • Gross margin trends in solution-based projects

Counterarguments

  • Integration is often delivered by third-party integrators who can substitute components
  • Competitors also offer broad portfolios and digital platforms; differentiation may narrow

Service Field Network

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Lifecycle services (digital + field) improve retention and provide recurring touchpoints after initial automation deployments.

Erosion risks

  • Local service providers/system integrators competing for maintenance and upgrades
  • Remote/AI-driven diagnostics reducing the advantage of physical field presence
  • Service pricing pressure as customers negotiate multi-year contracts

Leading indicators

  • Services organic growth and margin
  • Service contract renewal rates
  • Share of software/services in Industrial Automation mix

Counterarguments

  • Services are often non-exclusive and tendered; differentiation can be limited
  • Large industrial customers may self-perform service or use preferred integrators

Evidence

earnings_call
Schneider Electric FY2024 Results Presentation - 'From EcoStruxure to Connect' slide

A complete digital architecture ... Connected Products ... Software, Apps, Analytics and Services

Shows the company framing its offer as an integrated connected-products + software/services architecture.

other
2024 Full Year Results Accounts - Note 3 Segment information

Energy Management ... end-to-end technology offering enabled by EcoStruxure.

Management describes Energy Management as an end-to-end technology offering (platform + products).

other
2024 Full Year Results Accounts - Note 3 Segment information

... supported by a worldwide partner network.

Explicitly states the segment go-to-market is supported by a worldwide partner network.

other
Euronext press release - Schneider Electric's 2024 Universal Registration Document now available

... more than a million partners ... ensures our proximity to our customers.

Company-reported partner ecosystem scale supports distribution reach/availability claims.

earnings_call
Schneider Electric FY2024 Results Presentation - Digital Flywheel slide

Double-digit growth in Field Services supported by increasing installed-based

Directly links field services growth to the installed base, consistent with installed-base monetization.

Showing 5 of 12 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Platform feature parity from ABB/Siemens/Eaton integrated stacks
  • Customer preference for best-of-breed components and open integration
  • Cybersecurity incidents affecting connected products and trust
  • Channel partners multi-home competing brands; limited exclusivity
  • Disintermediation by large accounts moving to direct/global framework sourcing
  • Online marketplaces and standardized components reducing channel influence

Leading indicators

  • Share of revenue from software/digital services and field services
  • Software ARR growth (industrial software and energy software)
  • Attach rate of service offers (e.g., EcoCare-type service contracts)
  • Partner certifications and active partner count trends
  • Channel mix shifts (direct vs indirect) and partner churn
  • Win rates on specified projects in buildings/data centers
Created 2025-12-31
Updated 2025-12-31

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.