VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

Keyence Corporation vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Keyence Corporation

6861.T · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$87.6B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorTechnology
Industry
CountryJP
Data as of2026-01-02
Moat score
73/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Keyence Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 6861.T analysis

Koninklijke Philips N.V.

PHIA · Euronext Amsterdam

Market cap (USD)$22B
Gross margin (TTM)43.5%
Operating margin (TTM)6.1%
Net margin (TTM)0.9%
SectorHealthcare
IndustryMedical - Devices
CountryNL
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
68/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Koninklijke Philips N.V.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View PHIA analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Keyence Corporation leads (73 / 100 vs 68 / 100 for Koninklijke Philips N.V.).
  • Segment focus: Keyence Corporation has 3 segments; Koninklijke Philips N.V. has 3 segments (48.9% in Diagnosis & Treatment).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Keyence Corporation has 7 moat types across 2 domains; Koninklijke Philips N.V. has 6 across 3.

Primary market context

Keyence Corporation

Sensors & Safety/Static Control

Market

Industrial sensors and safety/static control for factory automation

Geography

Global

Customer

Manufacturers (production/automation teams) and machine builders

Role

Component OEM and application-solution provider

Koninklijke Philips N.V.

Diagnosis & Treatment

Market

Medical imaging, image-guided therapy systems, and enterprise imaging informatics

Geography

Global

Customer

Hospitals & clinics

Role

OEM systems + software + services

Revenue share

48.9%

Side-by-side metrics

Keyence Corporation
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Ticker / Exchange
6861.T - Tokyo Stock Exchange
PHIA - Euronext Amsterdam
Market cap (USD)
$87.6B
$22B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
43.5%
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
6.1%
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
0.9%
Sector
Technology
Healthcare
Industry
n/a
Medical - Devices
HQ country
JP
NL
Primary segment
Sensors & Safety/Static Control
Diagnosis & Treatment
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
73 / 100
68 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand
Demand, Supply, Network
Last update
2026-01-02
2025-12-28

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Service Field NetworkBrand Trust

Keyence Corporation strengths

Design In QualificationLearning Curve YieldOperational ExcellenceDistribution ControlScope Economies

Koninklijke Philips N.V. strengths

Data Workflow LockinInteroperability HubProcurement InertiaInstalled Base Consumables

Segment mix

Keyence Corporation segments

Full profile >

Sensors & Safety/Static Control

Oligopoly

n/a

Machine Vision, Code Reading & Laser Marking

Oligopoly

n/a

Metrology & Microscopes

Oligopoly

n/a

Koninklijke Philips N.V. segments

Full profile >

Diagnosis & Treatment

Oligopoly

48.9%

Connected Care

Oligopoly

28.3%

Personal Health

Competitive

20%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.