★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

Stock Profile

KONE Oyj (KNEBV) Moat Analysis

KONE Oyj

KNEBV · Nasdaq Helsinki

Market cap (USD)$31.4B
SectorIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - Machinery
CountryFI
Data as of
Moat score
81/ 100

Partial score covering 65% of segment weight.

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

KONE is a global elevator, escalator and automatic-door OEM. H1 2026 revenue comprised New Building Solutions (34.7%), Service (46.4%) and Modernization (18.9%). The proven moat sits in aftermarket service: a growing installed base, roughly 90% annual retention and 44% connected-equipment penetration support recurring contracts and data-based maintenance. The installed-base score is strong rather than dominant because contracts are retenderable and independent providers can service many sites. Modernization can turn aging units and service relationships into upgrades, but projects remain contestable. New Building Solutions is moatless: project advances benefit cash flow but are common industry economics. KONE's proposed combination with TK Elevator has shareholder approval but requires regulatory approvals and is expected to complete no earlier than Q2 2027, so TKE is excluded from the current segment model.

Primary segment

Service (maintenance & repairs)

Market structure

Competitive

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

3 segments · 10 tags

Updated 2026-08-23

Segments

New Building Solutions

Elevator, escalator and automatic building door new equipment (new installations)

Revenue

34.7%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

OTISSCHP.SW6503.T6501.T+2

Service (maintenance & repairs)

Elevator and escalator maintenance & repair services

Revenue

46.4%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

OTISSCHP.SW6503.T6501.T+2

Modernization

Elevator and escalator modernization/retrofit projects

Revenue

18.9%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

OTISSCHP.SW6503.T6501.T+2

Moat Claims

New Building Solutions

Elevator, escalator and automatic building door new equipment (new installations)

Revenue share is derived from H1 2026 sales by business: EUR 1,957.9 million of EUR 5,645.9 million total sales. KONE does not disclose operating profit by business. Net working capital was EUR -877.0 million at June 30, aided by advance payments, but this common elevator-project funding model is not scored as a relative moat.

Oligopoly

Insufficient segment-specific evidence to assign a moat claim.

Service (maintenance & repairs)

Elevator and escalator maintenance & repair services

Revenue share is derived from H1 2026 sales by business: EUR 2,619.0 million of EUR 5,645.9 million total sales. KONE does not disclose operating profit by business. Service sales grew 6.6% at comparable exchange rates, driven by service-base growth, repairs, pricing, and value-added services.

Competitive

Installed Base Consumables

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 5 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Large installed service base drives recurring maintenance revenue, spare parts pull-through, and modernization opportunities.

Installed Base Consumables moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Independent service providers win maintenance tenders
  • Open monitoring/parts ecosystems reduce OEM advantage
  • In-house maintenance by large property owners

Leading indicators

  • Service base units growth
  • Contract renewal/retention rate
  • Net new service contracts won/lost

Counterarguments

  • Maintenance contracts are often re-tendered and can be switched
  • OEM does not have contractual exclusivity on many sites

Switching Costs General

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Maintenance is safety-critical and relationship-driven; reliability requirements and service history can raise switching friction.

Switching Costs General moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Aggressive price undercutting by competitors
  • Standardized parts reduce dependence on OEM
  • Regulatory changes enabling easier multi-provider servicing

Leading indicators

  • Retention/churn rate
  • Price increase acceptance rates
  • Share of multi-year vs annual contracts

Counterarguments

  • Customers can switch providers, especially in low-rise/standardized equipment
  • Competitive bidding can reduce renewal pricing

Data Workflow Lockin

Demand

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Connected services and remote monitoring create data-driven maintenance workflows that can increase customer stickiness and upsell opportunities.

Data Workflow Lockin moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Cybersecurity incidents reduce trust in connected services
  • Third-party IoT retrofits/analytics platforms disintermediate OEM
  • Data privacy regulation limits data use

Leading indicators

  • Connected units as % of service base
  • Connected-services attach rate at contract renewal
  • Digital service gross margin trend

Counterarguments

  • Connectivity can be retrofitted by third parties
  • Lock-in may be limited if monitoring data is portable

Modernization

Elevator and escalator modernization/retrofit projects

Revenue share is derived from H1 2026 sales by business: EUR 1,069.0 million of EUR 5,645.9 million total sales. KONE does not disclose operating profit by business. Modernization sales grew 8.8% at comparable exchange rates and Q2 orders grew by more than 15%.

Competitive

Installed Base Consumables

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Modernization pipeline is supported by an aging installed base and by service relationships that surface upgrade needs and generate leads.

Installed Base Consumables moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Owners defer upgrades during downturns
  • Independent modernizers win projects on price
  • Regulatory/code changes increase rework costs

Leading indicators

  • Modernization order growth
  • Modernization wins from own service base
  • Installed-base age profile in key markets

Counterarguments

  • Modernization is project-bid and competitive; installed base does not guarantee wins
  • Component suppliers and local contractors can offer alternative modernization packages

Evidence

other

majority of units delivered will end up

KONE describes new equipment deliveries as the main growth driver of its service base, reinforcing installed-base economics.

other

Service sales grew by 6.6% at comparable exchange rates, driven by service base growth

Current sales growth continued to come from the installed service base, repairs, pricing, and value-added services; contracts nevertheless remain contestable.

other

~90% annual retention rate

KONE cites long and stable customer relationships with high retention, consistent with switching friction.

other

share of connected elevators in KONE's service base amounted to 44%

Connected-equipment penetration increased to 44%, enabling predictive service workflows while leaving a majority of the base unconnected.

other

predictive maintenance and data-driven equipment upgrades

KONE 24/7 Connected Services supports predictive maintenance and data-driven upgrades, indicating embedded digital infrastructure.

Showing 5 of 7 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Independent service providers win maintenance tenders
  • Open monitoring/parts ecosystems reduce OEM advantage
  • In-house maintenance by large property owners
  • Aggressive price undercutting by competitors
  • Standardized parts reduce dependence on OEM
  • Regulatory changes enabling easier multi-provider servicing

Leading indicators

  • Service base units growth
  • Contract renewal/retention rate
  • Net new service contracts won/lost
  • Retention/churn rate
  • Price increase acceptance rates
  • Share of multi-year vs annual contracts

Keep the research going

Created 2026-01-02
Updated 2026-08-23

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.