VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

KONE Oyj vs Roper Technologies, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

KONE Oyj

KNEBV · Nasdaq Helsinki

Market cap (USD)$37B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorIndustrials
Industry
CountryFI
Data as of2026-01-02
Moat score
63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into KONE Oyj's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View KNEBV analysis

Roper Technologies, Inc.

ROP · The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Market cap (USD)$46.7B
Gross margin (TTM)69%
Operating margin (TTM)28.1%
Net margin (TTM)20.3%
SectorTechnology
IndustryIndustrial - Machinery
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
67/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Roper Technologies, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View ROP analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Roper Technologies, Inc. leads (67 / 100 vs 63 / 100 for KONE Oyj).
  • Segment focus: KONE Oyj has 3 segments (40.6% in New Building Solutions); Roper Technologies, Inc. has 3 segments (55% in Application Software).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Weak vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: KONE Oyj has 8 moat types across 4 domains; Roper Technologies, Inc. has 7 across 4.

Primary market context

KONE Oyj

New Building Solutions

Market

Elevator, escalator and automatic building door new equipment (new installations)

Geography

Global

Customer

Property developers and general contractors

Role

OEM + project installation

Revenue share

40.6%

Roper Technologies, Inc.

Application Software

Market

Vertical application software for niche end markets

Geography

Global

Customer

Businesses, institutions, and public-sector organizations

Role

Software vendor (SaaS, subscriptions, and related services)

Revenue share

55%

Side-by-side metrics

KONE Oyj
Roper Technologies, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
KNEBV - Nasdaq Helsinki
ROP - The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Market cap (USD)
$37B
$46.7B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
69%
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
28.1%
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
20.3%
Sector
Industrials
Technology
Industry
n/a
Industrial - Machinery
HQ country
FI
US
Primary segment
New Building Solutions
Application Software
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Weak
Strong
Moat score
63 / 100
67 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Financial, Demand, Legal
Demand, Legal, Financial, Network
Last update
2026-01-02
2025-12-30

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Negative Working CapitalSwitching Costs GeneralData Workflow LockinCompliance Advantage

KONE Oyj strengths

Capex Knowhow ScaleInstalled Base ConsumablesService Field NetworkOperational Excellence

Roper Technologies, Inc. strengths

Two Sided NetworkData Network EffectsDesign In Qualification

Segment mix

KONE Oyj segments

Full profile >

New Building Solutions

Oligopoly

40.6%

Service (maintenance & repairs)

Competitive

40.6%

Modernization

Competitive

18.8%

Roper Technologies, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Application Software

Oligopoly

55%

Network Software

Oligopoly

21%

Technology Enabled Products

Competitive

24.1%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.