VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

Gartner, Inc. vs Pro Medicus Limited

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Gartner, Inc.

IT · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$18.7B
Gross margin (TTM)68.2%
Operating margin (TTM)15.6%
Net margin (TTM)13.7%
SectorTechnology
IndustryInformation Technology Services
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
74/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Gartner, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View IT analysis

Pro Medicus Limited

PME · ASX

Market cap (USD)$15.5B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorHealthcare
Industry
CountryAU
Data as of
Moat score
80/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Pro Medicus Limited's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View PME analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Pro Medicus Limited leads (80 / 100 vs 74 / 100 for Gartner, Inc.).
  • Segment focus: Gartner, Inc. has 3 segments (81.8% in Insights); Pro Medicus Limited has 2 segments (92.5% in Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)).
  • Moat breadth: Gartner, Inc. has 4 moat types across 2 domains; Pro Medicus Limited has 6 across 2.

Primary market context

Gartner, Inc.

Insights

Market

IT research and executive advisory subscriptions (insights, benchmarks, and expert access)

Geography

Global

Customer

Enterprise executives and teams (technology leaders and business function leaders)

Role

Subscription-based analyst and advisory provider

Revenue share

81.8%

Pro Medicus Limited

Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)

Market

Enterprise imaging / PACS and related modules for hospitals and integrated delivery networks (IDNs)

Geography

Primarily North America; also Europe and Australia

Customer

Hospitals, imaging centers, integrated delivery networks (IDNs)

Role

Healthcare IT software vendor / platform provider

Revenue share

92.5%

Side-by-side metrics

Gartner, Inc.
Pro Medicus Limited
Ticker / Exchange
IT - New York Stock Exchange
PME - ASX
Market cap (USD)
$18.7B
$15.5B
Gross margin (TTM)
68.2%
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
15.6%
n/a
Net margin (TTM)
13.7%
n/a
Sector
Technology
Healthcare
Industry
Information Technology Services
n/a
HQ country
US
AU
Primary segment
Insights
Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
55% (implied)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Strong
Moat score
74 / 100
80 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Network
Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-30
2026-01-02

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Switching Costs GeneralSuite Bundling

Gartner, Inc. strengths

Brand TrustTwo Sided Network

Pro Medicus Limited strengths

Data Workflow LockinKeystone ComponentOperational ExcellenceLong Term Contracts

Segment mix

Gartner, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Insights

Oligopoly

81.8%

Conferences

Competitive

9.3%

Consulting

Competitive

8.9%

Pro Medicus Limited segments

Full profile >

Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)

Oligopoly

92.5%

Visage RIS (Radiology Information System) and Promedicus.net

Oligopoly

7.5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.