VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Thursday, January 1, 2026

Stock Comparison

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. vs United Rentals, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.

002352 · Shenzhen Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$27.4B
SectorIndustrials
CountryCN
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
75/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 002352 analysis

United Rentals, Inc.

URI · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$51.5B
SectorIndustrials
CountryUS
Data as of2026-01-01
Moat score
63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into United Rentals, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View URI analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. leads (75 / 100 vs 63 / 100 for United Rentals, Inc.).
  • Segment focus: S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. has 7 segments (43% in Time-definite Express); United Rentals, Inc. has 2 segments (70.7% in General Rentals).
  • Primary market structure: Quasi-Monopoly vs Competitive. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. has 9 moat types across 3 domains; United Rentals, Inc. has 9 across 3.

Primary market context

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.

Time-definite Express

Market

Premium time-definite parcel express delivery services

Geography

China

Customer

B2B, B2C

Role

Integrated parcel pickup, sorting, line-haul, and last-mile delivery

Revenue share

43%

United Rentals, Inc.

General Rentals

Market

Construction & industrial equipment rental (general line)

Geography

United States and Canada

Customer

Construction and industrial companies, manufacturers, utilities, municipalities, homeowners

Role

Equipment rental provider / fleet operator

Revenue share

70.7%

Side-by-side metrics

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.
United Rentals, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
002352 - Shenzhen Stock Exchange
URI - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$27.4B
$51.5B
Sector
Industrials
Industrials
HQ country
CN
US
Primary segment
Time-definite Express
General Rentals
Market structure
Quasi-Monopoly
Competitive
Market share
64.1% (reported)
9.5%-11% (implied)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
75 / 100
63 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand, Network
Supply, Demand, Legal
Last update
2025-12-28
2026-01-01

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Physical Network DensityBrand TrustOperational ExcellenceService Field NetworkScope Economies

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. strengths

Scale Economies Unit CostTwo Sided NetworkSwitching Costs GeneralNon-core ancillary activities

United Rentals, Inc. strengths

Preferential Input AccessData Workflow LockinCompliance AdvantageCapacity Moat

Segment mix

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. segments

Full profile >

Time-definite Express

Quasi-Monopoly

43%

Economy Express

Oligopoly

10%

LTL Freight

Competitive

13%

Cold Chain & Pharmaceutical

Competitive

3%

Intra-city On-demand

Oligopoly

3%

Supply Chain & International

Competitive

25%

Other (Non-logistics & Undistributed Units)

Competitive

3%

United Rentals, Inc. segments

Full profile >

General Rentals

Competitive

70.7%

Specialty

Competitive

29.3%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.