VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 0 CENTS

Friday, January 2, 2026

KONE Oyj

KNEBV · Nasdaq Helsinki

Market cap (USD)$37B
SectorIndustrials
Industry
CountryFI
Data as of
Moat score
63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

KONE Oyj is a global elevator, escalator and automatic door OEM with a large recurring Service and Modernization base. The strongest moats sit in the aftermarket: a large service base, dense field service organization, and growing connected/digital services that increase stickiness. New Building Solutions is more cyclical and price-competitive, but benefits from engineering scale and advance-payment/negative working capital dynamics. Modernization leverages service relationships and operational processes to address an aging installed base and rising safety and sustainability requirements.

Primary segment

New Building Solutions

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

3 segments · 10 tags

Updated 2026-01-02

Segments

New Building Solutions

Elevator, escalator and automatic building door new equipment (new installations)

Revenue

40.6%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

OTISSCHP.SW6503.T6501.T+2

Service (maintenance & repairs)

Elevator and escalator maintenance & repair services

Revenue

40.6%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

OTISSCHP.SW6503.T6501.T+2

Modernization

Elevator and escalator modernization/retrofit projects

Revenue

18.8%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

OTISSCHP.SW6503.T6501.T+2

Moat Claims

New Building Solutions

Elevator, escalator and automatic building door new equipment (new installations)

Revenue share derived from 2024 sales by business in the KONE Annual Review 2024.

Oligopoly

Capex Knowhow Scale

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Sustained R&D and global manufacturing footprint support product performance, regulatory compliance, and execution in complex projects.

Erosion risks

  • Component standardization reduces differentiation
  • Supplier innovation commoditizes OEM advantage
  • Technology parity among global peers

Leading indicators

  • R&D spend as % of sales
  • Product launch cadence
  • Major projects win rate

Counterarguments

  • Large peers have comparable R&D and manufacturing scale
  • Price competition can overwhelm technical differentiation in standard projects

Negative Working Capital

Financial

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Project contracts can include advance payments and contract liabilities, creating a working-capital funding benefit versus pay-as-you-go models.

Erosion risks

  • Customer payment terms move later in the project cycle
  • Higher cancellations/refunds reduce contract liabilities
  • Higher inventory requirements offset advance payments

Leading indicators

  • Net working capital trend
  • Contract liabilities balance
  • Order cancellations

Counterarguments

  • Advance payments are common across major elevator OEMs
  • Benefit can shrink when markets weaken and customers demand tighter terms

Service (maintenance & repairs)

Elevator and escalator maintenance & repair services

Revenue share derived from 2024 sales by business in the KONE Annual Review 2024.

Competitive

Installed Base Consumables

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Large installed service base drives recurring maintenance revenue, spare parts pull-through, and modernization opportunities.

Erosion risks

  • Independent service providers win maintenance tenders
  • Open monitoring/parts ecosystems reduce OEM advantage
  • In-house maintenance by large property owners

Leading indicators

  • Service base units growth
  • Contract renewal/retention rate
  • Net new service contracts won/lost

Counterarguments

  • Maintenance contracts are often re-tendered and can be switched
  • OEM does not have contractual exclusivity on many sites

Switching Costs General

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Maintenance is safety-critical and relationship-driven; reliability requirements and service history can raise switching friction.

Erosion risks

  • Aggressive price undercutting by competitors
  • Standardized parts reduce dependence on OEM
  • Regulatory changes enabling easier multi-provider servicing

Leading indicators

  • Retention/churn rate
  • Price increase acceptance rates
  • Share of multi-year vs annual contracts

Counterarguments

  • Customers can switch providers, especially in low-rise/standardized equipment
  • Competitive bidding can reduce renewal pricing

Data Workflow Lockin

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Connected services and remote monitoring create data-driven maintenance workflows that can increase customer stickiness and upsell opportunities.

Erosion risks

  • Cybersecurity incidents reduce trust in connected services
  • Third-party IoT retrofits/analytics platforms disintermediate OEM
  • Data privacy regulation limits data use

Leading indicators

  • Connected units as % of service base
  • Connected-services attach rate at contract renewal
  • Digital service gross margin trend

Counterarguments

  • Connectivity can be retrofitted by third parties
  • Lock-in may be limited if monitoring data is portable

Service Field Network

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

A large field workforce and local route density improve response time and efficiency in maintenance and call-outs.

Erosion risks

  • Labor shortages and wage inflation
  • Lower route density in fragmented geographies
  • Independent players matching response times in dense cities

Leading indicators

  • Technician attrition rate
  • Response times / callback rates
  • Service margin trend

Counterarguments

  • Local independents can build dense networks city-by-city
  • Network advantage can erode if service quality slips

Modernization

Elevator and escalator modernization/retrofit projects

Revenue share derived from 2024 sales by business in the KONE Annual Review 2024.

Competitive

Installed Base Consumables

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Modernization pipeline is supported by an aging installed base and by service relationships that surface upgrade needs and generate leads.

Erosion risks

  • Owners defer upgrades during downturns
  • Independent modernizers win projects on price
  • Regulatory/code changes increase rework costs

Leading indicators

  • Modernization order growth
  • Modernization wins from own service base
  • Installed-base age profile in key markets

Counterarguments

  • Modernization is project-bid and competitive; installed base does not guarantee wins
  • Component suppliers and local contractors can offer alternative modernization packages

Operational Excellence

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Standardized processes and modular offerings can reduce downtime and improve project execution efficiency in partial modernizations.

Erosion risks

  • Execution issues causing downtime or callbacks
  • Supply chain disruptions delay projects
  • Technology upgrades become commoditized

Leading indicators

  • Project cycle time
  • Modernization gross margin
  • Warranty and callback rates

Counterarguments

  • Peers can copy modular offerings and processes
  • Customer procurement may prioritize lowest bid over execution quality

Compliance Advantage

Legal

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Modernization is often triggered by evolving safety, accessibility, and energy-efficiency requirements; codes/standards expertise can help navigate compliance.

Erosion risks

  • Regulatory changes that standardize requirements across vendors
  • Compliance costs rise faster than pricing
  • Third-party certification reduces differentiation

Leading indicators

  • Share of modernization tied to regulatory upgrades
  • Certification and audit outcomes
  • Energy-efficiency upgrade attach rates

Counterarguments

  • Competitors also maintain codes/standards expertise
  • Compliance is a requirement, not always a differentiator

Evidence

other
KONE Annual Review 2024 - KONE business model

R&D spend 1.8% of sales

Company-reported R&D intensity and engineering scale support knowhow/scale in new equipment.

other
KONE Annual Review 2024 - KONE business model

KONE describes negative working capital and operating with advance payments across businesses.

other
KONE Annual Review 2024 - Notes to consolidated financial statements (contract liabilities)

Defines advance payments and deferred revenue in new equipment contracts, consistent with negative working-capital dynamics.

other
KONE Annual Review 2024 - KONE business model

well over 1.7 million units

KONE reports a very large service base, which underpins recurring service economics.

other
KONE Annual Review 2024 - KONE business model

>90% annual retention rate

KONE cites long and stable customer relationships with high retention, consistent with switching friction.

Showing 5 of 9 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Component standardization reduces differentiation
  • Supplier innovation commoditizes OEM advantage
  • Technology parity among global peers
  • Customer payment terms move later in the project cycle
  • Higher cancellations/refunds reduce contract liabilities
  • Higher inventory requirements offset advance payments

Leading indicators

  • R&D spend as % of sales
  • Product launch cadence
  • Major projects win rate
  • Net working capital trend
  • Contract liabilities balance
  • Order cancellations
Created 2026-01-02
Updated 2026-01-02

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.