VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★
PRICE: 0 CENTS
Thursday, January 1, 2026
United Rentals, Inc.
URI · New York Stock Exchange
Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.
Request update
Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.
Overview
United Rentals is a North American equipment rental leader with two reporting segments: General Rentals (broad construction and industrial equipment) and Specialty (trench safety, power & HVAC, fluid solutions, storage, and surface protection). The core moat is scale - dense locations and fleet mobility improve availability and logistics economics, and purchasing power improves fleet acquisition terms. Workflow tools like Total Control and key-account programs can embed the company in customers' procurement and equipment-management workflows. Specialty adds service- and compliance-intensive offerings where engineered solutions and field support can differentiate beyond commodity rentals. The main counterweights are cyclicality (construction/industrial), intense price competition in a fragmented market, and the capital intensity of maintaining high utilization.
Primary segment
General Rentals
Market structure
Competitive
Market share
9.5%-11% (implied)
HHI: —
Coverage
2 segments · 8 tags
Updated 2026-01-01
Segments
General Rentals
Construction & industrial equipment rental (general line)
Revenue
70.7%
Structure
Competitive
Pricing
moderate
Share
9.5%-11% (implied)
Peers
Specialty
Specialty equipment rental (trench safety, power & HVAC, fluid solutions, storage, mats)
Revenue
29.3%
Structure
Competitive
Pricing
strong
Share
4%-5.5% (implied)
Peers
Moat Claims
General Rentals
Construction & industrial equipment rental (general line)
Revenue share computed from FY2024 segment total revenue: General Rentals $10,845M of $15,345M (United Rentals FY2024 Form 10-K). Equipment rentals were 82% of segment revenue in FY2024.
Physical Network Density
Supply
Physical Network Density
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Dense branch/location footprint improves availability and logistics economics (delivery/pickup and fleet mobility).
Erosion risks
- Competitor branch expansion (Sunbelt/Ashtead, Herc)
- Higher delivery and fuel costs reducing logistics advantage
- Local competitors winning on proximity/relationships in smaller markets
Leading indicators
- Rental locations count and geographic coverage
- Fleet utilization and time utilization
- Delivery/pickup performance and customer satisfaction
Counterarguments
- Local rental houses can match proximity and may provide better service in specific micro-markets
- Network advantage only matters if utilization and logistics execution are consistently superior
Preferential Input Access
Supply
Preferential Input Access
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Scale purchasing improves fleet acquisition economics (pricing, warranty/terms) and supply assurance.
Erosion risks
- OEMs tighten allocations or change channel strategy
- Competitors gain scale via acquisitions and narrow purchasing gap
- Supply chain shocks limiting equipment availability
Leading indicators
- Fleet capex terms and lead times vs peers
- Gross margin trend in equipment rentals
- Repair and maintenance expense as % of rental revenue
Counterarguments
- Large competitors can obtain similar OEM terms; purchasing advantages may not be exclusive
- In oversupplied cycles, supplier pricing power can flip and reduce purchasing benefits
Data Workflow Lockin
Demand
Data Workflow Lockin
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Total Control embeds rental management into customer workflows (including ERP integration), increasing switching friction for key accounts.
Erosion risks
- Customers standardize on independent rental-management software
- Competitors offer comparable digital platforms and integrations
- APIs and data portability reduce switching friction
Leading indicators
- Digital transaction mix and online reservations
- Key account retention and growth
- Total Control user adoption (if disclosed)
Counterarguments
- Many customers still multi-source rentals, limiting true lock-in
- Software features can be replicated and may not drive long-term differentiation
Operational Excellence
Supply
Operational Excellence
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Scale operations plus IT systems and process discipline support utilization, maintenance efficiency, and consistent customer service.
Erosion risks
- Execution complexity from acquisitions and rapid growth
- Labor shortages and wage inflation in field service roles
- IT outages or cybersecurity incidents
Leading indicators
- Fleet productivity and utilization metrics
- Maintenance cost per OEC and turnaround time
- SG&A as % of revenue
Counterarguments
- Operational best practices can be replicated; not a permanent differentiator
- Scale can also create bureaucracy and slower local responsiveness
Brand Trust
Demand
Brand Trust
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Brand recognition and perceived reliability support customer acquisition and repeat business in a fragmented market.
Erosion risks
- Service quality deterioration (availability, delivery delays)
- Safety incidents or reputational damage
- Price-based competition overwhelming brand preference
Leading indicators
- Customer retention and repeat-rental behavior
- Service quality metrics and complaint rates
- Safety performance (recordable incidents)
Counterarguments
- B2B rental decisions can be driven primarily by availability and price, limiting brand impact
- Local relationships may outweigh national brand in many regions
Specialty
Specialty equipment rental (trench safety, power & HVAC, fluid solutions, storage, mats)
Revenue share computed from FY2024 segment total revenue: Specialty $4,500M of $15,345M (United Rentals FY2024 Form 10-K). Equipment rentals were 91% of segment revenue in FY2024.
Service Field Network
Supply
Service Field Network
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Specialty lines pair equipment with setup/installation and field support (notably in trench safety), creating differentiated service capability.
Erosion risks
- Skilled labor shortages for specialty installation/advisory roles
- Wage inflation compressing service economics
- Competitors hiring similar expertise or using subcontractors
Leading indicators
- Specialty segment equipment-rental gross margin trend
- Large-project win rate and renewals
- Safety metrics and incident rates on supported projects
Counterarguments
- Engineering/installation services can be replicated via hiring or contractors
- Customers may prefer to self-perform installation and rent commodity equipment
Compliance Advantage
Legal
Compliance Advantage
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Regulatory complexity in excavations/trenching elevates the value of compliant, engineered protective systems and advisory support.
Erosion risks
- Regulatory enforcement variability reduces willingness to pay for compliance services
- Standardized products reduce need for custom engineering
- Contractors internalize engineering/compliance capabilities
Leading indicators
- OSHA regulatory updates and enforcement activity
- Demand for engineered solutions vs standard trench boxes
- Claims/litigation trends in excavation safety
Counterarguments
- Many contractors can comply using standard protective systems and internal engineers
- Compliance is a requirement for all players, not an exclusive advantage
Scope Economies
Supply
Scope Economies
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Breadth across general rentals + specialty lines + tools/onsite services enables single-vendor procurement and cross-selling on jobsites.
Erosion risks
- Customers prefer best-of-breed specialty providers for critical scopes
- Procurement platforms make multi-vendor coordination easier
- Service failures in one line spill over to perception of the full bundle
Leading indicators
- Attach rate of specialty lines to general rentals (cross-sell)
- Key account penetration and wallet share
- Revenue per customer/location (mix shift)
Counterarguments
- Customers can split spend across vendors with limited friction, especially for smaller jobs
- Bundling can be matched by other scaled competitors (Sunbelt/Ashtead, Herc)
Capacity Moat
Supply
Capacity Moat
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Large specialty fleet supports availability for urgent/large infrastructure projects, reducing customer downtime risk.
Erosion risks
- Overcapacity in specialty categories during downturns
- Rapid equipment obsolescence or changing project requirements
- Higher funding costs for specialty fleet expansion
Leading indicators
- Specialty fleet utilization and OEC growth
- Specialty revenue growth vs industry
- Project pipeline indicators (infrastructure/industrial capex)
Counterarguments
- Large fleet can become a liability if utilization falls; smaller specialists may have higher agility
- Customers may source specialty equipment locally if availability is sufficient
Evidence
Our global branch network includes 1,686 rental locations.
Branch density supports faster service and lower transport friction versus smaller/local competitors.
greater flexibility to transfer equipment among locations
Ability to reposition fleet across locations is a key advantage when demand shifts geographically.
We purchase large amounts of equipment, contractor supplies and other items, which enables us to negotiate favorable pricing, warranty and other terms with our vendors.
Direct management statement that scale purchasing provides better supplier terms.
This software can be integrated into the customers' enterprise resource planning system.
ERP integration is a concrete driver of workflow lock-in and retention among large accounts.
Total Control is a unique customer offering that enables us to develop strong, long-term relationships with our larger customers.
Management frames Total Control as a differentiated offering that supports longer-term customer relationships.
Showing 5 of 17 sources.
Risks & Indicators
Erosion risks
- Competitor branch expansion (Sunbelt/Ashtead, Herc)
- Higher delivery and fuel costs reducing logistics advantage
- Local competitors winning on proximity/relationships in smaller markets
- Digital rental marketplaces reducing the importance of physical presence
- OEMs tighten allocations or change channel strategy
- Competitors gain scale via acquisitions and narrow purchasing gap
Leading indicators
- Rental locations count and geographic coverage
- Fleet utilization and time utilization
- Delivery/pickup performance and customer satisfaction
- National account retention and share of wallet
- Fleet capex terms and lead times vs peers
- Gross margin trend in equipment rentals
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.