VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★
PRICE: 0 CENTS
Monday, January 5, 2026
Legrand S.A.
LR · Euronext Paris
Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.
Request update
Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.
Overview
Legrand is a France-based industrial group focused on low-voltage electrical and digital building infrastructures. In its core building-infrastructure business, differentiation is driven by compliance/standards know-how, a very broad product portfolio, and installer/channel preference for proven brands. Legrand has also built a sizable datacenter infrastructure platform (power distribution, busway, racks/cabling and related solutions), supported by innovation and targeted acquisitions. Key pressures include cyclical construction activity, intense competition from global electrification peers, and the risk of commoditization in standardized product categories.
Primary segment
Building electrical & digital infrastructure (non-datacenter)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Market share
—
HHI: —
Coverage
2 segments · 6 tags
Updated 2026-01-02
Segments
Building electrical & digital infrastructure (non-datacenter)
Low-voltage electrical and digital building infrastructure (wiring devices, energy distribution, cable management, building controls)
Revenue
80%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
moderate
Share
—
Peers
Datacenter infrastructure
Datacenter physical infrastructure (power distribution, busway, racks, structured cabling, UPS/power quality, related accessories)
Revenue
20%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
moderate
Share
—
Peers
Moat Claims
Building electrical & digital infrastructure (non-datacenter)
Low-voltage electrical and digital building infrastructure (wiring devices, energy distribution, cable management, building controls)
Revenue share set as the residual after disclosed datacenter activity share (~20% of group revenue in 2024).
Compliance Advantage
Legal
Compliance Advantage
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Electrical infrastructure products must comply with local codes and standards. Legrand positions itself as having deep, cross-country standards expertise, which reduces specifier/installer risk and supports repeat purchasing.
Erosion risks
- Standards harmonization reducing differentiation
- Competitors matching certifications and compliance coverage
- Regulatory shifts requiring rapid re-certification
Leading indicators
- Share gains/losses in key regions (Europe, North America)
- Product certification cadence and time-to-market vs peers
- Installer/wholesaler preference surveys (where available)
Counterarguments
- Compliance is necessary but not sufficient; multiple rivals meet standards
- Local champions can be equally compliant and more price-competitive
Scope Economies
Supply
Scope Economies
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
A very broad product catalog supports one-stop purchasing for distributors/installers and improves cross-selling across building projects, helping shelf space and channel mindshare.
Erosion risks
- Channel disintermediation (direct-to-project procurement)
- Commoditization of basic devices and accessories
- Fragmented regional standards limiting global SKU leverage
Leading indicators
- New-product introduction rate
- Cross-sell penetration (multi-line wins with distributors)
- Gross margin resilience vs input-cost swings
Counterarguments
- Large diversified rivals can match breadth (and bundle with higher-level systems)
- Installers may still buy best-of-breed components by category
Brand Trust
Demand
Brand Trust
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
In safety-critical electrical infrastructure, established brands can command preference when reliability and code compliance matter, supporting modest pricing power in professional channels.
Erosion risks
- Quality incidents or recalls damaging reputation
- Price-led competition in commoditized categories
- Construction downturns increasing customer price sensitivity
Leading indicators
- Warranty/return rates
- Price/mix and gross margin trends
- Distributor shelf-space and recommended-brand placements
Counterarguments
- Many SKUs are functionally similar; purchasing may be price-driven
- Brand may be less decisive for large projects with engineer-led specs
Datacenter infrastructure
Datacenter physical infrastructure (power distribution, busway, racks, structured cabling, UPS/power quality, related accessories)
Legrand discloses datacenter activity at ~20% of group revenue in 2024; Reuters reported ~25% of total sales in 2025 as AI-driven demand accelerated.
Design In Qualification
Demand
Design In Qualification
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Datacenter power and physical infrastructure components are typically specified early in project design and must meet reliability and performance requirements, creating inertia once a vendor is qualified.
Erosion risks
- Standardization reducing differentiation (commodity PDUs/racks)
- Fast technology shifts (power density, cooling architectures)
- Large customers dual-source or self-design critical components
Leading indicators
- Datacenter order growth vs industry capex cycles
- Win rates with hyperscalers/colocation (where disclosed indirectly)
- Share of revenue from repeat customers and framework agreements (if disclosed)
Counterarguments
- Big customers have procurement leverage and can switch with sufficient lead time
- Competitors (Schneider/Eaton/Vertiv) have comparable qualification credentials
Scope Economies
Supply
Scope Economies
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Legrand has built a scaled datacenter platform (materials, brands, and bolt-on acquisitions) that supports breadth across the datacenter power/physical stack; this scale can improve channel access and credibility with large operators.
Erosion risks
- Overpaying for acquisitions; integration complexity
- Datacenter build cycle slowdown after hyperscaler capex peaks
- Price pressure from large customers and aggressive competitors
Leading indicators
- Datacenter organic growth rate vs group organic growth
- Acquisition pipeline and post-deal margin performance
- Mix shift toward hyperscale vs enterprise datacenters
Counterarguments
- Scale is shared with larger peers (e.g., Schneider/Eaton) that may bundle broader electrification portfolios
- Growth in datacenters can attract new entrants and intensify price competition
Brand Trust
Demand
Brand Trust
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
In a reliability-sensitive market, vendor reputation matters; Legrand publicly positions itself as a leading/datacenter-focused player, supporting trust with operators and contractors.
Erosion risks
- High-profile outages or product failures tied to Legrand components
- Competitors winning marquee hyperscale accounts
- Regulatory/standards changes increasing compliance burden
Leading indicators
- Customer concentration and contract wins (where disclosed via acquisitions/press)
- Quality metrics and recall incidence
- Gross margin trends in datacenter-related businesses
Counterarguments
- World champion branding may not translate into sustainable share gains versus larger incumbents
- Datacenter buyers often dual-source; reputation alone may not secure long-term pricing power
Evidence
...built up a unique expertise in regional and national standards...
Supports a standards/compliance advantage across geographies.
wide range of more than 300,000 product lines
Evidence of portfolio breadth supporting scope economies and channel convenience.
Legrand is a global specialist in electrical and digital building infrastructures...
Positions Legrand as a specialist brand in its core domain.
Sales of EUR 8.6 billion... Adjusted operating margin of 20.5%
Sustained profitability is consistent with differentiated positioning vs pure commodity suppliers.
...power quality solutions... for datacenters... where reliable delivery of power is required.
Supports the mission-critical reliability context that drives qualification and design-in behavior.
Showing 5 of 9 sources.
Risks & Indicators
Erosion risks
- Standards harmonization reducing differentiation
- Competitors matching certifications and compliance coverage
- Regulatory shifts requiring rapid re-certification
- Channel disintermediation (direct-to-project procurement)
- Commoditization of basic devices and accessories
- Fragmented regional standards limiting global SKU leverage
Leading indicators
- Share gains/losses in key regions (Europe, North America)
- Product certification cadence and time-to-market vs peers
- Installer/wholesaler preference surveys (where available)
- New-product introduction rate
- Cross-sell penetration (multi-line wins with distributors)
- Gross margin resilience vs input-cost swings
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.