VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 0 CENTS

Friday, January 2, 2026

Halma plc

HLMA · London Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorTechnology
Industry
CountryGB
Data as of
Moat score
59/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Halma is a UK-listed group of life-saving technology companies organised into three sectors: Safety, Environmental & Analysis, and Healthcare. It targets high-value niches where products are mission-critical or compliance-driven, supporting durable demand despite competitive end markets. The Safety and Environmental & Analysis segments benefit from regulation- and standards-driven requirements and from qualification/integration into customer systems. The Healthcare segment mixes provider-facing devices and OEM channels where design-in and validation can create multi-year lifecycles. Key counter-pressures include large OEM competition, customer concentration in certain niches, and shifts in regulation, procurement, or technology.

Primary segment

Safety

Market structure

Competitive

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

3 segments · 7 tags

Updated 2026-01-02

Segments

Safety

Safety technologies (fire safety, public safety, worker safety, and protection of critical assets/infrastructure)

Revenue

40%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

CARRHONJCISIE.DE+1

Environmental & Analysis

Environmental monitoring and analysis instruments (water/resource quality, pollution monitoring) plus materials/optoelectronic analysis and photonics components

Revenue

35%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

ADHRIEXKEYS+1

Healthcare

Healthcare technologies and medical devices (diagnostics, patient monitoring/analytics, surgical/therapeutic tools, and components sold to medical device OEMs)

Revenue

25%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

ABTBAXBSXMDT+1

Moat Claims

Safety

Safety technologies (fire safety, public safety, worker safety, and protection of critical assets/infrastructure)

FY2025 (year ended 31 Mar 2025): sector revenue GBP 902.0m (40% of Group) and sector profit GBP 217.9m (before allocation of adjustments). Shares derived from Halma CFO review table in the Annual Report.

Competitive

Compliance Advantage

Legal

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Many Safety offerings are sold into stringent, highly regulated end-markets where customers require proven compliance and certification (raising qualification barriers).

Erosion risks

  • Regulatory harmonisation or standardisation lowering differentiation
  • Well-capitalised competitors accelerating certification and price competition
  • Product liability/recall events damaging trust in compliance

Leading indicators

  • Certification/approval coverage by product line (e.g., ATEX/IECEx/UL as applicable)
  • Safety OEM competitive pricing intensity in key geographies
  • Warranty claims and field failure rates

Counterarguments

  • Compliance is often table stakes-multiple vendors can meet the same standards
  • Large competitors can outspend on R&D and route-to-market to win share

Design In Qualification

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Safety solutions are frequently deployed in customer infrastructure and processes; qualification, onsite testing and operational integration increase switching friction once deployed.

Erosion risks

  • Adoption of open standards that make components more interchangeable
  • Customers insourcing or multi-sourcing to reduce vendor dependence
  • Technological substitution (e.g., new sensing modalities)

Leading indicators

  • Installed base expansion vs replacements (mix)
  • Renewal/upgrade cycle timing in major infrastructure verticals
  • Win rates on retrofit vs new-build projects

Counterarguments

  • Many safety components are specified by standards and can be competitively bid
  • Integrators/installers can influence vendor choice and push for lower cost

Environmental & Analysis

Environmental monitoring and analysis instruments (water/resource quality, pollution monitoring) plus materials/optoelectronic analysis and photonics components

FY2025 (year ended 31 Mar 2025): sector revenue GBP 776.6m (35% of Group) and sector profit GBP 185.5m (before allocation of adjustments). Shares derived from Halma CFO review table in the Annual Report.

Competitive

Compliance Advantage

Legal

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Environmental policy and regulation drive adoption of monitoring/analysis, and can raise minimum performance and reporting requirements that favour established suppliers.

Erosion risks

  • Budget cycles delaying regulatory-driven projects (utilities/municipal)
  • Commoditisation of sensors/instruments reducing differentiation
  • Regulatory rollbacks or slower enforcement

Leading indicators

  • Tender activity for water/resource monitoring projects
  • New/updated environmental standards (water quality, emissions, reporting)
  • Organic growth split between regulated vs discretionary sub-markets

Counterarguments

  • Regulation can expand the market but does not necessarily create a durable barrier to entry
  • Low-cost competitors can meet minimum standards and pressure pricing

Design In Qualification

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Application-specific engineering and integration into customer processes/workflows increase qualification effort; once validated, customers may be reluctant to switch.

Erosion risks

  • Standardisation of interfaces and data formats lowering integration friction
  • Customers moving to multi-vendor architectures
  • Rapid innovation by specialist challengers in photonics/analysis

Leading indicators

  • Customer retention on installed instruments (service/calibration pull-through where applicable)
  • Share of revenue from new products launched in last 3-5 years
  • Gross margin trend vs competitive intensity

Counterarguments

  • Some customers can qualify multiple suppliers and dual-source
  • Best-of-breed point solutions can displace incumbents in fast-moving niches

Procurement Inertia

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Long-standing customer relationships can create preferred-supplier dynamics and repeat orders; concentration in a few large accounts can also increase volatility risk.

Erosion risks

  • Customer concentration (loss or slowdown of major accounts)
  • Pricing pressure from large customers as volumes scale
  • Competitive displacement if customer redesigns to alternative components

Leading indicators

  • Revenue concentration metrics (top customer % of revenue)
  • Capacity expansion and utilisation in photonics-related operations
  • Design-win pipeline and backlog in key submarkets

Counterarguments

  • Large customers can switch if a competitor offers superior performance or cost
  • Supplier relationships may reflect temporary demand cycles rather than durable lock-in

Healthcare

Healthcare technologies and medical devices (diagnostics, patient monitoring/analytics, surgical/therapeutic tools, and components sold to medical device OEMs)

FY2025 (year ended 31 Mar 2025): sector revenue GBP 570.4m (25% of Group) and sector profit GBP 130.6m (before allocation of adjustments). Shares derived from Halma CFO review table in the Annual Report.

Competitive

Design In Qualification

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Products are critical to clinical workflows and to meeting standards of care; where sold into OEM channels, design-in and qualification cycles can be long and sticky.

Erosion risks

  • Hospital procurement consolidation increasing price pressure
  • Regulatory changes or adverse clinical evidence impacting product adoption
  • Technological substitution by competing modalities

Leading indicators

  • Share of revenue via OEM vs direct-to-provider channels
  • Contract renewal/retention rates with provider systems
  • Product recalls/adverse event trends

Counterarguments

  • Many healthcare device categories face intense competition and rapid innovation cycles
  • Providers can switch if a competitor delivers demonstrably better outcomes or lower total cost

Switching Costs General

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Training, workflow change and clinical risk management can slow replacement of incumbent devices, especially in specialist niches where trust and continuity matter.

Erosion risks

  • Standardisation and interoperability reducing workflow switching costs
  • New entrants with superior digital features (AI, analytics) winning clinician preference
  • Reimbursement changes shifting purchasing priorities

Leading indicators

  • Customer satisfaction and clinical adoption metrics (where disclosed)
  • New product launch cadence and adoption rate
  • Gross margin trend vs competitive intensity

Counterarguments

  • Switching costs can be low when hospitals standardise and re-tender contracts
  • Digital-first competitors can win if they integrate better with EMR/IT stacks

Evidence

news
Halma press release - E2S acquisition (highly regulated industrial market)

stringent and highly regulated markets

Halma describes Safety-sector products as operating in stringent, highly regulated markets, implying meaningful compliance/qualification requirements.

other
Halma Annual Report and Accounts 2025 - Safety sector case study (BEA)

over 20 years ago

Long-running customer collaboration and use of live sites for testing/validation suggests meaningful qualification and integration dynamics.

other
Halma Annual Report and Accounts 2025 - Environmental & Analysis long-term growth drivers

policy initiatives and environmental regulations

Directly supports regulation-driven demand and compliance-oriented customer requirements in this segment.

other
Halma Annual Report and Accounts 2025 - Environmental & Analysis sector differentiation

application knowledge

Annual Report highlights technical differentiation via application knowledge, consistent with qualification-driven stickiness in niche instrumentation.

other
Halma Annual Report and Accounts 2025 - Environmental & Analysis (photonics customer concentration)

long-standing customer

Annual Report discusses demand from a long-standing hyperscaler customer, consistent with relationship-based repeat procurement in some niches.

Showing 5 of 8 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Regulatory harmonisation or standardisation lowering differentiation
  • Well-capitalised competitors accelerating certification and price competition
  • Product liability/recall events damaging trust in compliance
  • Adoption of open standards that make components more interchangeable
  • Customers insourcing or multi-sourcing to reduce vendor dependence
  • Technological substitution (e.g., new sensing modalities)

Leading indicators

  • Certification/approval coverage by product line (e.g., ATEX/IECEx/UL as applicable)
  • Safety OEM competitive pricing intensity in key geographies
  • Warranty claims and field failure rates
  • Installed base expansion vs replacements (mix)
  • Renewal/upgrade cycle timing in major infrastructure verticals
  • Win rates on retrofit vs new-build projects
Created 2026-01-02
Updated 2026-01-02

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.