VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Stock Comparison

Oriental Land Co., Ltd. vs Northrop Grumman Corporation

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Oriental Land Co., Ltd.

4661 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
95/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Oriental Land Co., Ltd.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 4661 analysis

Northrop Grumman Corporation

NOC · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$83.1B
SectorIndustrials
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-26
Moat score
72/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Northrop Grumman Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View NOC analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Oriental Land Co., Ltd. leads (95 / 100 vs 72 / 100 for Northrop Grumman Corporation).
  • Segment focus: Oriental Land Co., Ltd. has 3 segments (81.3% in Theme Park Segment); Northrop Grumman Corporation has 4 segments (28.7% in Aeronautics Systems).
  • Primary market structure: Duopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Oriental Land Co., Ltd. has 5 moat types across 4 domains; Northrop Grumman Corporation has 6 across 3.

Primary market context

Oriental Land Co., Ltd.

Theme Park Segment

Market

Large-scale destination theme parks in Japan (Tokyo Disney Resort parks: Tokyo Disneyland and Tokyo DisneySea)

Geography

Japan (with inbound tourism)

Customer

Consumers (domestic residents and inbound tourists), plus group/agency channels

Role

Owner/operator of theme parks under licensed IP

Revenue share

81.3%

Northrop Grumman Corporation

Aeronautics Systems

Market

Military aircraft systems (manned & unmanned) plus sustainment/modernization

Geography

Global (primarily United States and allies)

Customer

U.S. government and allied governments

Role

Prime contractor and major subsystem supplier

Revenue share

28.7%

Side-by-side metrics

Oriental Land Co., Ltd.
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Ticker / Exchange
4661 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
NOC - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$83.1B
Sector
Consumer
Industrials
HQ country
JP
US
Primary segment
Theme Park Segment
Aeronautics Systems
Market structure
Duopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
62%-65% (implied)
n/a
HHI estimate
5,349
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
95 / 100
72 / 100
Moat domains
Legal, Demand, Supply, Network
Legal, Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-30
2025-12-26

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Capex Knowhow Scale

Oriental Land Co., Ltd. strengths

Content Rights CurrencyBrand TrustEcosystem ComplementsDistribution Control

Northrop Grumman Corporation strengths

Government Contracting RelationshipsDesign In QualificationCompliance AdvantageCapacity MoatSwitching Costs General

Segment mix

Oriental Land Co., Ltd. segments

Full profile >

Theme Park Segment

Duopoly

81.3%

Hotel Business Segment

Oligopoly

16.2%

Other Business Segment

Competitive

2.5%

Northrop Grumman Corporation segments

Full profile >

Aeronautics Systems

Oligopoly

28.7%

Defense Systems

Oligopoly

18.8%

Mission Systems

Oligopoly

24.9%

Space Systems

Oligopoly

27.6%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.