VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 0 CENTS

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Veeva Systems Inc.

VEEV · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$47.7B
SectorTechnology
CountryUS
Data as of
Moat score
82/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Veeva Systems is a vertical SaaS company serving the life sciences industry, with revenue grouped into Commercial Solutions and R&D Solutions. The core moat is high switching friction in regulated, system-of-record workflows on the Vault platform, reinforced by compliance-oriented product design and suite depth. Commercial Solutions benefit from entrenched CRM and data workflows but face strong competition in CRM and related data products. R&D Solutions compete across clinical, regulatory, safety, and quality domains; suite bundling supports expansion, but best-of-breed alternatives and platform shifts remain ongoing threats.

Primary segment

R&D Solutions

Market structure

Competitive

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

2 segments · 8 tags

Updated 2025-12-29

Segments

Commercial Solutions

Life sciences commercial operations cloud software and data (CRM, content, omnichannel, reference data, analytics)

Revenue

47%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

70% (reported)

Peers

CRMIQVIPS.PADH+3

R&D Solutions

Life sciences R&D, clinical, regulatory, safety, and quality cloud applications (Vault platform-based suites)

Revenue

53%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

strong

Share

Peers

IQVDSY.PAOTEXORCL+3

Moat Claims

Commercial Solutions

Life sciences commercial operations cloud software and data (CRM, content, omnichannel, reference data, analytics)

Commercial Solutions aligns with the company's Commercial Cloud + Data Cloud grouping for financial reporting. Revenue share reflects the FY ended 2025-01-31 disclosure that Commercial Solutions were ~47% of total revenue. Customer names listed are examples mentioned in the FY2025 Form 10-K (not necessarily the largest by revenue).

Oligopoly

Data Workflow Lockin

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence

Commercial workflows consolidate customer/HCP data, regulated content, and team processes inside Veeva applications, increasing migration and retraining costs.

Erosion risks

  • Successful competitive displacement (especially Salesforce Life Sciences Cloud)
  • Customer push for interoperability and easier data portability
  • Execution risk migrating legacy CRM customers to Vault CRM

Leading indicators

  • Biopharma CRM retention and win/loss in top accounts
  • Vault CRM migration progress vs plan
  • Net revenue retention / renewal rates in Commercial Solutions

Counterarguments

  • CRM functionality can be substituted by horizontal platforms with sufficient life sciences configurations
  • Large customers can multi-vendor and negotiate pricing; switching may be episodic but still happens

Compliance Advantage

Legal

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence

Life sciences buyers often require validated systems with audit trails and e-signatures; Veeva competes explicitly on compliance verification and regulated functionality.

Erosion risks

  • Compliance features become table-stakes across enterprise platforms
  • Regulatory simplification or standardization reduces differentiation
  • Security or privacy incident damages trust in compliance posture

Leading indicators

  • Audit outcomes and customer validation cycles
  • Regulatory changes affecting electronic records / signatures
  • Security incident frequency and severity

Counterarguments

  • Customers can validate general-purpose platforms (e.g., Salesforce/Microsoft) and achieve compliance through process controls
  • Large vendors can match compliance features and outspend on certifications and security

Ecosystem Complements

Network

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence

A partner ecosystem (systems integrators and specialty firms) supports implementation, customization, and integrations, reducing perceived adoption risk for buyers.

Erosion risks

  • Partners prioritize competing platforms or consolidate around a dominant vendor
  • Customers internalize implementation capability over time
  • Product standardization reduces partner value-add

Leading indicators

  • Partner-sourced pipeline and services attach rates
  • Number and activity of certified partners
  • Implementation cycle times and time-to-value

Counterarguments

  • SIs and consulting firms are typically multi-platform and not exclusive complements
  • A strong partner channel does not prevent product-level displacement in competitive evaluations

R&D Solutions

Life sciences R&D, clinical, regulatory, safety, and quality cloud applications (Vault platform-based suites)

R&D Solutions aligns with the company's Development Cloud + Quality Cloud grouping for financial reporting. Revenue share reflects the FY ended 2025-01-31 disclosure that R&D Solutions were ~53% of total revenue. Customer names listed are examples mentioned in the FY2025 Form 10-K (not necessarily the largest by revenue).

Competitive

Data Workflow Lockin

Demand

Strength: 5/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence

Vault-based R&D and quality systems often become regulated systems of record for documents and structured data; switching typically requires data migration, process redesign, and revalidation.

Erosion risks

  • Customers adopt best-of-breed point solutions and integrate instead of standardizing on Vault
  • Data portability standards and migration tooling reduce lock-in
  • Platform disruption (new architectures/AI-native competitors) changes buying criteria

Leading indicators

  • Vault product expansion per customer (more applications adopted)
  • Renewal and expansion rates in R&D Solutions
  • Competitive displacement in major R&D/quality evaluations

Counterarguments

  • Many enterprises remain multi-vendor in R&D/quality and can replace modules over time
  • Large incumbent vendors can bundle and discount to win suite decisions

Suite Bundling

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Multiple R&D and quality applications can run on the same Vault platform, supporting cross-app workflows and making suite adoption economically attractive versus assembling many vendors.

Erosion risks

  • Customers resist single-vendor suites to avoid lock-in
  • Procurement favors lower-cost alternatives for non-differentiated modules
  • Integration platforms lower the pain of mixing vendors

Leading indicators

  • Attach rate of additional Vault apps after initial land
  • Net expansion within Quality and Development suites
  • Average contract size growth in R&D Solutions

Counterarguments

  • Suites can lose to best-of-breed point solutions in specific functions (e.g., EDC, safety, QMS)
  • Bundling may face regulatory or buyer pushback if perceived as limiting choice

Compliance Advantage

Legal

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

R&D/quality deployments are heavily regulated (GxP, electronic records/signatures); Veeva's quality management and built-in compliance features reduce validation burden versus generic tools.

Erosion risks

  • Compliance requirements are met equally well by large horizontal vendors
  • Regulatory changes reduce the need for specialized validated systems
  • Customer security/privacy requirements escalate faster than product capabilities

Leading indicators

  • Customer audit and validation outcomes
  • Product certifications and regulated feature releases
  • Security/privacy incident record

Counterarguments

  • Enterprises can achieve compliance with validated configurations on major platforms
  • Compliance alone is rarely enough to win if workflow fit and UX are weaker than alternatives

Evidence

sec_filing
Veeva Systems Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Jan 31, 2025) - Vault CRM description

single Vault database

Veeva describes Vault CRM as unifying commercial teams on a shared database, implying material data/workflow switching friction.

sec_filing
Veeva Systems Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Jan 31, 2025) - Legacy Veeva CRM platform dependency

supported until September 1, 2030

Veeva discloses legacy Veeva CRM is built on Salesforce's platform through 2030 support; migrations to Vault CRM create both stickiness and execution risk.

sec_filing
Veeva Systems Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Jan 31, 2025) - Principal competitive factors

regulatory compliance verification and functionality

The company lists regulatory compliance verification/functionality as a principal competitive factor, consistent with a compliance moat in regulated buyer workflows.

sec_filing
Veeva Systems Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Jan 31, 2025) - Quality and Compliance Program

Veeva describes an ISO9001-certified quality management system and GxP-style controls (audit trails, e-signatures, validation) for regulated offerings.

sec_filing
Veeva Systems Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Jan 31, 2025) - Services partner ecosystem

Veeva describes services partners (global SIs and specialty firms) delivering program management, training, customization, and integration around Veeva solutions.

Showing 5 of 8 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Successful competitive displacement (especially Salesforce Life Sciences Cloud)
  • Customer push for interoperability and easier data portability
  • Execution risk migrating legacy CRM customers to Vault CRM
  • Compliance features become table-stakes across enterprise platforms
  • Regulatory simplification or standardization reduces differentiation
  • Security or privacy incident damages trust in compliance posture

Leading indicators

  • Biopharma CRM retention and win/loss in top accounts
  • Vault CRM migration progress vs plan
  • Net revenue retention / renewal rates in Commercial Solutions
  • Audit outcomes and customer validation cycles
  • Regulatory changes affecting electronic records / signatures
  • Security incident frequency and severity
Created 2025-12-29
Updated 2025-12-29

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.