VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★
PRICE: 0 CENTS
Wednesday, December 31, 2025
Walmart Inc.
WMT · New York Stock Exchange
Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.
Request update
Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.
Overview
Walmart operates three reported segments: Walmart U.S., Walmart International, and Sam's Club U.S. The core moat is a scale-and-logistics flywheel: EDLP/EDLC combined with a dense store and distribution network that lowers unit costs and enables fast omnichannel fulfillment (pickup/delivery). Walmart+ and improving digital experiences can strengthen repeat purchasing, while Sam's Club benefits from upfront membership fees that help subsidize low product markups. The biggest counter-pressures are relentless price competition, rising labor and logistics costs, and in some countries strong local incumbents and regulatory constraints.
Primary segment
Walmart U.S.
Market structure
Competitive
Market share
20%-22% (reported)
HHI: —
Coverage
3 segments · 8 tags
Updated 2025-12-30
Segments
Walmart U.S.
U.S. omnichannel discount retail and grocery (supercenters, neighborhood markets, eCommerce)
Revenue
68.3%
Structure
Competitive
Pricing
weak
Share
20%-22% (reported)
Peers
Walmart International
International omnichannel retail and eCommerce platforms (outside the U.S.)
Revenue
18.1%
Structure
Competitive
Pricing
weak
Share
—
Peers
Sam's Club U.S.
U.S. warehouse clubs (membership-based bulk retail, including fuel)
Revenue
13.6%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
moderate
Share
29%-33% (estimated)
Peers
Moat Claims
Walmart U.S.
U.S. omnichannel discount retail and grocery (supercenters, neighborhood markets, eCommerce)
FY2025 segment totals per 10-K: Walmart U.S. total revenues $465,009M; operating income $23,882M (corporate/support excluded from operating_profit_share).
Scale Economies Unit Cost
Supply
Scale Economies Unit Cost
Strength: 5/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence
Purchasing scale plus disciplined cost control (EDLC) fund EDLP, allowing Walmart to sustain low prices while investing in stores, eCommerce, and automation.
Erosion risks
- E-commerce price transparency compresses margins
- Labor and transportation cost inflation
- Rivals matching logistics and automation investment (especially AMZN)
Leading indicators
- Gross margin and SG&A rate trend
- Supply chain cost per unit shipped
- Inventory turns and in-stock rates
Counterarguments
- Scale benefits can be competed away if rivals subsidize prices
- Low-price positioning limits gross margin expansion even with scale
Physical Network Density
Supply
Physical Network Density
Strength: 5/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence
Dense store footprint doubles as a last-mile fulfillment network (pickup and delivery) and lowers per-order delivery cost vs pure-play eCommerce in many zip codes.
Erosion risks
- Shift of demand to pure-play eCommerce and delivery aggregators
- Store traffic decline in recessionary periods
- Local delivery competition improving (Instacart, DoorDash partnerships)
Leading indicators
- Digital penetration of segment sales
- Pickup and delivery order growth and unit economics
- Same-store sales and store traffic
Counterarguments
- Physical footprint can become a cost burden if traffic shifts online
- Urban density advantage is weaker where Walmart has fewer stores
Habit Default
Demand
Habit Default
Strength: 4/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence
EDLP plus improving digital convenience (and subscription programs like Walmart+) encourage repeat purchasing and make Walmart a default basket-fill destination for many households.
Erosion risks
- Subscription fatigue and low switching costs in memberships
- Price perception damage if gaps vs peers widen
- Experience disadvantages vs specialty grocers in fresh and quality perception
Leading indicators
- Walmart+ member count and renewal or engagement metrics
- Share of wallet and basket size proxies (transaction count, items per basket)
- Customer satisfaction and Net Promoter Score (if disclosed)
Counterarguments
- Consumers can easily multi-home across retailers and cancel memberships
- If rivals match pricing and improve convenience, Walmart may lose default status
Walmart International
International omnichannel retail and eCommerce platforms (outside the U.S.)
FY2025 segment totals per 10-K: Walmart International total revenues $123,363M; operating income $5,501M (corporate/support excluded from operating_profit_share).
Physical Network Density
Supply
Physical Network Density
Strength: 4/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence
Scale footprint across multiple countries provides local convenience and supports omnichannel pickup and delivery, though competitive intensity and regulatory regimes vary by market.
Erosion risks
- Local champions with stronger national brand and supply chains
- FX volatility and country-specific regulation
- Geopolitical friction risks in cross-border supply
Leading indicators
- Constant-currency sales growth by major markets
- eCommerce penetration and profitability trend
- Regulatory changes impacting operations or fintech platforms
Counterarguments
- Scale is fragmented across countries; benefits are less transferable than in a single-country model
- In some markets, Walmart may be a smaller player vs local leaders
Supply Chain Control
Supply
Supply Chain Control
Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence
Distribution and supplier relationships support availability and cost competitiveness, but advantages vary by region and can be matched by strong local competitors.
Erosion risks
- Supply shocks (shipping disruptions, tariffs, commodity inflation)
- Supplier concentration and bargaining dynamics
- Competitive imitation of distribution automation
Leading indicators
- In-stock rates and inventory turns by market
- Gross margin trend in key countries
- Logistics cost as a percent of sales (if disclosed)
Counterarguments
- Local retailers can have similar or better supplier terms due to national dominance
- Distribution advantages can be competed away with capex
Ecosystem Complements
Network
Ecosystem Complements
Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence
In some markets, Walmart is building a multi-business ecosystem (marketplace, fulfillment, advertising, and financial services) that can reinforce engagement and monetization beyond retail margin.
Erosion risks
- Regulatory constraints on fintech and payments in certain countries
- Winner-take-most dynamics favoring entrenched digital platforms
- Execution risk integrating multiple business models
Leading indicators
- Growth and profitability of marketplace and fintech assets (if disclosed)
- Advertising revenue growth and take-rate metrics (if disclosed)
- Customer frequency and app engagement in key markets
Counterarguments
- Ecosystem benefits may be concentrated in a few markets and not generalize
- Best-of-breed digital platforms can outcompete on product depth and UX
Sam's Club U.S.
U.S. warehouse clubs (membership-based bulk retail, including fuel)
FY2025 segment totals per 10-K: Sam's Club U.S. total revenues $92,561M; operating income $2,404M (corporate/support excluded from operating_profit_share).
Float Prepayment
Financial
Float Prepayment
Strength: 3/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence
Upfront membership fees provide recurring, relatively stable high-margin income that supports low product markups and competitive pricing.
Erosion risks
- Member churn if value proposition weakens
- Competitive fee changes or macro-driven downgrades
- Membership sharing and fraud reducing effective monetization
Leading indicators
- Membership income growth rate
- Renewal rate and tier mix (if disclosed)
- Traffic and comparable sales excluding fuel
Counterarguments
- Membership is not exclusive; consumers can switch between clubs easily
- Fee increases risk churn in price-sensitive cohorts
Scale Economies Unit Cost
Supply
Scale Economies Unit Cost
Strength: 4/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence
Large sales volume supports bulk purchasing and distribution efficiency, though Costco's scale and model simplicity remain formidable.
Erosion risks
- Costco maintains cost advantage via simplified SKU strategy
- Fuel volatility affecting traffic and reported economics
- Rising shrink and labor costs
Leading indicators
- Membership and merchandise gross margin trend
- Inventory turnover and shrink metrics (if disclosed)
- Comparable sales growth excluding fuel
Counterarguments
- Costco's renewal rates and global scale can translate to better buying terms
- Warehouse club differentiation can be narrow (price, gas, limited assortment)
Evidence
EDLC is our commitment to control expenses so our cost savings can be passed along to our customers.
Direct statement of a cost-leadership strategy that relies on scale efficiencies to maintain low prices.
Walmart U.S. operates 164 distribution facilities. We also operate 29 dedicated eCommerce fulfillment centers.
Large logistics footprint supports lower unit logistics costs and reliable in-stock levels at scale.
Operates 4,605 stores.
Scale and density of physical nodes are a structural advantage for convenience and omnichannel fulfillment.
The Walmart U.S. segment includes the Company's mass merchandising concept in the U.S., as well as eCommerce, which includes omnichannel initiatives.
Shows management explicitly treats eCommerce and omnichannel as integrated into the segment economics.
Primarily due to double-digit growth in Walmart+ members and higher member engagement.
Evidence that subscription-based engagement is growing, supporting repeat usage and retention dynamics.
Showing 5 of 15 sources.
Risks & Indicators
Erosion risks
- E-commerce price transparency compresses margins
- Labor and transportation cost inflation
- Rivals matching logistics and automation investment (especially AMZN)
- Shift of demand to pure-play eCommerce and delivery aggregators
- Store traffic decline in recessionary periods
- Local delivery competition improving (Instacart, DoorDash partnerships)
Leading indicators
- Gross margin and SG&A rate trend
- Supply chain cost per unit shipped
- Inventory turns and in-stock rates
- Digital penetration of segment sales
- Pickup and delivery order growth and unit economics
- Same-store sales and store traffic
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.