Frost & Sullivan vs FXMacroData comparison

Frost & Sullivan focuses on Scores, PMI / ISM, and Retail Sales while FXMacroData specializes in Central Bank Watcher, Interest Rates, and Inflation Rates. They overlap in 2 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

FXMacroData offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Frost & Sullivan requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with FXMacroData and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

Frost & Sullivan is more beginner-friendly with an approachable interface. Both can work for intermediate users.

FXMacroData provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. Frost & Sullivan doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose Frost & Sullivan if you need Frost Radar™: a signature benchmarking framework that scores companies on Growth and Innovation. Reports include the PDF download plus an analyst-led Growth Dialog™ session., and Online research store with single-purchase studies across industries and themes. Deliverables include Frost Radar reports, market and technology studies, and economic trackers, all offered as PDF downloads with list pricing.. Go with FXMacroData if REST API for macro indicators by currency (e.g., `/api/usd/inflation`) returning JSON time-series with `start`/`end` query parameters; indicator docs show an API-key parameter., and Indicator catalog includes GDP gr, inflation, trade balance, unemployment/employment metrics, policy & interbank rates, and government bond yields (by currency). better fits how you invest.

Both cover common asset types. Frost & Sullivan also includes Other. FXMacroData adds coverage for Currencies, and Bonds.

FXMacroData offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Frost & Sullivan uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.