★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

Stock Profile

YASKAWA Electric Corporation (6506) Moat Analysis

YASKAWA Electric Corporation

6506 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$8.7B
SectorIndustrials
IndustryElectrical Equipment & Parts
CountryJP
Data as of
Moat score
49/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

YASKAWA Electric is a Japan-based factory-automation company listed primarily in Tokyo and secondarily in Fukuoka. At 2026-05-31 it had 266,690,497 issued shares including 7,322,737 treasury shares, or 259,367,760 shares outstanding excluding treasury. In Q1 FY2026, revenue rose 10.6% to JPY 138,982M while operating profit fell 19.2% to JPY 8,486M; Motion Control supplied 48.7% of reported segment revenue and 71.6% of pre-reconciliation segment profit, versus 40.8% and 8.4% for Robotics. Lifecycle support around installed motion-control and robot equipment is a moderate moat: it can reduce downtime and reinforce OEM continuity, but Yaskawa does not disclose service attach, retention, revenue, or margins, and capable rivals offer similar support. Company estimates of 16% global AC servo-drive share and 7% industrial-robot shipment share are supporting submarket context, not standalone moat proof. System Engineering and Other have no verified structural moat.

Primary segment

Motion Control

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

16% (reported)

HHI:

Coverage

4 segments · 7 tags

Updated 2026-08-09

Segments

Motion Control

Factory automation motion control components (AC servo motors/drives & controllers, AC drives/inverters)

Revenue

48.7%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

16% (reported)

Peers

6503.T6645.TSIE.DEROK+3

Robotics

Industrial robots and robot systems (including controllers and application packages)

Revenue

40.8%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

weak

Share

7% (reported)

Peers

6954.TABBN.SW7012.T000333.SZ+1

System Engineering

Industrial and social infrastructure systems engineering (industrial automation drives, large plant/infrastructure systems, and related services)

Revenue

7.1%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

6501.T6503.T7011.T7012.T

Other / Logistics Services

Logistics services and other ancillary businesses

Revenue

3.5%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

Moat Claims

Motion Control

Factory automation motion control components (AC servo motors/drives & controllers, AC drives/inverters)

Q1 FY2026 (three months ended 2026-05-31) segment revenue was JPY 67,635M and segment operating profit was JPY 7,562M. Revenue share uses the JPY 138,981M sum of reported segment revenue, which differs from consolidated revenue by JPY 1M due to rounding. Operating-profit share uses the JPY 10,564M sum before the JPY 2,078M reconciliation to consolidated operating profit.

Oligopoly

Service Field Network

Supply

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Yaskawa supports installed motion-control equipment through global service locations, 24/7 contact support, rapid on-site response, training, maintenance, parts, and upgrades. These capabilities can reduce downtime and create some OEM-service continuity, but Yaskawa does not separately disclose service revenue, attach rates, retention, or margins, and major automation rivals offer comparable lifecycle support.

Service Field Network moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Rise of lower-cost competitors (especially China)
  • Independent automation-service firms expanding coverage
  • Open standards and easier commissioning reducing reliance on OEM service

Leading indicators

  • Service revenue and contract attach rate
  • Response-time and first-time-fix metrics
  • Replacement-parts availability and installed-base growth

Counterarguments

  • Customers can use independent technicians or internal maintenance teams
  • Competitors also operate global lifecycle-support organizations

Robotics

Industrial robots and robot systems (including controllers and application packages)

Q1 FY2026 (three months ended 2026-05-31) segment revenue was JPY 56,728M and segment operating profit was JPY 888M. Revenue share uses the JPY 138,981M sum of reported segment revenue. Operating-profit share uses the JPY 10,564M sum before reconciliation; ERP-related production disruption and European restructuring weighed on the quarter.

Oligopoly

Service Field Network

Supply

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Global lifecycle support covers robot installation and teaching, 24/7 contact, rapid on-site recovery, maintenance, parts, and upgrades. This can create continuity around an installed robot fleet, but service economics and retention are not separately disclosed, while integrators, internal maintenance teams, and rival robot OEMs provide credible alternatives.

Service Field Network moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Independent service organizations (ISOs) expanding capabilities
  • Customers standardize on multi-vendor robot fleets
  • Lower reliability reducing differentiation

Leading indicators

  • Service revenue share / recurring service contracts (if disclosed)
  • Spare parts and service margin trends
  • Installed base growth vs shipments

Counterarguments

  • Robots can be serviced by third-party integrators in many regions
  • Large customers maintain internal maintenance teams

System Engineering

Industrial and social infrastructure systems engineering (industrial automation drives, large plant/infrastructure systems, and related services)

Q1 FY2026 (three months ended 2026-05-31) segment revenue was JPY 9,816M and segment operating profit was JPY 1,921M. Revenue share uses the JPY 138,981M sum of reported segment revenue; operating-profit share uses the JPY 10,564M sum before reconciliation. No segment-specific structural moat was verified beyond execution capabilities shared by established rivals.

Competitive

Other / Logistics Services

Logistics services and other ancillary businesses

Q1 FY2026 (three months ended 2026-05-31) segment revenue was JPY 4,802M and segment operating profit was JPY 193M. Revenue share is adjusted by one unit in the sixth decimal so reported segment shares sum exactly to 1 after rounding; operating-profit share uses the pre-reconciliation segment sum. No structural moat was verified for the ancillary activities.

Competitive

Evidence

other

24/7 Service ... swift on-site operations ... Replacement parts service with 24-hour shipping

Directly documents the delivery capabilities and global-location model behind lifecycle support.

other

AC servo drive 16%

Market share figure is explicitly presented as a company estimate.

other

Installation service ... Recovery support from a breakdown ... Maintenance services ... Modification and update services

Directly documents a global service-location model across the installed-product lifecycle.

other

Industrial robot 7%

Market share figure is explicitly presented as a company estimate.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Rise of lower-cost competitors (especially China)
  • Independent automation-service firms expanding coverage
  • Open standards and easier commissioning reducing reliance on OEM service
  • Independent service organizations (ISOs) expanding capabilities
  • Customers standardize on multi-vendor robot fleets
  • Lower reliability reducing differentiation

Leading indicators

  • Service revenue and contract attach rate
  • Response-time and first-time-fix metrics
  • Replacement-parts availability and installed-base growth
  • Service revenue share / recurring service contracts (if disclosed)
  • Spare parts and service margin trends
  • Installed base growth vs shipments

Keep the research going

Created 2025-12-29
Updated 2026-08-09

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.