VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 5 CENTS

Tuesday, December 23, 2025

ASML Holding N.V.

ASML · Euronext Amsterdam

active
Market cap (USD)$417.7B
SectorTechnology
CountryNL
Data as of
Moat score
76/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

ASML is the critical lithography supplier to leading chipmakers, with an effective monopoly in EUV systems and a durable moat built on extreme technical complexity, partner-dependent supply chains (notably ZEISS optics), and long development cycles. DUV lithography remains an oligopoly, but ASML benefits from entrenched process integration. A large Installed Base Management business adds recurring, high-value service and upgrade revenue tied to tool uptime and performance.

Primary segment

Installed Base Management (service, upgrades, field options)

Market structure

Quasi-Monopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

3 segments · 8 tags

Updated 2025-12-21

Segments

EUV lithography systems (incl. High-NA)

Extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography systems

Revenue

Structure

Monopoly

Pricing

strong

Share

100% (reported)

Peers

DUV lithography systems

Deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography systems

Revenue

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

NINOYCAJ

Installed Base Management (service, upgrades, field options)

Service, upgrades and field options for installed ASML lithography tools

Revenue

23%

Structure

Quasi-Monopoly

Pricing

strong

Share

Peers

Moat Claims

EUV lithography systems (incl. High-NA)

Extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography systems

Key customers listed are based on Reuters naming major ASML customers; supplier list reflects ZEISS optics and TRUMPF laser involvement in EUV ecosystem.

Monopoly

Supply Chain Control

Supply

Strength: 5/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence

EUV capability depends on tightly coupled, hard-to-replicate subsystems (especially optics). ZEISS SMT is described as an exclusive optics supplier for ASML EUV tools.

Erosion risks

  • Supplier concentration (ZEISS optics)
  • Geopolitical export controls disrupt supply chain

Leading indicators

  • ZEISS SMT capacity expansions
  • EUV/High-NA shipment cadence
  • Critical component lead times

Counterarguments

  • A new optics supplier could emerge with state backing
  • Customers may delay node transitions, reducing EUV volumes

Capex Knowhow Scale

Supply

Strength: 5/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence

High-NA EUV tools are extremely expensive and technically complex, implying large capital and R&D barriers to entry.

Erosion risks

  • State-backed competitor programs (e.g., China EUV)
  • Technology substitution (multi-patterning, advanced packaging)

Leading indicators

  • Competitor EUV prototype milestones
  • Customer EUV layer counts per node
  • ASML EUV backlog / book-to-bill

Counterarguments

  • If a government subsidizes a rival regardless of economics, entry barriers may fall
  • Alternative scaling paths could reduce EUV intensity at the leading edge

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence

Leading chipmakers rely on ASML as the critical supplier of EUV tools; procurement tends to favor proven uptime, yield and roadmap credibility.

Erosion risks

  • Customer dual-sourcing efforts (where possible)
  • Reputation damage from shipment delays or reliability issues

Leading indicators

  • Customer capex allocation to EUV vs alternatives
  • Field reliability metrics (uptime, wafers per hour)
  • High-NA adoption timelines

Counterarguments

  • If ASML misses roadmaps, customers could shift to more multi-patterning or older tools
  • Large customers could internalize more process know-how, reducing vendor leverage

DUV lithography systems

Deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography systems

DUV segment moat is weaker and more contested vs EUV; confidence intentionally lower.

Oligopoly

Switching Costs General

Demand

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 2/5 · 2 evidence

Scanner platforms are deeply embedded in fab process flows (overlay, tooling, matched sets). Switching vendors can require costly re-qualification.

Erosion risks

  • Aggressive pricing from Nikon/Canon
  • DUV technology maturity reduces differentiation

Leading indicators

  • DUV share of net bookings
  • Used-tool and refurbished demand
  • Customer node roadmaps that extend DUV usage

Counterarguments

  • DUV tools are more substitutable across vendors than EUV
  • Cost-sensitive customers may multi-source or pick cheaper tools

Installed Base Management (service, upgrades, field options)

Service, upgrades and field options for installed ASML lithography tools

Revenue share is derived from FY2024 Installed Base Management sales (EUR6.494B) divided by FY2024 total net sales (EUR28.263B) in the same press release.

Quasi-Monopoly

Service Field Network

Supply

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence

Global field service and upgrade capability monetizes performance improvements and supports high tool utilization at customer fabs.

Erosion risks

  • Third-party service providers for mature tools
  • Customers internalize more maintenance capability

Leading indicators

  • Installed Base Management sales growth
  • Upgrade attach rate
  • Spare-part lead times

Counterarguments

  • Independent service organizations can undercut on older tools
  • As tools improve reliability, service intensity may fall

Installed Base Consumables

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence

Large installed base drives ongoing demand for OEM parts, field options and productivity upgrades.

Erosion risks

  • Parts grey market / refurb ecosystem
  • Regulatory restrictions limiting service to certain regions

Leading indicators

  • Service contract coverage
  • Field option revenue mix
  • Installed base growth vs retirements

Counterarguments

  • Customers may source some parts/services from third parties
  • Export restrictions can reduce addressable installed base in some geographies

Evidence

industry_report
ZEISS SMT - High-NA EUV lithography

ASML is the only manufacturer of EUV lithography machines worldwide... ZEISS SMT exclusively supplies the optics for these machines.

Supports EUV single-supplier position + dependence on exclusive optics partner.

other
TRUMPF: Generation of EUV radiation (EUV lithography)

High-performance laser amplifiers by TRUMPF play a central role... In close cooperation with ASML...

Supports that critical laser subsystems for EUV light generation are built in close cooperation with ASML.

news
Reuters: ASML ships second 'High NA' EUV machine

The High NA... machines, costing approximately EUR350 million ($370 million) each...

Concrete price point illustrating the capex barrier and complexity of next-gen EUV.

industry_report
CSET (Georgetown): Tracing the Emergence of Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography

ASML has emerged as the sole supplier of EUV machines...

Independent framing of EUV as a winner-take-all outcome after decades-long development race.

other
ASML story: Busting ASML myths

ASML is the only company that makes EUV... lithography technology.

Company statement of EUV single-supplier status; underpins trust/roadmap dependence.

Showing 5 of 9 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Supplier concentration (ZEISS optics)
  • Geopolitical export controls disrupt supply chain
  • State-backed competitor programs (e.g., China EUV)
  • Technology substitution (multi-patterning, advanced packaging)
  • Customer dual-sourcing efforts (where possible)
  • Reputation damage from shipment delays or reliability issues

Leading indicators

  • ZEISS SMT capacity expansions
  • EUV/High-NA shipment cadence
  • Critical component lead times
  • Competitor EUV prototype milestones
  • Customer EUV layer counts per node
  • ASML EUV backlog / book-to-bill
Created 2025-12-21
Updated 2025-12-21

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.