VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★
PRICE: 0 CENTS
Cablevisión Holding S.A.
CVH · Bolsas y Mercados Argentinos
Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.
Request update
Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.
Overview
Cablevisión Holding S.A. is an Argentine holding company whose consolidated economic exposure is Telecom Argentina, the convergent operator behind Personal and Flow. FY2025 revenue is concentrated in mobile services (~49%), fixed internet (~22%), fixed telephony/data (~12%), cable TV (~11%) and smaller device/other businesses. The moat is mainly local-network density, licensed spectrum, fixed/mobile scale and bundle economics after Telecom acquired Telefónica Móviles Argentina. CNDC data show post-transaction leadership in mobile, broadband, pay TV, fixed voice and corporate telecom, but this also creates the core erosion risk: regulation. Pricing power is constrained by Argentine macro volatility, affordability, AMX/Claro, private local ISPs, pay-TV substitution, satellite broadband and potential divestiture or spectrum remedies.
Primary segment
Mobile Services
Market structure
Duopoly
Market share
58%-58.1% (estimated)
HHI: 5,123
Coverage
5 segments · 6 tags
Updated 2026-05-01
Segments
Mobile Services
Argentina mobile telecommunications services
Revenue
49.1%
Structure
Duopoly
Pricing
moderate
Share
58%-58.1% (estimated)
Peers
Internet Services
Argentina residential fixed broadband and fixed wireless access
Revenue
21.7%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
moderate
Share
45.7%-46% (estimated)
Peers
Cable Television Services
Argentina subscription TV and Flow video distribution
Revenue
11%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
weak
Share
38.9% (estimated)
Peers
Fixed Telephony and Data Services
Argentina fixed voice, data transport, dedicated internet and corporate telecom services
Revenue
12.1%
Structure
Quasi-Monopoly
Pricing
moderate
Share
59%-76.3% (estimated)
Peers
Other Services and Device Sales
Handset retail, fintech services and other digital services attached to telecom customers
Revenue
6%
Structure
Competitive
Pricing
weak
Share
—
Peers
Moat Claims
Mobile Services
Argentina mobile telecommunications services
Revenue share uses FY2025 Mobile Services revenue of Ps. 4,092,162 million divided by total revenues of Ps. 8,328,814 million. Product-level operating profit is not disclosed.
Concession License
Legal
Concession License
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Mobile service economics depend on scarce licensed spectrum and telecom authorizations; the Telefónica transaction widened capacity but also intensified remedy risk.
Erosion risks
- Spectrum return or divestiture remedies from ENACOM or CNDC
- AMX uses pricing and network investment to regain share
- Mandated access or MVNO rules dilute network ownership economics
Leading indicators
- Spectrum-cap remedies
- Mobile access share versus AMX
- Mobile ARPU and churn
Counterarguments
- Number portability lowers consumer switching costs
- A two-player market invites sustained regulatory scrutiny
Scale Economies Unit Cost
Supply
Scale Economies Unit Cost
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
A large mobile subscriber base spreads network, billing, brand and customer-care costs over more lines, but integration execution and regulatory remedies can reduce scale benefits.
Erosion risks
- Customer losses during network and brand integration
- Inflation or foreign-exchange pressure raises equipment costs
- Network quality gaps weaken scale advantage
Leading indicators
- Mobile line count
- Mobile network quality rankings
- Subscriber churn
Counterarguments
- AMX remains a national-scale competitor
- Scale does not prevent price competition in prepaid and mass-market plans
Suite Bundling
Demand
Suite Bundling
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Mobile can be bundled with fixed internet, pay TV and fixed telephony nationally, creating cross-sell and retention advantages unavailable to narrower competitors.
Erosion risks
- Regulators restrict bundled discounts
- Consumers unbundle video and fixed voice
- AMX or local ISPs deepen fixed-mobile bundle coverage
Leading indicators
- Bundle penetration
- Multi-product churn
- ARPU by convergent customer
Counterarguments
- Bundle value is weaker where customers use streaming-only video or mobile-only broadband
- Affordability pressure can reduce willingness to pay for larger packages
Internet Services
Argentina residential fixed broadband and fixed wireless access
Revenue share uses FY2025 Internet Services revenue of Ps. 1,808,527 million divided by total revenues of Ps. 8,328,814 million. Product-level operating profit is not disclosed.
Physical Network Density
Supply
Physical Network Density
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Fiber, HFC and fixed-wireless coverage create local density advantages, especially where last-mile duplication is capital intensive and customer acquisition is neighborhood-specific.
Erosion risks
- AMX and local fiber ISPs overbuild attractive neighborhoods
- Starlink or fixed wireless improves economics in underserved areas
- Capex inflation slows fiber upgrades
Leading indicators
- FTTH homes passed
- Broadband net adds
- Broadband ARPU and churn
Counterarguments
- Broadband is locally competitive and not a national natural monopoly
- Wireless and satellite alternatives reduce dependence on fixed access in some areas
Suite Bundling
Demand
Suite Bundling
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Fixed broadband is the anchor for home bundles with mobile, Flow video and fixed voice, raising retention where Telecom has local network reach.
Erosion risks
- Bundle discount restrictions
- Streaming-only households weaken pay-TV attach
- Competitors replicate fixed-mobile bundles in dense areas
Leading indicators
- Convergent customer penetration
- Broadband churn by bundle size
- Flow attach rate
Counterarguments
- Customers can mix broadband from local ISPs with mobile from AMX
- Bundle savings may be less important than raw broadband price and speed
Cable Television Services
Argentina subscription TV and Flow video distribution
Revenue share uses FY2025 Cable Television Services revenue of Ps. 915,046 million divided by total revenues of Ps. 8,328,814 million. Product-level operating profit is not disclosed.
Suite Bundling
Demand
Suite Bundling
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Flow and cable TV are more defensible as part of broadband and mobile bundles than as standalone pay-TV products.
Erosion risks
- Cord-cutting and global streaming services reduce pay-TV relevance
- Sports and entertainment content costs rise faster than ARPU
- Regulators restrict bundled leverage in local markets
Leading indicators
- Cable TV subscriber count
- Flow usage and attach rate
- Pay-TV ARPU
Counterarguments
- Video has weaker switching costs than broadband or mobile
- Consumers can replace pay TV with standalone OTT services
Physical Network Density
Supply
Physical Network Density
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Cable and HFC plant support local video distribution and broadband co-selling, but the moat is eroding as video delivery moves over the open internet.
Erosion risks
- OTT delivery bypasses local cable networks
- Private local operators and satellite TV compete in selected markets
- Network value migrates from video to broadband access
Leading indicators
- Local pay-TV share
- Cable TV subscriber losses
- HFC-to-fiber upgrade pace
Counterarguments
- Local network density matters less when content can be streamed over any broadband connection
- Pay-TV subscribers are declining structurally in many markets
Fixed Telephony and Data Services
Argentina fixed voice, data transport, dedicated internet and corporate telecom services
Revenue share uses FY2025 Fixed Telephony and Data Services revenue of Ps. 1,011,528 million divided by total revenues of Ps. 8,328,814 million. Product-level operating profit is not disclosed.
Physical Network Density
Supply
Physical Network Density
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Nationwide fixed and backbone reach is hard to replicate and especially valuable for corporate and government customers needing multi-site connectivity.
Erosion risks
- Regulators impose access, divestiture or conduct remedies
- Enterprise customers shift to SD-WAN, cloud networking or wireless alternatives
- AMX and private fiber operators target high-value corridors
Leading indicators
- Enterprise connectivity revenue
- Backbone and access network capex
- Corporate tender win rates
Counterarguments
- The quote reflects third-party testimony rather than a final regulatory finding
- Large enterprise contracts can be contested by specialized network integrators
Switching Costs General
Demand
Switching Costs General
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Multi-site connectivity, government procurement, dedicated internet, voice and data transport create operational switching costs, though large customers can re-tender over time.
Erosion risks
- Contract renewal cycles allow substitution
- Cloud-first architectures reduce dependence on legacy fixed services
- Wholesale remedies make rival enterprise bids more competitive
Leading indicators
- Enterprise churn
- Average contract duration
- Dedicated-internet and data-transport share
Counterarguments
- Enterprise buyers are sophisticated and price-sensitive
- Switching costs are lower for standardized internet access than for customized network services
Other Services and Device Sales
Handset retail, fintech services and other digital services attached to telecom customers
Revenue share combines FY2025 Other Services revenue of Ps. 74,780 million and Sales of Devices revenue of Ps. 426,771 million, divided by total revenues of Ps. 8,328,814 million. Market share is omitted because the segment spans multiple competitive markets.
Distribution Control
Supply
Distribution Control
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Telecom can cross-sell devices, payments and digital services through Personal channels and the subscriber base, but the advantage is adjunct rather than standalone.
Erosion risks
- Mercado Pago, banks and retailers outcompete Personal Pay or device retail
- Handset subsidies pressure margins
- Subscribers use third-party channels for devices and payments
Leading indicators
- Device sales revenue
- Personal Pay active users
- Cross-sell penetration
Counterarguments
- The segment is small and lacks evidence of dominant market share
- Fintech and device retail economics are more competitive than core telecom access
Evidence
Spectrum is a finite resource
The competition authority identifies spectrum as essential and scarce for mobile services.
Mobile Services Lines 41.6
Shows the enlarged mobile base after consolidating Telefónica Móviles Argentina.
the only operator with national capacity
CNDC flags the combined company as uniquely able to offer national quadruple-play bundles.
Total Nacional 63.402.551 100,0% 33,8% 24,4% 58,1% 41,8%
Shows national mobile access shares after combining Telecom and Telefónica.
Its fiber-optic service reaches more than 5.4 million homes
Shows material fixed broadband network reach.
Showing 5 of 15 sources.
Risks & Indicators
Erosion risks
- Spectrum return or divestiture remedies from ENACOM or CNDC
- AMX uses pricing and network investment to regain share
- Mandated access or MVNO rules dilute network ownership economics
- Customer losses during network and brand integration
- Inflation or foreign-exchange pressure raises equipment costs
- Network quality gaps weaken scale advantage
Leading indicators
- Spectrum-cap remedies
- Mobile access share versus AMX
- Mobile ARPU and churn
- 5G coverage and traffic growth
- Mobile line count
- Mobile network quality rankings
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.