VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

Nabtesco Corporation vs KONE Oyj

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Nabtesco Corporation

6268 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$449.5B
Gross margin (TTM)28.7%
Operating margin (TTM)6.6%
Net margin (TTM)5.1%
SectorIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - Machinery
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
91/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Nabtesco Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 6268 analysis

KONE Oyj

KNEBV · Nasdaq Helsinki

Market cap (USD)$37B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorIndustrials
Industry
CountryFI
Data as of2026-01-02
Moat score
63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into KONE Oyj's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View KNEBV analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Nabtesco Corporation leads (91 / 100 vs 63 / 100 for KONE Oyj).
  • Segment focus: Nabtesco Corporation has 4 segments (34.2% in Component Solutions Business); KONE Oyj has 3 segments (40.6% in New Building Solutions).
  • Primary market structure: Quasi-Monopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Weak.
  • Moat breadth: Nabtesco Corporation has 5 moat types across 3 domains; KONE Oyj has 8 across 4.

Primary market context

Nabtesco Corporation

Component Solutions Business

Market

Precision reduction gears (RV reducers) for industrial robot joints

Geography

Global

Customer

Industrial robot manufacturers (OEMs)

Role

Precision motion-control component supplier

Revenue share

34.2%

KONE Oyj

New Building Solutions

Market

Elevator, escalator and automatic building door new equipment (new installations)

Geography

Global

Customer

Property developers and general contractors

Role

OEM + project installation

Revenue share

40.6%

Side-by-side metrics

Nabtesco Corporation
KONE Oyj
Ticker / Exchange
6268 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
KNEBV - Nasdaq Helsinki
Market cap (USD)
$449.5B
$37B
Gross margin (TTM)
28.7%
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
6.6%
n/a
Net margin (TTM)
5.1%
n/a
Sector
Industrials
Industrials
Industry
Industrial - Machinery
n/a
HQ country
JP
FI
Primary segment
Component Solutions Business
New Building Solutions
Market structure
Quasi-Monopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
55%-65% (reported)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Weak
Moat score
91 / 100
63 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand, Legal
Supply, Financial, Demand, Legal
Last update
2025-12-30
2026-01-02

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Compliance AdvantageService Field Network

Nabtesco Corporation strengths

Learning Curve YieldDesign In QualificationBrand Trust

KONE Oyj strengths

Capex Knowhow ScaleNegative Working CapitalInstalled Base ConsumablesSwitching Costs GeneralData Workflow LockinOperational Excellence

Segment mix

Nabtesco Corporation segments

Full profile >

Component Solutions Business

Quasi-Monopoly

34.2%

Transport Solutions Business

Oligopoly

27.4%

Accessibility Solutions Business

Quasi-Monopoly

33%

Other Businesses

Quasi-Monopoly

5.4%

KONE Oyj segments

Full profile >

New Building Solutions

Oligopoly

40.6%

Service (maintenance & repairs)

Competitive

40.6%

Modernization

Competitive

18.8%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.