VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Thursday, January 8, 2026

Stock Comparison

Koninklijke Philips N.V. vs Tesla, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Koninklijke Philips N.V.

PHIA · Euronext Amsterdam

Market cap (USD)$22.7B
Gross margin (TTM)43.5%
Operating margin (TTM)6.1%
Net margin (TTM)0.9%
SectorHealthcare
IndustryMedical - Devices
CountryNL
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
68/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Koninklijke Philips N.V.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View PHIA analysis

Tesla, Inc.

TSLA · NASDAQ

Market cap (USD)$1.5T
Gross margin (TTM)17%
Operating margin (TTM)4.7%
Net margin (TTM)5.5%
SectorConsumer
IndustryAuto - Manufacturers
CountryUS
Data as of2026-01-05
Moat score
75/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Tesla, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View TSLA analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Tesla, Inc. leads (75 / 100 vs 68 / 100 for Koninklijke Philips N.V.).
  • Segment focus: Koninklijke Philips N.V. has 3 segments (48.9% in Diagnosis & Treatment); Tesla, Inc. has 3 segments (78.9% in Automotive (vehicles + software + leasing + regulatory credits)).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Competitive. Pricing power: Moderate vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Koninklijke Philips N.V. has 6 moat types across 3 domains; Tesla, Inc. has 9 across 3.

Primary market context

Koninklijke Philips N.V.

Diagnosis & Treatment

Market

Medical imaging, image-guided therapy systems, and enterprise imaging informatics

Geography

Global

Customer

Hospitals & clinics

Role

OEM systems + software + services

Revenue share

48.9%

Tesla, Inc.

Automotive (vehicles + software + leasing + regulatory credits)

Market

Battery-electric passenger vehicles (BEV) and connected vehicle software

Geography

United States (market share datapoint); global competition

Customer

Consumers and small fleets

Role

OEM (design, manufacture, direct-to-consumer sales)

Revenue share

78.9%

Side-by-side metrics

Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Tesla, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
PHIA - Euronext Amsterdam
TSLA - NASDAQ
Market cap (USD)
$22.7B
$1.5T
Gross margin (TTM)
43.5%
17%
Operating margin (TTM)
6.1%
4.7%
Net margin (TTM)
0.9%
5.5%
Sector
Healthcare
Consumer
Industry
Medical - Devices
Auto - Manufacturers
HQ country
NL
US
Primary segment
Diagnosis & Treatment
Automotive (vehicles + software + leasing + regulatory credits)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Competitive
Market share
n/a
56.7% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Moderate
Moat score
68 / 100
75 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply, Network
Network, Supply, Demand
Last update
2025-12-28
2026-01-05

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Data Workflow LockinService Field NetworkBrand Trust

Koninklijke Philips N.V. strengths

Interoperability HubProcurement InertiaInstalled Base Consumables

Tesla, Inc. strengths

Data Network EffectsCapex Knowhow ScalePhysical Network DensitySwitching Costs GeneralScope EconomiesScale Economies Unit Cost

Segment mix

Koninklijke Philips N.V. segments

Full profile >

Diagnosis & Treatment

Oligopoly

48.9%

Connected Care

Oligopoly

28.3%

Personal Health

Competitive

20%

Tesla, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Automotive (vehicles + software + leasing + regulatory credits)

Competitive

78.9%

Services and Other (Supercharging + after-sales + used vehicles + insurance)

Quasi-Monopoly

10.8%

Energy Generation and Storage (Megapack + Powerwall + solar)

Oligopoly

10.3%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.