VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Stock Comparison

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA vs Prosus N.V.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA

CFR · SIX Swiss Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryCH
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
84/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CFR analysis

Prosus N.V.

PRX · Euronext Amsterdam

Market cap (USD)$135.6B
SectorTechnology
CountryNL
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
49/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Prosus N.V.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View PRX analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA leads (84 / 100 vs 49 / 100 for Prosus N.V.).
  • Segment focus: Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has 3 segments (71.6% in Jewellery Maisons); Prosus N.V. has 5 segments (40.3% in Etail (eMAG marketplace + fulfillment)).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Competitive. Pricing power: Strong vs Weak.
  • Moat breadth: Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has 4 moat types across 2 domains; Prosus N.V. has 7 across 3.

Primary market context

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA

Jewellery Maisons

Market

Luxury jewellery (branded fine jewellery & high jewellery)

Geography

Global

Customer

Affluent and high-net-worth consumers

Role

Brand owner, manufacturer and direct-to-client retailer

Revenue share

71.6%

Prosus N.V.

Etail (eMAG marketplace + fulfillment)

Market

Online retail marketplace and fulfillment in Central & Eastern Europe

Geography

Romania, Hungary and other CEE markets

Customer

Consumers; marketplace sellers; brands

Role

Marketplace + first-party retail + logistics

Revenue share

40.3%

Side-by-side metrics

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA
Prosus N.V.
Ticker / Exchange
CFR - SIX Swiss Exchange
PRX - Euronext Amsterdam
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$135.6B
Sector
Consumer
Technology
HQ country
CH
NL
Primary segment
Jewellery Maisons
Etail (eMAG marketplace + fulfillment)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Competitive
Market share
30%-55% (implied)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Weak
Moat score
84 / 100
49 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Network, Supply, Demand
Last update
2025-12-30
2025-12-28

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand Trust

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA strengths

Distribution ControlCapex Knowhow ScaleReputation Reviews

Prosus N.V. strengths

Two Sided NetworkPhysical Network DensityHabit DefaultDesign In QualificationScale Economies Unit CostScope Economies

Segment mix

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA segments

Full profile >

Jewellery Maisons

Oligopoly

71.6%

Specialist Watchmakers

Oligopoly

15.3%

Other (Fashion & Accessories, Watchfinder, ancillary)

Competitive

13%

Prosus N.V. segments

Full profile >

Food Delivery (iFood ecosystem + delivery investments)

Oligopoly

21%

Classifieds (OLX Group)

Oligopoly

12.7%

Payments & Fintech (PayU, Iyzico)

Competitive

21%

Etail (eMAG marketplace + fulfillment)

Competitive

40.3%

Ecosystem & Other ecommerce (cross-portfolio synergies, ventures)

Competitive

5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.