VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Stock Comparison

JD.com, Inc. vs Netflix, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

JD.com, Inc.

9618.HK · Hong Kong Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$335.3B
Gross margin (TTM)9.5%
Operating margin (TTM)1.3%
Net margin (TTM)2.5%
SectorConsumer
IndustrySpecialty Retail
CountryKY
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
64/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into JD.com, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 9618.HK analysis

Netflix, Inc.

NFLX · NASDAQ

Market cap (USD)$387.5B
Gross margin (TTM)48.1%
Operating margin (TTM)29.1%
Net margin (TTM)24.1%
SectorCommunication Services
IndustryEntertainment
CountryUS
Data as of2026-01-05
Moat score
65/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Netflix, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View NFLX analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Netflix, Inc. leads (65 / 100 vs 64 / 100 for JD.com, Inc.).
  • Segment focus: JD.com, Inc. has 3 segments (87.7% in JD Retail); Netflix, Inc. has 1 segment (100% in Streaming entertainment platform).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Weak vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: JD.com, Inc. has 7 moat types across 3 domains; Netflix, Inc. has 5 across 4.

Primary market context

JD.com, Inc.

JD Retail

Market

China e-commerce retail and marketplace (B2C) plus merchant marketing services

Geography

China

Customer

Consumers (end-users) and merchants/brands (sellers/advertisers)

Role

Retailer + marketplace operator

Revenue share

87.7%

Netflix, Inc.

Streaming entertainment platform

Market

Paid streaming video entertainment (SVOD/AVOD)

Geography

Global

Customer

Consumers (B2C); advertisers via ad-supported inventory

Role

Streaming platform operator; content producer/licensor

Revenue share

100%

Side-by-side metrics

JD.com, Inc.
Netflix, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
9618.HK - Hong Kong Stock Exchange
NFLX - NASDAQ
Market cap (USD)
$335.3B
$387.5B
Gross margin (TTM)
9.5%
48.1%
Operating margin (TTM)
1.3%
29.1%
Net margin (TTM)
2.5%
24.1%
Sector
Consumer
Communication Services
Industry
Specialty Retail
Entertainment
HQ country
KY
US
Primary segment
JD Retail
Streaming entertainment platform
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
8.2%-8.4% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Weak
Moderate
Moat score
64 / 100
65 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand, Network
Network, Supply, Legal, Financial
Last update
2025-12-28
2026-01-05

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Physical Network DensityScale Economies Unit Cost

JD.com, Inc. strengths

Operational ExcellenceBrand TrustTwo Sided NetworkService Field NetworkEcosystem Complements

Netflix, Inc. strengths

Data Network EffectsContent Rights CurrencyFloat Prepayment

Segment mix

JD.com, Inc. segments

Full profile >

JD Retail

Oligopoly

87.7%

JD Logistics

Competitive

11%

New Businesses

Competitive

1.3%

Netflix, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Streaming entertainment platform

Oligopoly

100%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.