★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

Stock Profile

Linde plc (LIN) Moat Analysis

Linde plc

LIN · Nasdaq Stock Market

Market cap (USD)$225.5B
SectorMaterials
IndustryChemicals - Specialty
CountryIE
Data as of
Moat score
87/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Linde has a durable industrial-gases moat rooted in 10- to 20-year on-site contracts, minimum purchases, price escalation and dense local production networks. Merchant oxygen and nitrogen do not travel economically over long distances, which makes nearby plants and pipelines valuable. Second-quarter underlying sales rose 4%, split evenly between price and volume, while the contractual sale-of-gas project backlog reached $8.1 billion. The Americas remained the largest region, and APAC supplied the strongest underlying growth. Engineering is smaller, project-based and competitively bid, so it does not merit the same moat assessment. Renewal bidding, customer insourcing, energy costs, industrial slowdowns and poor project execution remain the main threats.

Primary segment

Americas

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

4 segments · 6 tags

Updated 2026-08-23

Segments

Americas

Industrial gases (Americas)

Revenue

44%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

APDAI.PA

EMEA

Industrial gases (EMEA)

Revenue

24.8%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

AI.PAAPD

APAC

Industrial gases (APAC)

Revenue

20.1%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

AI.PAAPD4091.T

Engineering

Industrial gas plant engineering & process technology

Revenue

6.7%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

AI.PAAPDTE.PA

Moat Claims

Americas

Industrial gases (Americas)

Q2 2026 sales were $4,083 million and adjusted segment operating profit was $1,272 million. Underlying sales rose 4% from 2% price and 2% volume.

Oligopoly

Long Term Contracts

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 5 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

On-site industrial gas supply is typically governed by long-duration total-requirements contracts with minimum purchase commitments and escalation/pass-through mechanics, improving revenue visibility.

Long Term Contracts moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Contract renewals repriced aggressively in competitive bids
  • Large customers insource via customer-owned plants
  • Volume declines at key industrial end-markets

Leading indicators

  • Net new project announcements / on-site start-ups
  • Disclosed remaining performance obligations / minimum purchase requirement estimates
  • Base volume and price attainment trends by segment

Counterarguments

  • Merchant and packaged gas contracts are materially shorter and more competitive than on-site contracts
  • At contract expiry, customers can re-bid or switch suppliers (especially where multiple producers exist)

Physical Network Density

Supply

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Industrial gases are costly to transport, so dense local footprints of plants, pipeline complexes and filling/distribution sites create cost and service advantages that are hard to replicate quickly.

Physical Network Density moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Competitors build new plants/pipeline capacity near key customer clusters
  • Energy availability or pricing shocks reduce local cost advantage
  • Major customer site closures/relocations reduce network utilization

Leading indicators

  • Regional capacity additions (ASUs, hydrogen plants) by competitors
  • Pipeline footprint expansions / new pipeline complexes
  • Utilization rates and distribution cost per unit

Counterarguments

  • Certain gases (e.g., argon, hydrogen, helium) can be shipped longer distances, weakening local density advantages in those products
  • Large competitors can replicate networks over time given sufficient demand density

EMEA

Industrial gases (EMEA)

Q2 2026 sales were $2,303 million and adjusted segment operating profit was $823 million. Underlying sales rose 1% as 2% price offset lower manufacturing volume.

Oligopoly

Long Term Contracts

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 5 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

On-site industrial gas supply is typically governed by long-duration total-requirements contracts with minimum purchase commitments and escalation/pass-through mechanics, improving revenue visibility.

Long Term Contracts moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Contract renewals repriced aggressively in competitive bids
  • Large customers insource via customer-owned plants
  • Volume declines at key industrial end-markets

Leading indicators

  • Net new project announcements / on-site start-ups
  • Disclosed remaining performance obligations / minimum purchase requirement estimates
  • Base volume and price attainment trends by segment

Counterarguments

  • Merchant and packaged gas contracts are materially shorter and more competitive than on-site contracts
  • At contract expiry, customers can re-bid or switch suppliers (especially where multiple producers exist)

Physical Network Density

Supply

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Industrial gases are costly to transport, so dense local footprints of plants, pipeline complexes and filling/distribution sites create cost and service advantages that are hard to replicate quickly.

Physical Network Density moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Competitors build new plants/pipeline capacity near key customer clusters
  • Energy availability or pricing shocks reduce local cost advantage
  • Major customer site closures/relocations reduce network utilization

Leading indicators

  • Regional capacity additions (ASUs, hydrogen plants) by competitors
  • Pipeline footprint expansions / new pipeline complexes
  • Utilization rates and distribution cost per unit

Counterarguments

  • Certain gases (e.g., argon, hydrogen, helium) can be shipped longer distances, weakening local density advantages in those products
  • Large competitors can replicate networks over time given sufficient demand density

APAC

Industrial gases (APAC)

Q2 2026 sales were $1,870 million and adjusted segment operating profit was $531 million. Underlying sales rose 8%, including 6% volume growth.

Oligopoly

Long Term Contracts

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 5 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

On-site industrial gas supply is typically governed by long-duration total-requirements contracts with minimum purchase commitments and escalation/pass-through mechanics, improving revenue visibility.

Long Term Contracts moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Contract renewals repriced aggressively in competitive bids
  • Large customers insource via customer-owned plants
  • Volume declines at key industrial end-markets

Leading indicators

  • Net new project announcements / on-site start-ups
  • Disclosed remaining performance obligations / minimum purchase requirement estimates
  • Base volume and price attainment trends by segment

Counterarguments

  • Merchant and packaged gas contracts are materially shorter and more competitive than on-site contracts
  • At contract expiry, customers can re-bid or switch suppliers (especially where multiple producers exist)

Physical Network Density

Supply

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Industrial gases are costly to transport, so dense local footprints of plants, pipeline complexes and filling/distribution sites create cost and service advantages that are hard to replicate quickly.

Physical Network Density moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Competitors build new plants/pipeline capacity near key customer clusters
  • Energy availability or pricing shocks reduce local cost advantage
  • Major customer site closures/relocations reduce network utilization

Leading indicators

  • Regional capacity additions (ASUs, hydrogen plants) by competitors
  • Pipeline footprint expansions / new pipeline complexes
  • Utilization rates and distribution cost per unit

Counterarguments

  • Certain gases (e.g., argon, hydrogen, helium) can be shipped longer distances, weakening local density advantages in those products
  • Large competitors can replicate networks over time given sufficient demand density

Engineering

Industrial gas plant engineering & process technology

Q2 2026 sales were $625 million and adjusted segment operating profit was $100 million. Equipment backlog was $3.0 billion.

Competitive

Insufficient segment-specific evidence to assign a moat claim.

Evidence

sec_filing

Describes on-site supply as 10-20 year total-requirements contracts with minimum purchase requirements and price escalation; also discusses large remaining performance obligations tied to minimum purchases and plant sales.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Contract renewals repriced aggressively in competitive bids
  • Large customers insource via customer-owned plants
  • Volume declines at key industrial end-markets
  • Policy support for clean hydrogen projects weakens, delaying new on-site build-out
  • Competitors build new plants/pipeline capacity near key customer clusters
  • Energy availability or pricing shocks reduce local cost advantage

Leading indicators

  • Net new project announcements / on-site start-ups
  • Disclosed remaining performance obligations / minimum purchase requirement estimates
  • Base volume and price attainment trends by segment
  • Renewal win rate and renewal pricing vs inflation
  • Regional capacity additions (ASUs, hydrogen plants) by competitors
  • Pipeline footprint expansions / new pipeline complexes

Keep the research going

Created 2025-12-29
Updated 2026-08-23

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.