VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Wide Moat Stocks Home My Collections

Stock Comparison

JD.com, Inc. vs ASSA ABLOY AB

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

JD.com, Inc.

9618.HK · Hong Kong Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$334.2B
Gross margin (TTM)9.5%
Operating margin (TTM)1.3%
Net margin (TTM)2.5%
SectorConsumer
IndustrySpecialty Retail
CountryKY
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
64/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into JD.com, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 9618.HK analysis

ASSA ABLOY AB

ASSA-B · Nasdaq Stockholm

Market cap (USD)—
Gross margin (TTM)—
Operating margin (TTM)—
Net margin (TTM)—
SectorIndustrials
Industry—
CountrySE
Data as of2026-01-02
Moat score
76/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into ASSA ABLOY AB's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View ASSA-B analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: ASSA ABLOY AB leads (76 / 100 vs 64 / 100 for JD.com, Inc.).
  • Segment focus: JD.com, Inc. has 3 segments (87.7% in JD Retail); ASSA ABLOY AB has 5 segments (32.9% in Entrance Systems).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Weak vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: JD.com, Inc. has 7 moat types across 3 domains; ASSA ABLOY AB has 4 across 2.

Primary market context

JD.com, Inc.

JD Retail

Market

China e-commerce retail and marketplace (B2C) plus merchant marketing services

Geography

China

Customer

Consumers (end-users) and merchants/brands (sellers/advertisers)

Role

Retailer + marketplace operator

Revenue share

87.7%

ASSA ABLOY AB

Entrance Systems

Market

Entrance automation and industrial door solutions (pedestrian automatic doors, industrial doors, loading dock equipment, service/maintenance)

Geography

Global

Customer

Commercial/industrial facilities via distributors, installers and service channels

Role

OEM + service/maintenance provider

Revenue share

32.9%

Side-by-side metrics

JD.com, Inc.
ASSA ABLOY AB
Ticker / Exchange
9618.HK - Hong Kong Stock Exchange
ASSA-B - Nasdaq Stockholm
Market cap (USD)
$334.2B
n/a
Gross margin (TTM)
9.5%
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
1.3%
n/a
Net margin (TTM)
2.5%
n/a
Sector
Consumer
Industrials
Industry
Specialty Retail
n/a
HQ country
KY
SE
Primary segment
JD Retail
Entrance Systems
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Weak
Moderate
Moat score
64 / 100
76 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand, Network
Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-28
2026-01-02

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand TrustService Field Network

JD.com, Inc. strengths

Operational ExcellenceTwo Sided NetworkPhysical Network DensityScale Economies Unit CostEcosystem Complements

ASSA ABLOY AB strengths

Installed Base ConsumablesSwitching Costs General

Segment mix

JD.com, Inc. segments

Full profile >

JD Retail

Oligopoly

87.7%

JD Logistics

Competitive

11%

New Businesses

Competitive

1.3%

ASSA ABLOY AB segments

Full profile >

Opening Solutions EMEIA

Oligopoly

16.3%

Opening Solutions Americas

Oligopoly

29.4%

Opening Solutions Asia Pacific

Competitive

5.5%

Global Technologies

Oligopoly

16%

Entrance Systems

Oligopoly

32.9%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.