VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Stock Comparison

Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co., Ltd. vs Julius Baer Gruppe AG

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co., Ltd.

600887 · Shanghai Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$26B
SectorConsumer
CountryCN
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
72/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co., Ltd.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 600887 analysis

Julius Baer Gruppe AG

BAER · SIX Swiss Exchange

Market cap (USD)$13.9B
SectorFinancials
CountryCH
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
59/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Julius Baer Gruppe AG's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View BAER analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co., Ltd. leads (72 / 100 vs 59 / 100 for Julius Baer Gruppe AG).
  • Segment focus: Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co., Ltd. has 4 segments (65.7% in Liquid Milk); Julius Baer Gruppe AG has 1 segment (100% in Wealth Management (Private Banking)).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Competitive. Pricing power: Moderate vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co., Ltd. has 4 moat types across 2 domains; Julius Baer Gruppe AG has 5 across 4.

Primary market context

Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co., Ltd.

Liquid Milk

Market

China branded liquid dairy (ambient and chilled milk, yogurt, dairy beverages)

Geography

China (primarily)

Customer

Retail consumers

Role

Branded manufacturer and distributor

Revenue share

65.7%

Julius Baer Gruppe AG

Wealth Management (Private Banking)

Market

Private banking and wealth management services

Geography

Global (focus: Switzerland, Europe, Asia)

Customer

High-net-worth and ultra-high-net-worth individuals

Role

Wealth manager / private bank (advisory + discretionary mandates)

Revenue share

100%

Side-by-side metrics

Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co., Ltd.
Julius Baer Gruppe AG
Ticker / Exchange
600887 - Shanghai Stock Exchange
BAER - SIX Swiss Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$26B
$13.9B
Sector
Consumer
Financials
HQ country
CN
CH
Primary segment
Liquid Milk
Wealth Management (Private Banking)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Competitive
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Moderate
Moat score
72 / 100
59 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Demand, Supply, Legal, Financial
Last update
2025-12-30
2025-12-30

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand Trust

Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co., Ltd. strengths

Distribution ControlScale Economies Unit CostCapex Knowhow Scale

Julius Baer Gruppe AG strengths

Service Field NetworkSwitching Costs GeneralCompliance AdvantageCost Of Capital Advantage

Segment mix

Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co., Ltd. segments

Full profile >

Liquid Milk

Oligopoly

65.7%

Milk Powder and Dairy Products

Oligopoly

26%

Cold Drinks (Ice Cream)

Competitive

7.6%

Other Products

Competitive

0.6%

Julius Baer Gruppe AG segments

Full profile >

Wealth Management (Private Banking)

Competitive

100%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.