VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Saturday, January 3, 2026

Stock Comparison

Kubota Corporation vs AMETEK, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Kubota Corporation

6326 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$2.5T
Gross margin (TTM)29.9%
Operating margin (TTM)9%
Net margin (TTM)5.9%
SectorIndustrials
IndustryAgricultural - Machinery
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
73/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Kubota Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 6326 analysis

AMETEK, Inc.

AME · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$47.3B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorIndustrials
Industry
CountryUS
Data as of2026-01-02
Moat score
66/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into AMETEK, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View AME analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Kubota Corporation leads (73 / 100 vs 66 / 100 for AMETEK, Inc.).
  • Segment focus: Kubota Corporation has 3 segments (87.4% in Farm & Industrial Machinery); AMETEK, Inc. has 2 segments (67.1% in Electronic Instruments Group (EIG)).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Moderate vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: Kubota Corporation has 6 moat types across 3 domains; AMETEK, Inc. has 3 across 1.

Primary market context

Kubota Corporation

Farm & Industrial Machinery

Market

Agricultural machinery and compact construction equipment (incl. compact/utility tractors, construction machinery, engines)

Geography

Global

Customer

Dealers and end users (farmers, contractors, municipalities)

Role

OEM

Revenue share

87.4%

AMETEK, Inc.

Electronic Instruments Group (EIG)

Market

Advanced analytical, test and measurement instruments

Geography

Global

Customer

B2B (process, industrial, aerospace, medical, research)

Role

Instrument/OEM supplier

Revenue share

67.1%

Side-by-side metrics

Kubota Corporation
AMETEK, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
6326 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
AME - New York Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$2.5T
$47.3B
Gross margin (TTM)
29.9%
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
9%
n/a
Net margin (TTM)
5.9%
n/a
Sector
Industrials
Industrials
Industry
Agricultural - Machinery
n/a
HQ country
JP
US
Primary segment
Farm & Industrial Machinery
Electronic Instruments Group (EIG)
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
22%-28% (estimated)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Strong
Moat score
73 / 100
66 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand, Legal
Supply
Last update
2025-12-30
2026-01-02

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

No overlap yet.

Kubota Corporation strengths

Service Field NetworkInstalled Base ConsumablesBrand TrustLong Term ContractsGovernment Contracting RelationshipsAdjacency moat from captive support services

AMETEK, Inc. strengths

Capex Knowhow ScaleOperational ExcellenceScope Economies

Segment mix

Kubota Corporation segments

Full profile >

Farm & Industrial Machinery

Oligopoly

87.4%

Water & Environment

Competitive

12%

Other

Competitive

0.6%

AMETEK, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Electronic Instruments Group (EIG)

Oligopoly

67.1%

Electromechanical Group (EMG)

Competitive

32.9%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.