VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★
PRICE: 0 CENTS
Sunday, December 28, 2025
Melrose Industries PLC
MRO · London Stock Exchange
Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.
Request update
Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.
Overview
Melrose Industries PLC is a UK-listed pure-play aerospace supplier (GKN Aerospace) organized into Engines and Structures divisions. Engines is anchored by long-duration risk-and-revenue sharing partnerships (RRSPs) on major engine programmes and a certified global repair network, supporting high-margin aftermarket cash flows and qualification-driven switching costs. Structures supplies aerostructures, EWIS and transparencies with embedded positions on major aircraft and multi-year programme contracts, including customer-funded capacity expansions on select defence programmes. Key risks include OEM bargaining power, programme rate volatility, and execution/supply-chain disruptions.
Primary segment
Structures
Market structure
Oligopoly
Market share
—
HHI: —
Coverage
2 segments · 7 tags
Updated 2025-12-28
Segments
Engines
Aerospace engine components and aftermarket repair
Revenue
42.1%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
strong
Share
65%-75% (reported)
Peers
Structures
Aerostructures and aircraft electrical wiring systems (EWIS)
Revenue
57.9%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
moderate
Share
—
Peers
Moat Claims
Engines
Aerospace engine components and aftermarket repair
2024 segment revenue GBP 1,459m and adjusted operating profit GBP 422m (Annual Report 2024, note 5). Revenue/profit shares computed from reported segment totals (Engines + Structures).
Long Term Contracts
Demand
Long Term Contracts
Strength: 5/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 5/5 · 2 evidence
Risk-and-revenue sharing partnerships (RRSPs) are life-of-programme agreements; economics extend across decades and shift into cash-generative aftermarket phases.
Erosion risks
- Engine OEMs insource more work or renegotiate RRSP economics
- Engine platform share shifts away from partnered programmes
- Lower flight hours reduce flight-hour based economics
Leading indicators
- RRSP revenue and cash conversion trend
- Global engine flight hours
- Programme rate changes
Counterarguments
- Engine OEMs have substantial bargaining power and can pressure suppliers on pricing and terms
- Long-duration RRSPs can tie up capital and expose partners to programme execution risk
Design In Qualification
Demand
Design In Qualification
Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence
Flight-critical structural engine components are designed-in and qualified on major civil aircraft/engine platforms; switching typically requires requalification and redesign.
Erosion risks
- New engine architectures change component content
- Aggressive price-downs by OEMs during renewals
Leading indicators
- Share of content on next-generation engines
- New programme wins and qualification milestones
Counterarguments
- On new engine programmes, OEMs can multi-source and shift workshares
- Qualification provides inertia but does not guarantee attractive pricing
Capex Knowhow Scale
Supply
Capex Knowhow Scale
Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence
Advanced manufacturing know-how (notably additive fabrication) plus certifications create technical and regulatory barriers; scaling production requires meaningful investment and process learning.
Erosion risks
- Additive manufacturing capabilities diffuse to competitors
- Technology bets fail to translate into large-scale contracted work
Leading indicators
- Additive production volumes and certified part count
- Unit-cost/lead-time improvements
Counterarguments
- Large OEMs and peers are investing heavily in additive; advantage may be temporary
- Regulatory approvals are necessary but not sufficient for sustained share gains
Service Field Network
Supply
Service Field Network
Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence
Global engine repair centres and certifications support repeat business and operational stickiness in maintenance-driven demand.
Erosion risks
- Airlines and MROs in-source repairs or shift to alternative providers
- Certification setbacks or quality escapes damage credibility
Leading indicators
- Repair volumes and customer count
- Turnaround times, quality metrics, and certification renewals
Counterarguments
- Repair work can be bid out; pricing can be competitive in downturns
- Customer concentration among major operators can limit leverage
Structures
Aerostructures and aircraft electrical wiring systems (EWIS)
2024 segment revenue GBP 2,009m and adjusted operating profit GBP 144m (Annual Report 2024, note 5). Revenue/profit shares computed from reported segment totals (Engines + Structures).
Design In Qualification
Demand
Design In Qualification
Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence
Embedded positions on major aircraft programmes (structures, EWIS, transparencies) create long qualification cycles and high switching costs.
Erosion risks
- OEM rate volatility and work package reallocation
- Quality escapes leading to loss of preferred-supplier status
Leading indicators
- Net new work packages / programme content wins
- On-time delivery and quality metrics
- Production rate changes at Airbus/Boeing/COMAC
Counterarguments
- Airframe OEMs have strong purchasing power and can pressure margins
- Some work packages are multi-sourced, limiting supplier leverage
Long Term Contracts
Demand
Long Term Contracts
Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence
Multi-year contracts and renewals on major programmes support visibility and reduce churn; contract renegotiations can improve terms over time.
Erosion risks
- Contract repricing pressure during renewals
- Programme delays reduce volume-based economics
Leading indicators
- Renewal win rate and repricing progress
- Backlog duration and scheduled delivery rates
Counterarguments
- Long-term contracts can be low-margin if priced aggressively
- OEMs may use volume commitments to negotiate price-downs
Capacity Moat
Supply
Capacity Moat
Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence
Customer-funded capacity expansion on the F-35 canopy line suggests constrained, difficult-to-replicate capability and trusted execution.
Erosion risks
- Alternative suppliers qualify capacity over time
- Execution issues during ramp (yield/quality) undermine trust
Leading indicators
- Ramp milestones and delivery performance for F-35 canopy
- Follow-on customer-funded expansions on other programmes
Counterarguments
- Capacity advantage can be temporary as competitors expand or OEMs diversify sourcing
- Customer funding reduces capital risk but can come with tighter commercial terms
Evidence
RRSPs are life-of-programme agreements... Melrose... [can] partner with OEMs over the 50-year lifespan of an engine programme.
Defines RRSPs as long-duration agreements with high barriers to entry and long-lived cash flows.
Aftermarket... expected to represent c.55% of Engines' revenue in 2025 and... more than 85% of divisional operating profit.
Indicates RRSP portfolio maturing into high-profit aftermarket mix.
Our structural engine components feature on 90% of major civil aircraft today...
High presence across platforms supports qualification-driven stickiness and switching costs.
Engines - ... tier one supplier... structural engineered components; parts repair; commercial and aftermarket contracts.
Confirms the segment scope in flight-critical components plus aftermarket exposure.
FAA approval for our first additively manufactured critical structural component...
Demonstrates certification/qualification hurdles for additive manufacturing in flight-critical parts.
Showing 5 of 11 sources.
Risks & Indicators
Erosion risks
- Engine OEMs insource more work or renegotiate RRSP economics
- Engine platform share shifts away from partnered programmes
- Lower flight hours reduce flight-hour based economics
- New engine architectures change component content
- Aggressive price-downs by OEMs during renewals
- Additive manufacturing capabilities diffuse to competitors
Leading indicators
- RRSP revenue and cash conversion trend
- Global engine flight hours
- Programme rate changes
- Share of content on next-generation engines
- New programme wins and qualification milestones
- Additive production volumes and certified part count
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.