VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

KONE Oyj vs Pro Medicus Limited

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

KONE Oyj

KNEBV · Nasdaq Helsinki

Market cap (USD)$37B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorIndustrials
Industry
CountryFI
Data as of2026-01-02
Moat score
63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into KONE Oyj's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View KNEBV analysis

Pro Medicus Limited

PME · ASX

Market cap (USD)$15.5B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorHealthcare
Industry
CountryAU
Data as of
Moat score
80/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Pro Medicus Limited's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View PME analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Pro Medicus Limited leads (80 / 100 vs 63 / 100 for KONE Oyj).
  • Segment focus: KONE Oyj has 3 segments (40.6% in New Building Solutions); Pro Medicus Limited has 2 segments (92.5% in Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Weak vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: KONE Oyj has 8 moat types across 4 domains; Pro Medicus Limited has 6 across 2.

Primary market context

KONE Oyj

New Building Solutions

Market

Elevator, escalator and automatic building door new equipment (new installations)

Geography

Global

Customer

Property developers and general contractors

Role

OEM + project installation

Revenue share

40.6%

Pro Medicus Limited

Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)

Market

Enterprise imaging / PACS and related modules for hospitals and integrated delivery networks (IDNs)

Geography

Primarily North America; also Europe and Australia

Customer

Hospitals, imaging centers, integrated delivery networks (IDNs)

Role

Healthcare IT software vendor / platform provider

Revenue share

92.5%

Side-by-side metrics

KONE Oyj
Pro Medicus Limited
Ticker / Exchange
KNEBV - Nasdaq Helsinki
PME - ASX
Market cap (USD)
$37B
$15.5B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
n/a
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
n/a
Sector
Industrials
Healthcare
Industry
n/a
n/a
HQ country
FI
AU
Primary segment
New Building Solutions
Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
55% (implied)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Weak
Strong
Moat score
63 / 100
80 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Financial, Demand, Legal
Demand, Supply
Last update
2026-01-02
2026-01-02

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Switching Costs GeneralData Workflow LockinOperational Excellence

KONE Oyj strengths

Capex Knowhow ScaleNegative Working CapitalInstalled Base ConsumablesService Field NetworkCompliance Advantage

Pro Medicus Limited strengths

Keystone ComponentSuite BundlingLong Term Contracts

Segment mix

KONE Oyj segments

Full profile >

New Building Solutions

Oligopoly

40.6%

Service (maintenance & repairs)

Competitive

40.6%

Modernization

Competitive

18.8%

Pro Medicus Limited segments

Full profile >

Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (PACS / CloudPACS)

Oligopoly

92.5%

Visage RIS (Radiology Information System) and Promedicus.net

Oligopoly

7.5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.