VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Sunday, January 11, 2026

Stock Comparison

Evolution AB vs Sika AG

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Evolution AB

EVO · Nasdaq Stockholm

Market cap (USD)$126.8B
Gross margin (TTM)100%
Operating margin (TTM)60.8%
Net margin (TTM)52%
SectorConsumer
IndustryGambling, Resorts & Casinos
CountrySE
Data as of2025-12-26
Moat score
94/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Evolution AB's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View EVO analysis

Sika AG

SIKA · SIX Swiss Exchange

Market cap (USD)$33B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorMaterials
Industry
CountryCH
Data as of2026-01-11
Moat score
69/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Sika AG's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View SIKA analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Evolution AB leads (94 / 100 vs 69 / 100 for Sika AG).
  • Segment focus: Evolution AB has 2 segments (86.1% in Live Casino); Sika AG has 2 segments (85.5% in Construction).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Competitive. Pricing power: Strong vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Evolution AB has 4 moat types across 3 domains; Sika AG has 6 across 3.

Primary market context

Evolution AB

Live Casino

Market

B2B supply of online live casino games (live dealer & game shows)

Geography

Regulated jurisdictions (global; UK data point for concentration)

Customer

Online gambling operators (B2C)

Role

B2B content & platform supplier

Revenue share

86.1%

Sika AG

Construction

Market

Construction chemicals and building finishing systems (concrete admixtures, waterproofing, roofing, flooring, repair, sealants/adhesives)

Geography

Global

Customer

B2B: contractors, installers, distributors/building-material channels, ready-mix and concrete producers, asset owners

Role

Specialty chemicals manufacturer + system provider (specification + application support)

Revenue share

85.5%

Side-by-side metrics

Evolution AB
Sika AG
Ticker / Exchange
EVO - Nasdaq Stockholm
SIKA - SIX Swiss Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$126.8B
$33B
Gross margin (TTM)
100%
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
60.8%
n/a
Net margin (TTM)
52%
n/a
Sector
Consumer
Materials
Industry
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
n/a
HQ country
SE
CH
Primary segment
Live Casino
Construction
Market structure
Oligopoly
Competitive
Market share
50%-60% (reported)
n/a
HHI estimate
5,050
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Moderate
Moat score
94 / 100
69 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Legal, Demand
Supply, Demand, Legal
Last update
2025-12-26
2026-01-11

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Capex Knowhow ScaleCompliance Advantage

Evolution AB strengths

Suite BundlingIP Choke Point

Sika AG strengths

Physical Network DensityBrand TrustService Field NetworkDesign In Qualification

Segment mix

Evolution AB segments

Full profile >

Live Casino

Oligopoly

86.1%

RNG / Slots & Digital Casino Games

Competitive

13.9%

Sika AG segments

Full profile >

Construction

Competitive

85.5%

Automotive & Industry

Oligopoly

14.5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.