VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Stock Comparison

Cboe Global Markets, Inc. vs Wolters Kluwer N.V.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Cboe Global Markets, Inc.

CBOE · Cboe BZX

Market cap (USD)
SectorFinancials
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-31
Moat score
76/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Cboe Global Markets, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CBOE analysis

Wolters Kluwer N.V.

WKL · Euronext Amsterdam

Market cap (USD)$23.9B
SectorIndustrials
CountryNL
Data as of2025-12-29
Moat score
73/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Wolters Kluwer N.V.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View WKL analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Cboe Global Markets, Inc. leads (76 / 100 vs 73 / 100 for Wolters Kluwer N.V.).
  • Segment focus: Cboe Global Markets, Inc. has 5 segments (60.8% in Options); Wolters Kluwer N.V. has 5 segments (26.8% in Health).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Moderate vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: Cboe Global Markets, Inc. has 8 moat types across 4 domains; Wolters Kluwer N.V. has 6 across 2.

Primary market context

Cboe Global Markets, Inc.

Options

Market

U.S. listed options exchanges (multi-listed + proprietary index options)

Geography

United States

Customer

Broker-dealers, market makers, institutional investors, retail order-flow intermediaries

Role

Exchange operator (SRO) + derivatives listing venue + market data provider

Revenue share

60.8%

Wolters Kluwer N.V.

Health

Market

Clinical decision support and clinical drug information solutions (point-of-care) for healthcare providers

Geography

Global

Customer

Hospitals/health systems, clinicians, payers, and academic institutions

Role

Software + expert content provider

Revenue share

26.8%

Side-by-side metrics

Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
Wolters Kluwer N.V.
Ticker / Exchange
CBOE - Cboe BZX
WKL - Euronext Amsterdam
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$23.9B
Sector
Financials
Industrials
HQ country
US
NL
Primary segment
Options
Health
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
29%-32% (reported)
85%-90% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Strong
Moat score
76 / 100
73 / 100
Moat domains
Legal, Network, Supply, Demand
Demand, Legal
Last update
2025-12-31
2025-12-29

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Switching Costs General

Cboe Global Markets, Inc. strengths

Contractual ExclusivityTwo Sided NetworkCapex Knowhow ScaleRegulated Standards PipeClearing SettlementIP Choke PointDe Facto Standard

Wolters Kluwer N.V. strengths

Data Workflow LockinBrand TrustSuite BundlingCompliance AdvantageLong Term Contracts

Segment mix

Cboe Global Markets, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Options

Oligopoly

60.8%

North American Equities

Competitive

18.5%

Europe and Asia Pacific

Oligopoly

10.6%

Futures

Quasi-Monopoly

6.3%

Global FX

Competitive

3.7%

Wolters Kluwer N.V. segments

Full profile >

Health

Oligopoly

26.8%

Tax & Accounting

Oligopoly

26.4%

Financial & Corporate Compliance

Oligopoly

20.8%

Legal & Regulatory

Oligopoly

16%

Corporate Performance & ESG

Competitive

10.1%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.