VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 0 CENTS

Sunday, December 28, 2025

Koninklijke Philips N.V.

PHIA · Euronext Amsterdam

Market cap (USD)$26B
SectorHealthcare
CountryNL
Data as of
Moat score
68/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Koninklijke Philips N.V. is a global health technology company with three reporting segments: Diagnosis & Treatment (imaging, image-guided therapy, enterprise imaging informatics), Connected Care (patient monitoring, enterprise informatics, sleep & respiratory care), and Personal Health (oral care, grooming, mother & childcare, beauty devices). The strongest moats are workflow/data lock-in in healthcare systems via enterprise informatics and interoperability plus the installed base and service footprint in high-value medical systems. Personal Health relies more on brand trust and attached consumables. Key risks include Respironics recall-related litigation/regulatory scrutiny, hospital capex cycles (including China volatility), and tariff/supply-chain shocks.

Primary segment

Diagnosis & Treatment

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

3 segments · 6 tags

Updated 2025-12-28

Segments

Diagnosis & Treatment

Medical imaging, image-guided therapy systems, and enterprise imaging informatics

Revenue

48.9%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

GEHCSHL.DE7751.JP4901.JP

Connected Care

Patient monitoring, clinical workflow software (enterprise informatics), and sleep & respiratory care

Revenue

28.3%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

GEHCSHL.DEMDTRMD+2

Personal Health

Premium personal health devices (oral care, grooming, mother & childcare, beauty devices)

Revenue

20%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

PGCLUL6752.JP

Moat Claims

Diagnosis & Treatment

Medical imaging, image-guided therapy systems, and enterprise imaging informatics

Revenue share derived from Philips 2024 full-year sales (EUR 18.0bn) and segment sales in the Philips investor presentation dated 2025-05-06. operating_profit_share approximated using segment Adjusted EBITA margin (non-IFRS) shown in the same presentation.

Oligopoly

Data Workflow Lockin

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence

Enterprise imaging informatics (PACS + interoperability) integrated with imaging systems anchors hospital imaging workflows and raises switching costs.

Erosion risks

  • Cloud-native PACS/VNA reducing vendor lock-in
  • Open standards (DICOM/HL7/FHIR) improving interoperability
  • Hospitals pushing best-of-breed point solutions

Leading indicators

  • PACS/informatics renewal win rate
  • Interoperability platform attach rate on imaging deals
  • Software and services recurring revenue mix

Counterarguments

  • Vendor-neutral archives and cloud PACS can reduce switching friction
  • Radiology departments can operate multi-vendor imaging fleets

Service Field Network

Supply

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence

Large installed base supports service contract attachment, uptime guarantees, and upgrade pathways that raise customer switching friction.

Erosion risks

  • Growth of third-party servicing (ISOs)
  • Service/right-to-repair regulation increasing parts access
  • Hospital budget pressure forcing service repricing

Leading indicators

  • Service contract attachment rate
  • Service gross margin trend
  • Customer uptime/SLA performance metrics

Counterarguments

  • Large health systems can insource maintenance
  • ISOs can service mature modalities at lower cost

Connected Care

Patient monitoring, clinical workflow software (enterprise informatics), and sleep & respiratory care

Revenue share derived from Philips 2024 full-year sales (EUR 18.0bn) and segment sales in the Philips investor presentation dated 2025-05-06. operating_profit_share approximated using segment Adjusted EBITA margin (non-IFRS) shown in the same presentation.

Oligopoly

Data Workflow Lockin

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence

Monitoring + enterprise informatics software embed into clinical workflows (alarms, dashboards, documentation), making rip-and-replace costly and risky for hospitals.

Erosion risks

  • EHR/platform consolidation changing integration dynamics
  • Cybersecurity incidents undermining trust
  • Regulatory constraints on data sharing/AI

Leading indicators

  • Enterprise informatics renewal rates
  • Installed monitor fleet expansion in existing customers
  • Net retention of software/services in health systems

Counterarguments

  • EHR vendors can subsume monitoring workflows and analytics
  • Hospitals can standardize on competitor ecosystems at refresh cycles

Interoperability Hub

Network

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence

Vendor-agnostic informatics and interoperability positions Philips as a connectivity hub across heterogeneous device fleets.

Erosion risks

  • Standards-based integration making hubs more commoditized
  • API restrictions by large EHR vendors
  • Cloud platform entrants offering neutral integration layers

Leading indicators

  • Number of third-party integrations supported
  • Interoperability interface volumes per customer
  • Time-to-integrate new device types

Counterarguments

  • Interoperability is increasingly table stakes in hospital IT
  • Independent integration engines can displace proprietary hubs

Procurement Inertia

Demand

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence

Large hospital footprint and embedded monitoring workflows can slow switching, especially when fleets are standardized and staff are trained.

Erosion risks

  • Respironics recall-related litigation/regulatory scrutiny
  • Group purchasing organizations pushing price-based awards
  • Hospital capital spending freezes or tender re-bids

Leading indicators

  • Monitoring contract retention at renewal
  • Win rate in health system tenders
  • Complaint rates / product quality KPIs

Counterarguments

  • Hospitals can switch vendors at fleet refresh cycles
  • Lower-TCO competitors can win despite workflow disruption

Personal Health

Premium personal health devices (oral care, grooming, mother & childcare, beauty devices)

Revenue share derived from Philips 2024 full-year sales (EUR 18.0bn) and segment sales in the Philips investor presentation dated 2025-05-06. operating_profit_share approximated using segment Adjusted EBITA margin (non-IFRS) shown in the same presentation.

Competitive

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence

Trusted consumer brand supports premium shelf/online placement and repeat purchasing in oral care and grooming categories.

Erosion risks

  • Price competition and private label pressure
  • Retailer shelf-space/online ranking shifts
  • Negative reviews from quality issues

Leading indicators

  • Premium mix and ASP trend
  • Product review ratings and return rates
  • Share of branded search / D2C repeat purchase rates

Counterarguments

  • Switching costs are low; consumers chase promotions
  • Competitors can replicate features quickly

Installed Base Consumables

Demand

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence

Installed base of devices can drive recurring attachment sales (e.g., blades, heads), improving repeat economics versus one-time device sales.

Erosion risks

  • Third-party compatible replacement parts
  • Retail substitution toward cheaper accessories
  • Consumer backlash against proprietary consumables

Leading indicators

  • Consumables revenue growth vs device revenue
  • Repeat purchase rates in D2C channels
  • Mix shift toward proprietary vs compatible attachments

Counterarguments

  • Generics can commoditize attachments and compress margins
  • Consumers can switch platforms at the next device purchase

Evidence

investor_day
Philips Investor Presentation

Enabled by industry leading Enterprise Informatics #1 in PACS and inter-operability

Supports workflow/data lock-in via leading PACS and interoperability positioning in imaging informatics.

investor_day
Philips Investor Presentation

Enabled and connected by Enterprise Informatics and services

Shows Philips positions informatics/services as a connective layer across platforms, reinforcing workflow stickiness.

investor_day
Philips Investor Presentation

Market leading installed base

Installed base scale underpins service footprint and recurring services.

investor_day
Philips Investor Presentation

~40% of sales from recurring revenues

Recurring revenue mix is consistent with meaningful service/software/consumables contribution.

investor_day
Philips Investor Presentation

Connected Care - global leader in hospital and ambulatory Monitoring, largest vendor-agnostic Enterprise Informatics

Supports workflow/data lock-in narrative tied to monitoring + informatics footprint.

Showing 5 of 13 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Cloud-native PACS/VNA reducing vendor lock-in
  • Open standards (DICOM/HL7/FHIR) improving interoperability
  • Hospitals pushing best-of-breed point solutions
  • Growth of third-party servicing (ISOs)
  • Service/right-to-repair regulation increasing parts access
  • Hospital budget pressure forcing service repricing

Leading indicators

  • PACS/informatics renewal win rate
  • Interoperability platform attach rate on imaging deals
  • Software and services recurring revenue mix
  • Service contract attachment rate
  • Service gross margin trend
  • Customer uptime/SLA performance metrics
Created 2025-12-28
Updated 2025-12-28

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.