VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 0 CENTS

Thursday, January 8, 2026

Watsco, Inc.

WSO · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$14.4B
SectorIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - Distribution
CountryUS
Data as of
Moat score
72/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Watsco, Inc. (NYSE: WSO) is the largest HVAC/R distributor in North America, serving licensed contractor customers through a dense branch network. Its core moat in HVAC/R distribution is built on physical network density and inventory availability, reinforced by exclusive territorial distribution agreements with major OEMs and scale-driven cost/operating advantages. A growing digital layer (apps, e-commerce, and contractor sales/financing tools) aims to deepen workflow integration and retention. The industry remains highly fragmented and competitive, and supplier concentration (notably Carrier) is both a competitive lever and a key risk.

Primary segment

HVAC/R Distribution

Market structure

Competitive

Market share

9%-12% (implied)

HHI:

Coverage

1 segments · 5 tags

Updated 2026-01-05

Segments

HVAC/R Distribution

HVAC/R equipment, parts and supplies distribution

Revenue

100%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

9%-12% (implied)

Peers

FERGCARRTTLII

Moat Claims

HVAC/R Distribution

HVAC/R equipment, parts and supplies distribution

Supplier concentration is high (top 10 suppliers ~85% of purchases; Carrier ~62%, Rheem ~9%). Carrier-related joint ventures represented ~54% of revenue in 2024.

Competitive

Physical Network Density

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Dense branch/warehouse network and inventory availability create time-to-service advantage for contractors (especially in replacement market).

Erosion risks

  • Large rivals expand branch networks
  • Direct-to-contractor OEM programs reduce distributor role
  • Last-mile logistics improvements reduce advantage of local inventory

Leading indicators

  • Number of locations and service coverage
  • In-stock rates / backorder frequency
  • Delivery speed and fill rates

Counterarguments

  • Contractors often multi-source across distributors, limiting lock-in
  • Branch density is costly and can be a fixed-cost drag in downcycles

Contractual Exclusivity

Legal

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Exclusive territorial distribution rights and trade-name agreements with key OEMs (notably Carrier/Rheem/Mitsubishi) support differentiation and local share.

Erosion risks

  • OEMs renegotiate or terminate exclusivity / territory definitions
  • OEM vertical integration via factory-owned stores
  • Supplier consolidation shifts bargaining power

Leading indicators

  • Changes in supplier purchase concentration
  • Announcements of new OEM-owned distribution initiatives
  • Material changes in distribution agreement terms or territory coverage

Counterarguments

  • Exclusivity is territory- and location-specific and can be challenged over time
  • High supplier concentration increases risk if relationships change

Scale Economies Unit Cost

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Scale supports broad product availability, inventory depth, and sustained investment in technology and expertise that smaller distributors struggle to match.

Erosion risks

  • Competitors with comparable scale (e.g., broader MRO/distribution players) push into HVAC
  • Digital procurement reduces importance of local scale
  • Higher working capital needs in regulatory product transitions

Leading indicators

  • Gross margin and SG&A leverage over cycles
  • Inventory turns and working capital intensity
  • Acquisition pace and integration performance

Counterarguments

  • Service quality and local relationships can outweigh pure scale
  • Scale does not eliminate supplier dependency

Data Workflow Lockin

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Digital tools (mobile apps, e-commerce, quoting + financing) embed Watsco into contractor workflows and improve retention, though tools are replicable.

Erosion risks

  • Competitors and OEMs offer similar digital ordering/quoting tools
  • Contractors adopt third-party software that reduces distributor-specific switching costs
  • Cybersecurity incidents reduce trust in digital channels

Leading indicators

  • E-commerce penetration of sales
  • Monthly active users of contractor apps
  • OnCallAir GMV and customer retention metrics

Counterarguments

  • Digital tools can be copied or bought; not a permanent barrier
  • Contractors can use multiple distributors' portals simultaneously

Evidence

sec_filing
Watsco, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - footprint

...operated from 690 locations... serve more than 130,000 active contractors...

Supports local availability and large contractor-served footprint.

sec_filing
Watsco, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - service model

...maintaining a strong density of warehouse locations... well-stocked inventories... technical expertise...

Describes the density+inventory-based value proposition versus smaller competitors.

sec_filing
Watsco, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - distribution agreements

...distribution agreements with Carrier, Rheem, and Mitsubishi... distribution rights on an exclusive basis in specified territories...

Direct statement of exclusive distribution rights in certain territories.

sec_filing
Watsco, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - supplier concentration

The Company's top ten suppliers accounted for 85% of our purchases, including 62% from Carrier, and 9% from Rheem.

Shows the depth of reliance/partnership with key OEMs underpinning exclusivity and access.

sec_filing
Watsco, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - scale vs small competitors

...competitive advantage over smaller, less-capitalized competitors... unable to... maintain... locations... implement technological business solutions... maintain... inventory levels...

Management explicitly ties scale/capital to ability to invest in locations, inventory and tech.

Showing 5 of 11 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Large rivals expand branch networks
  • Direct-to-contractor OEM programs reduce distributor role
  • Last-mile logistics improvements reduce advantage of local inventory
  • OEMs renegotiate or terminate exclusivity / territory definitions
  • OEM vertical integration via factory-owned stores
  • Supplier consolidation shifts bargaining power

Leading indicators

  • Number of locations and service coverage
  • In-stock rates / backorder frequency
  • Delivery speed and fill rates
  • Customer attrition and cohort retention
  • Changes in supplier purchase concentration
  • Announcements of new OEM-owned distribution initiatives
Created 2026-01-05
Updated 2026-01-05

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.