VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Stock Comparison

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. vs Julius Baer Gruppe AG

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.

002352 · Shenzhen Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$27.4B
SectorIndustrials
CountryCN
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
75/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 002352 analysis

Julius Baer Gruppe AG

BAER · SIX Swiss Exchange

Market cap (USD)$13.9B
SectorFinancials
CountryCH
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
59/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Julius Baer Gruppe AG's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View BAER analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. leads (75 / 100 vs 59 / 100 for Julius Baer Gruppe AG).
  • Segment focus: S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. has 7 segments (43% in Time-definite Express); Julius Baer Gruppe AG has 1 segment (100% in Wealth Management (Private Banking)).
  • Primary market structure: Quasi-Monopoly vs Competitive. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. has 9 moat types across 3 domains; Julius Baer Gruppe AG has 5 across 4.

Primary market context

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.

Time-definite Express

Market

Premium time-definite parcel express delivery services

Geography

China

Customer

B2B, B2C

Role

Integrated parcel pickup, sorting, line-haul, and last-mile delivery

Revenue share

43%

Julius Baer Gruppe AG

Wealth Management (Private Banking)

Market

Private banking and wealth management services

Geography

Global (focus: Switzerland, Europe, Asia)

Customer

High-net-worth and ultra-high-net-worth individuals

Role

Wealth manager / private bank (advisory + discretionary mandates)

Revenue share

100%

Side-by-side metrics

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.
Julius Baer Gruppe AG
Ticker / Exchange
002352 - Shenzhen Stock Exchange
BAER - SIX Swiss Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$27.4B
$13.9B
Sector
Industrials
Financials
HQ country
CN
CH
Primary segment
Time-definite Express
Wealth Management (Private Banking)
Market structure
Quasi-Monopoly
Competitive
Market share
64.1% (reported)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
75 / 100
59 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand, Network
Demand, Supply, Legal, Financial
Last update
2025-12-28
2025-12-30

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand TrustService Field NetworkSwitching Costs General

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. strengths

Physical Network DensityScale Economies Unit CostOperational ExcellenceTwo Sided NetworkScope EconomiesNon-core ancillary activities

Julius Baer Gruppe AG strengths

Compliance AdvantageCost Of Capital Advantage

Segment mix

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. segments

Full profile >

Time-definite Express

Quasi-Monopoly

43%

Economy Express

Oligopoly

10%

LTL Freight

Competitive

13%

Cold Chain & Pharmaceutical

Competitive

3%

Intra-city On-demand

Oligopoly

3%

Supply Chain & International

Competitive

25%

Other (Non-logistics & Undistributed Units)

Competitive

3%

Julius Baer Gruppe AG segments

Full profile >

Wealth Management (Private Banking)

Competitive

100%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.