VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Saturday, January 10, 2026

Stock Comparison

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. vs Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.

AJG · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$67.9B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorFinancials
IndustryInsurance - Brokers
CountryUS
Data as of2026-01-09
Moat score
69/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View AJG analysis

Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A.

ITX · Bolsa de Madrid

Market cap (USD)$175.9B
Gross margin (TTM)57.8%
Operating margin (TTM)21.4%
Net margin (TTM)15.1%
SectorConsumer
IndustryApparel - Retail
CountryES
Data as of2026-01-06
Moat score
69/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View ITX analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score: both at 69 / 100.
  • Segment focus: Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has 2 segments (86% in Brokerage); Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A. has 3 segments (71.9% in Zara / Zara Home).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Competitive. Pricing power: Moderate vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has 4 moat types across 2 domains; Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A. has 4 across 3.

Primary market context

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.

Brokerage

Market

Insurance and reinsurance brokerage and consulting

Geography

Global

Customer

Commercial, industrial, public sector, nonprofit and other organizations; underwriting enterprises for reinsurance placements

Role

Intermediary / broker / advisor

Revenue share

86%

Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A.

Zara / Zara Home

Market

Fast-fashion apparel and home goods retail (Zara and Zara Home)

Geography

Global

Customer

Consumers (end-users) via owned stores and e-commerce

Role

Brand owner + omnichannel retailer

Revenue share

71.9%

Side-by-side metrics

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A.
Ticker / Exchange
AJG - New York Stock Exchange
ITX - Bolsa de Madrid
Market cap (USD)
$67.9B
$175.9B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
57.8%
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
21.4%
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
15.1%
Sector
Financials
Consumer
Industry
Insurance - Brokers
Apparel - Retail
HQ country
US
ES
Primary segment
Brokerage
Zara / Zara Home
Market structure
Oligopoly
Competitive
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Moderate
Moat score
69 / 100
69 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand
Supply, Demand, Financial
Last update
2026-01-09
2026-01-06

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand Trust

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. strengths

Service Field NetworkData Workflow LockinOperational Excellence

Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A. strengths

Supply Chain ControlDistribution ControlNegative Working Capital

Segment mix

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. segments

Full profile >

Brokerage

Oligopoly

86%

Risk Management

Competitive

14%

Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A. segments

Full profile >

Zara / Zara Home

Competitive

71.9%

Bershka

Competitive

7.6%

Other Concepts (Pull&Bear, Massimo Dutti, Stradivarius, Oysho)

Competitive

20.5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.